Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| McCormick Science Institute | INDUSTRY |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This study aims to reduce the amount of sugar in a particular food item and add spices to see if the food liking of that item rates as high or higher in a post meal survey. Through the weekly feeding and testing of the menu items the investigators will determine an opinion of the participants. Results of these surveys will determine whether participants enjoy the reduced sugar options as much as their full sugar counterparts.
The Investigators will determine the overall consumer acceptability of a breakfast meal (tea and oatmeal) and a dessert (apple crisp) using a randomized, three-period, within subjects, crossover design. The three test conditions will be (1) Full sugar ("FS"), (2) reduced sugar (and calorie) with no added spice ("RS") and (3) reduced sugar (and calorie) plus spice ("RSS"). The two reduced sugar meals will be matched for calories. Subjects will taste each condition of the item on a separate day; tastings will be one week apart.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| full sugar recipe | Active Comparator | Each subject was randomly assigned to one of six possible sequences to taste three recipes of each test item. Oatmeal and tea were served together and tastings occurred over three weeks; tasting of apple crisp occurred over three different weeks. Tastings of the three recipes occurred one week apart. The three recipes were full sugar recipe (FS), reduced sugar recipe (RS) and reduced sugar plus spice recipe (RSS). Each subject was randomly assigned to one of the below sequence schedules for each taste test whereby A, B, and C refer to one of the three recipes (FS, RS, or RSS): Sequence 1: A, B, C Sequence 2: A, C, B Sequence 3: B, A, C Sequence 4: B, C, A Sequence 5: C, A, B Sequence 6: C, B, A |
|
| reduced sugar recipe | Experimental | Each subject was randomly assigned to one of six possible sequences to taste three recipes of each test item. Oatmeal and tea were served together and tastings occurred over three weeks; tasting of apple crisp occurred over three different weeks. Tastings of the three recipes occurred one week apart. The three recipes were full sugar recipe (FS), reduced sugar recipe (RS) and reduced sugar plus spice recipe (RSS). Each subject was randomly assigned to one of the below sequence schedules for each taste test whereby A, B, and C refer to one of the three recipes (FS, RS, or RSS): Sequence 1: A, B, C Sequence 2: A, C, B Sequence 3: B, A, C Sequence 4: B, C, A Sequence 5: C, A, B Sequence 6: C, B, A |
|
| reduced sugar plus spice recipe | Experimental | Each subject was randomly assigned to one of six possible sequences to taste three recipes of each test item. Oatmeal and tea were served together and tastings occurred over three weeks; tasting of apple crisp occurred over three different weeks. Tastings of the three recipes occurred one week apart. The three recipes were full sugar recipe (FS), reduced sugar recipe (RS) and reduced sugar plus spice recipe (RSS). Each subject was randomly assigned to one of the below sequence schedules for each taste test whereby A, B, and C refer to one of the three recipes (FS, RS, or RSS): Sequence 1: A, B, C Sequence 2: A, C, B Sequence 3: B, A, C Sequence 4: B, C, A Sequence 5: C, A, B Sequence 6: C, B, A |
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| apple crisp | Other | Subjects tasted three items (apple crisp, tea and oatmeal) in a randomized sequence schedule to allow for tasting the three recipes (full sugar recipe, reduced sugar recipe and reduced sugar plus spice recipe) over three weeks. Oatmeal and tea were served together as a breakfast meal and tastings of oatmeal and tea were done over 3 weeks and tastings for apple crisp (served alone) were done over 3 different weeks. Subjects tasted one of the three recipes at each weekly seating. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| 9-point hedonic scale rating instrument to rate meal satisfaction | Overall liking of each meal with a 9-point hedonic scale rating instrument. The scale is a 9-point likert scale with scores ranging from 1 - 9 to assess liking (where the lowest rating of 1 indicated extreme disliking and the highest rating of 9 indicated extreme liking). | The day of tasting (once per week for 3 weeks) |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| 9-point hedonic scale rating of the entree item (where applicable) | Overall liking of the entree item of each meal with a 9-point hedonic scale rating instrument for each item. The scale is a 9-point likert scale with scores ranging from 1 - 9 to assess liking (where the lowest rating of 1 indicated extreme disliking and the highest rating of 9 indicated extreme liking). | The day of tasting (once per week for 3 weeks) |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| John C. Peters, PhD | University of Colorado, Denver | Principal Investigator |
Not provided
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11056107 | Background | Krauss RM, Eckel RH, Howard B, Appel LJ, Daniels SR, Deckelbaum RJ, Erdman JW Jr, Kris-Etherton P, Goldberg IJ, Kotchen TA, Lichtenstein AH, Mitch WE, Mullis R, Robinson K, Wylie-Rosett J, St Jeor S, Suttie J, Tribble DL, Bazzarre TL. AHA Dietary Guidelines: revision 2000: A statement for healthcare professionals from the Nutrition Committee of the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2000 Oct 31;102(18):2284-99. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.102.18.2284. No abstract available. | |
| 19462326 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D013662 | Tea |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D028321 | Plant Preparations |
| D001688 | Biological Products |
| D045424 | Complex Mixtures |
| D001628 | Beverages |
Not provided
Not provided
Subjects were asked to taste test 3 versions of test items (in randomized order) and provide a liking score for each (tastings of each recipe were done on separate occasions separated by one week)
Not provided
Not provided
Subjects were blind to what version (recipe) of the taste test item they were tasting.
|
|
| tea | Other | Subjects tasted three items (apple crisp, tea and oatmeal) in a randomized sequence schedule to allow for tasting the three recipes (full sugar recipe, reduced sugar recipe and reduced sugar plus spice recipe) over three weeks. Oatmeal and tea were served together as a breakfast meal and tastings of oatmeal and tea were done over 3 weeks and tastings for apple crisp (served alone) were done over 3 different weeks. Subjects tasted one of the three recipes at each weekly seating. |
|
| oatmeal | Other | Subjects tasted three items (apple crisp, tea and oatmeal) in a randomized sequence schedule to allow for tasting the three recipes (full sugar recipe, reduced sugar recipe and reduced sugar plus spice recipe) over three weeks. Oatmeal and tea were served together as a breakfast meal and tastings of oatmeal and tea were done over 3 weeks and tastings for apple crisp (served alone) were done over 3 different weeks. Subjects tasted one of the three recipes at each weekly seating. |
|
| 9-point hedonic scale rating of the beverage item (where applicable) | Over9-point hedonic scale ratingall liking of the beverage item of each meal with a instrument for each item. The scale is a 9-point likert scale with scores ranging from 1 - 9 to assess liking (where the lowest rating of 1 indicated extreme disliking and the highest rating of 9 indicated extreme liking). | The day of tasting (once per week for 3 weeks) |
| Background |
| Essed NH, Kleikers S, van Staveren WA, Kok FJ, de Graaf C. No effect on intake and liking of soup enhanced with mono-sodium glutamate and celery powder among elderly people with olfactory and/or gustatory loss. Int J Food Sci Nutr. 2009;60 Suppl 5:143-54. doi: 10.1080/09637480802710216. Epub 2009 May 21. |
| 12135957 | Background | Howard BV, Wylie-Rosett J. Sugar and cardiovascular disease: A statement for healthcare professionals from the Committee on Nutrition of the Council on Nutrition, Physical Activity, and Metabolism of the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2002 Jul 23;106(4):523-7. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.0000019552.77778.04. No abstract available. |
| 12449285 | Background | Trumbo P, Schlicker S, Yates AA, Poos M; Food and Nutrition Board of the Institute of Medicine, The National Academies. Dietary reference intakes for energy, carbohydrate, fiber, fat, fatty acids, cholesterol, protein and amino acids. J Am Diet Assoc. 2002 Nov;102(11):1621-30. doi: 10.1016/s0002-8223(02)90346-9. No abstract available. |
| 17921363 | Background | Johnson RJ, Segal MS, Sautin Y, Nakagawa T, Feig DI, Kang DH, Gersch MS, Benner S, Sanchez-Lozada LG. Potential role of sugar (fructose) in the epidemic of hypertension, obesity and the metabolic syndrome, diabetes, kidney disease, and cardiovascular disease. Am J Clin Nutr. 2007 Oct;86(4):899-906. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/86.4.899. |
| Background | King, SC, Snow, J, Meiselman, HL, Sainsbury, J, Carr, BT, McCafferty, D, Serrano, D, Gillette, M, Millard, L, Li, Q. Development of a questionnaire to measure consumer wellness associated with foods: The WellSense profile. Food Quality and Preference 39: 82-94, 2014. |
| Background | Littell, RC, Miliken, GA, Stroup, WW, Wolfinger, RD, Schabenberger, O, (eds.): SAS for Mixed Models, Second edn. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc, 2006. |
| 20308626 | Background | Malik VS, Popkin BM, Bray GA, Despres JP, Hu FB. Sugar-sweetened beverages, obesity, type 2 diabetes mellitus, and cardiovascular disease risk. Circulation. 2010 Mar 23;121(11):1356-64. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.876185. No abstract available. |
| 24769295 | Background | Peters JC, Polsky S, Stark R, Zhaoxing P, Hill JO. The influence of herbs and spices on overall liking of reduced fat food. Appetite. 2014 Aug;79:183-8. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2014.04.019. Epub 2014 Apr 24. |
| 25219391 | Background | Polsky S, Beck J, Stark RA, Pan Z, Hill JO, Peters JC. The influence of herbs, spices, and regular sausage and chicken consumption on liking of reduced fat breakfast and lunch items. J Food Sci. 2014 Oct;79(10):S2117-26. doi: 10.1111/1750-3841.12643. Epub 2014 Sep 12. |
| 22332062 | Background | McGuire S. U.S. Department of Agriculture and U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Dietary Guidelines for Americans, 2010. 7th Edition, Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, January 2011. Adv Nutr. 2011 May;2(3):293-4. doi: 10.3945/an.111.000430. Epub 2011 Apr 30. No abstract available. |
| 29476623 | Result | Peters JC, Marker R, Pan Z, Breen JA, Hill JO. The Influence of Adding Spices to Reduced Sugar Foods on Overall Liking. J Food Sci. 2018 Mar;83(3):814-821. doi: 10.1111/1750-3841.14069. Epub 2018 Feb 24. |
| D000066888 |
| Diet, Food, and Nutrition |
| D010829 | Physiological Phenomena |
| D019602 | Food and Beverages |