Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Efficacy and Tolerance Evaluation of an Anti-age Food Supplement: a Randomized, Controlled Clinical Study Versus Untreated Group
Aim of the study was to evaluate the anti-age activity of "Pre-Hyaluron 465 Innēov" a food supplement, composed with a precursor of HA (glucosamine) and an enzymatic co-factor of HA synthesis (manganese), taken for 4 consecutive months by female subjects aged 35-60 years (with preference for subjects over 45 years), with moderate-severe skin aging/photoaging according to a reference photographic scale.
The study foresaw the evaluation of the study product activity versus a control group, untreated.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pre-Hyaluron 465 Innēov | Experimental | 43 caucasian female subjects have taken during a meal, for the first 4 months of trial,1 capsule and 1 tablet/die of the food supplement composed with a precursor of HA (glucosamine) and an enzymatic co-factor of HA synthesis (manganese) . |
|
| Untreated group | No Intervention | 23 caucasian female subjects untreated |
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pre-Hyaluron 465 Innēov | Dietary Supplement | Food supplement consisting og a tablet and a capsule, composed with a precursor of HA (glucosamine) and an enzymatic co-factor of HA synthesis (manganese) |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Crow's feet visual score variation | Wrinkles grade was determined according to l'Oreal clinical standardized photographic scales | Basal visit (T0), 1 month (T1), 2 months (T2), 3 months (T3), 4 months (T4), 5 months (T5) |
| Nasolabial folds visual score variation | Wrinkles grade was determined according to l'Oreal clinical standardized photographic scales | Basal visit (T0), 1 month (T1), 2 months (T2), 3 months (T3), 4 months (T4), 5 months (T5) |
| Surface microrelief regularity evaluation | Regularity grade was evaluated according to this score:
| Basal visit (T0), 1 month (T1), 2 months (T2), 3 months (T3), 4 months (T4), 5 months (T5) |
| Skin resistance to pinching clinical score variation | The evaluation was performed at level of cheek (malar region) according to the following score: 0 = very important
| Basal visit (T0), 1 month (T1), 2 months (T2), 3 months (T3), 4 months (T4), 5 months (T5) |
| Skin resistance to traction clinical score variation | The evaluation was performed at level of cheek (malar region) according to the following score: 0 = very important
| Basal visit (T0), 1 month (T1), 2 months (T2), 3 months (T3), 4 months (T4), 5 months (T5) |
| Skin recovery after pinching clinical score variation | The evaluation was performed at level of cheek (malar region) according to the following score: 0 = very important
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Superficial skin hydration | Skin electrical capacitance value measured with Corneometer CM825 (Courage - Khazaka, Köln, Germany). The measure of the skin capacitance properties is an indirect expression of its hydration level. | Basal visit (T0), 1 month (T1), 2 months (T2), 3 months (T3), 4 months (T4), 5 months (T5) |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
4.4.2. Dependent on a clinical condition 4.4.2.1. Dermatological disease,
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Basal visit (T0), 1 month (T1), 2 months (T2), 3 months (T3), 4 months (T4), 5 months (T5) |
| Skin dryness clinical score variation | Clinical evaluation of skin dryness was performed according to the following score: 0 = very hydrated skin
| Basal visit (T0), 1 month (T1), 2 months (T2), 3 months (T3), 4 months (T4), 5 months (T5) |
| Vascular homogeneity clinical score variation | Homogeneity grade was determined according to specific reference clinical and photographic scales and to the following clinical score: 0 = very homogeneous
| Basal visit (T0), 1 month (T1), 2 months (T2), 3 months (T3), 4 months (T4), 5 months (T5) |
| Pigmentary homogeneity clinical score variation | Homogeneity grade was determined according to specific reference clinical and photographic scales and to the following clinical score: 0 = very homogeneous
| Basal visit (T0), 1 month (T1), 2 months (T2), 3 months (T3), 4 months (T4), 5 months (T5) |
| Skin radiance clinical score variation | Skin radiance was evaluated using a 10 points scale from very poor to good | Basal visit (T0), 1 month (T1), 2 months (T2), 3 months (T3), 4 months (T4), 5 months (T5) |
| Skin plumpness clinical score variation | Skin plumpness was evaluated using a 10 points scale from very poor to good | Basal visit (T0), 1 month (T1), 2 months (T2), 3 months (T3), 4 months (T4), 5 months (T5) |
| Deep skin hydration |
Tissue dielectric constant value of superficial and deep skin layers measured with MoistureMeterD (Delfin Technologies, Kuopio - Finland) |
| Basal visit (T0), 1 month (T1), 2 months (T2), 3 months (T3), 4 months (T4), 5 months (T5) |
| Determination of roughness profilometric parameters | Nasolabial folds profilometric parameters measured by Primos compact portable device (GFMesstechnik). Ra is average roughness of the analysed profile, Rt is wrinkles total high, Rv is wrinkles maximum depth. | Basal visit (T0), 1 month (T1), 2 months (T2), 3 months (T3), 4 months (T4), 5 months (T5) |
| Tolerance evaluation | The food supplement tolerance will be evaluated considering: any adverse event related to the study treatment, which occurred during the study; any judgement reported by the volunteers. | Basal visit (T0), 1 month (T1), 2 months (T2), 3 months (T3), 4 months (T4), 5 months (T5) |