Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
to evaluate the surgical effect of levator aponeurosis resection Versus two point fixation levator aponeurosis Tucking for Congenital Ptosis
Target population for the study is children under twelve years old presenting to ophthalmology clinic at Cairo university specialized pediatric hospital with congenital ptosis.
Patients will be randomly divided into two groups First group (A) will contain 20 patients who will undergo standard levator aponeurosis resection Second group (B) will contain 20 patient who will undergo two point fixation levator tucking
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| levator resection | Active Comparator | 20 patients who will undergo levator aponeurosis resection technique |
|
| levator tucking | Active Comparator | 20 patients who will undergo two point fixation levator tucking technique |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| levator resection | Procedure | The levator aponeurosis was dissected from the upper border of the tarsal plate and conjunctiva. The aponeurosis was measured for the desired amount of resection and fixed to the exposed tarsal border with three point mattress sutures with 6-0 prolene then amount measured resect. The skin incision closed by continuous suture with 6-0 prolene. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Comparison of surgical efficacy of standard levator aponeurosis resection and two point fixation tucking regarding MRD1 | MRD1:distance between upper lid margin and corneal light reflex measured in mm by transparent ruler | 6 to 9 months |
Not provided
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| RANIA AS EL ASSAWY, PhD | Cairo University | Study Chair |
| Sameh HA ABDEL BAKY, MD | Cairo University | Study Director |
| DINA HO HASSANIEN, MD | Cairo University | Study Director |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HEBA | Cairo | Zahraa AL Maadi | Egypt |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Type | Date | Date Unknown |
|---|---|---|
| Release | Oct 3, 2017 | |
| Reset | Oct 30, 2017 | |
| Release | Jan 19, 2018 | |
| Reset | Oct 25, 2018 |
Not provided
Not provided
| Release Date | Unrelease Date | Unrelease Date Unknown | Reset Date | MCP Release Number |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 3, 2017 | Oct 30, 2017 | |||
| Jan 19, 2018 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| levator tucking | Procedure | The levator aponeurosis was dissected from the upper border of the tarsal plate and conjunctiva. . The aponeurosis was measured for desired amount of tucking The skin incision closed by continuous suture with 7-0 prolene. |
|
| Oct 25, 2018 |