Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
All potential participants opt to a simultaneous pharmacological clinical trial
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Manchester Metropolitan University | OTHER |
| The University of Hong Kong | OTHER |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) are one of the common physical disabilities in childhood. For SMA, progressive muscle weakness and early fatigue hamper the mobility of the sufferers. Osteopenia is common for this population group due to poor bone growth and muscle disuse. As a result, non-traumatic related fractures and bone pain are common. Recently, whole body vibration therapy (WBVT) has been proven to improve bone health and muscle function in healthy adults and post-menopausal women. Among the limited studies on the WBVT for children with muscular dystrophies, promising results have been shown on gross motor function, balance, and muscle strength and the WBVT appears to be safe for children with SMA.
The present pilot study is designed to investigate if WBVT is safe and feasible for individuals with SMA and if WBVT can improve muscle function, functional abilities, postural control and bone mineral density in children with SMA. Convenience samples of 10 individuals with SMA type III will be recruited. The participants will receive the WBVT of 25 Hertz and a peak-to-peak amplitude of 4mm for a session of about 18 minutes, 3 days per week for 4 weeks. Assessment will be performed at the baseline and the completion of the intervention to examine the muscle function, functional abilities, postural control and bone mineral density of the participants.
It is anticipated that the outcomes of this pilot study for SMA may show if this intervention is safe, feasible and beneficial for children with SMA type III regarding to muscle function, functional abilities, postural control and bone mineral content and if there may be any related practical issues of this intervention to this population group. The outcomes also provide research evidence to clinicians if this intervention should be recommended to individuals of similar problems.
Spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) is an X-chromosome-linked disorder, in which there is a loss of motor neurons from the anterior horn of the spinal cord due to a deletion of the SMN1 gene. SMA is usually classified under 4 categories, based on the onset time and severity of the conditions. Type I SMA is the most severe category, when the boy is diagnosed before 6 months old and has severe muscle weakness, causing them to have poor head control and unable to sit independently. Boys with type II SMA are diagnosed between 6 to 18 months of age and able to sit independently but cannot stand or walk without any assistance. SMA type III is diagnosed between 18 months to 30 years of age and the boys can stand and walk independently but still with variable degrees of muscle weakness. Some would lose ambulation in their early adulthood and require wheelchair mobility. Type IV SMA is the mildest form with an adult onset, normal mobility and longevity. However, they also experience mild muscle weakness throughout their life. This muscle weakness would lead to early loss of ambulation, reduced pulmonary function and complications due to immobilisation such as osteoporosis. Early fatality is not uncommon.
Osteopenia due to disuse is, in fact, common in children with physical disabilities. In a study of 69 children with moderate to severe cerebral palsy (CP), it was shown that the distal femur and lumbar spine areal bone mineral density (BMD) z-scores appeared to worsen with time, which may reflect the possibility of poor bone growth velocity in individuals with CP. Fracture and bone pain are the major complications of osteopenia in CP and the majority of non-traumatic fractures occur in the femur and humerus. Other factors that may contribute to osteopenia in physical disabilities include pubertal delay, vitamin D deficiency, dietary calcium deficiency, under-nutrition and low body weight, corticosteroids or anticonvulsants. Despite of minimising these factors, osteopenia appears to persist.
Limited studies have been done to examine the bone health in children with SMA but more in children with Duchene muscular dystrophy (DMD), which have similar clinical presentations although with different pathologies. A study on 41 boys with DMD, bone density in the proximal femur was significantly decreased even in the ambulatory boys (mean z-score -1.6) and progressing rapidly to a level of 4 standard deviations below the norm when compared with normal boys. Forty-four percent of the boys had an episode of fracture, mostly in the lower limbs.
Recently whole body vibration therapy (WBVT) has been preliminarily shown as a simple and effective technique to increase bone mass, muscle mass and strength. In general, the user stands in a static position such as standing or performs some dynamic movements on a device providing vibrations from a few Hz to 50 Hz (Hertz, Hz represents the number of complete up and down movement cycle per second). It has been hypothesised that the vibrations stimulate the muscle spindles and alpha-motor neurons, eliciting a muscle contraction. The latter would increase the muscle mass and in turn, increase the bone mass. It has also been postulated that direct effect by mechanical deformation of bones and increased fluid flow in the canalicular spaces and stimulation of the osteocytes may contribute increase in bone mass with the vibration therapy. Increase in oxygen consumption, body temperature and skin blood flow (erythema) have also been demonstrated. As WBVT does not elicit a significant cardiovascular response, it appears to be safe to be used in children with various medical conditions.
In a systematic review on 22 studies (including 7 studies on CP and 2 on DMD) for the effect of WBVT on body composition and physical fitness in children and adolescents with disabilities, the authors concluded that WBVT appeared to improve bone mass and muscle strength in this population group. However, heterogeneity of the studies was noticed, including great variations in the treatment protocols and lacking of a control group and hence, no recommended minimal dosage of WBVT can be concluded. Since this review, two more randomised controlled trials (RCT) were published on children with CP. In one recent study, 30 children with spastic diplegia CP of GMFCS levels I to II were randomised into a treatment group (WBVT with traditional physiotherapy) and a control group (physiotherapy only). The treatment group received 3 lots of 3 minutes on and 3 minutes off vibration (12 to 18 Hz), 2 to 5 times per week for 3 months. Significant improvement in knee extensor strength and standing stability was reported in the treatment group. In another study in 2013, 27 children with spastic diplegia or hemiplegia CP of GMFCS levels I to III were randomised to a treatment group or control group and then crossed over after 4 weeks. The treatment group performed specific trunk exercise on the vibration platform (35 Hz), 5 to 10 minute per session, 2 to 4 sessions per week for 4 weeks. Significant improvement was found in gait speed, muscle thickness of the abdominal muscle and number of sit-ups done 1 minute. A visual improvement was also shown in sitting and standing postures.
Although it has been shown that high frequency low amplitude vibration seemed to be a safe rehabilitation in mice with muscular dystrophy, intensive strengthening exercises, which may induce more damage to the muscle fibres for children with DMD or SMA as clinically indicated with a raised serum creatine kinase (SCK) level, remain as a concern. Hence current studies on this population group targeted to examine the safety of this intervention. Three studies on children with DMD and 1 on DMD and SMA using WBVT were found. In general, it appears that WBVT seems to be safe for children with DMD or SMA. Although there might be a raised SCK level, the level would gradually reduce to the baseline level, or if not, there was no clinical sign or symptom for muscle damage. A promising result was also shown in improving bone mineral density in children with DMD. However, due to the overall small number of studies and sample sizes, there is no definite conclusion if WBVT is effective in improving the bone density and muscle strength for this population group yet.
Based on current research evidence, it has been suggested that 10 to 20 minutes per session, at least 3 times per week for minimum 26 weeks with frequency between 25 to 35 Hz and a peak to peak amplitude less than 4 mm may be an appropriate protocol targeting to improve bone mass and muscle strength of children and adolescents with disabilities. Studies of rigorous research designs and homogeneous participants are required to investigate if this recommended dosage of WBVT can improve children with disabling conditions.
Methodology This feasibility study aims to examine the safety of the WBVT on children with type III SMA. Children with type III SMA are targeted as they have adequate independence living in the community but still experience early fatigue during normal level of exercises due to the nature of their condition. They are at high risk of suffering from complications due to compromised mobility such as osteopenia, early loss of ambulation when compared with their healthy peers.
The WBVT will be performed on the GalileoTM Med L Plus (Novotech Medical GmbH) with the study participants standing with both knees flexed at least 20 degrees. The vibration frequency and duration will be increased over 5 days to the maximum of 3 minutes of 24 to 25 Hz with a peak to peak amplitude of 4mm. The participants will undergo the WBVT 1 session per day, 3 days per week for 4 weeks. The whole WBVT session will last 18 minutes with 9 minutes of vibration.
Participants:
10 children with type III SMA aged from 6 to 18 years will be recruited. The age range is extended aiming to increase the number of recruitment due to the rarity of the condition. All participants will continue their usual intervention regime, if any, during the study period.
Recruitment:
Children and families will be identified by their paediatrician at the neuromuscular clinic at the Duchess of Kent Children's Hospital in Hong Kong. Participants and/or their parents/guardians will be asked if they are interested to participate in this study and their contact details (name and contact telephone number) will be passed onto the PI. PI will contact the families by telephone.
Power analysis:
There is no previous study specifically conducted for this group of children and adolescents and hence no data is available for the power calculation. Most importantly, the aim of this study is to examine the safety and feasibility of the WBVT for this group of clients.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intervention group | Experimental | The participants will undergo the whole body vibration therapy 1 session per day, 3 days per week for 4 weeks. The whole total whole body therapy session will last 18 minutes with 9 minutes of vibration. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| whole body vibration therapy | Device | The whole body vibration therapy regime is as follows: Day Vibration 1 Rest 1 Vibration 2 Rest 2 Vibration 3 Rest 3
The participants will perform mini-squats during Vibrations 1 and 3 and weight-shifting between right and left legs during Vibration 2 on the vibration platform under the supervision of a trained research assistant. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| North Star Ambulatory Assessment | examine the gross motor function of the participants. A summed score will be added from each test item. | 4 weeks |
| 2-minute Walk Test | assess submaximal exercise capacity by measuring the distance covered in the 2 minutes in metres | 4 weeks |
| Segmental Assessment of Trunk Control-static | assess the segmental trunk control in sitting position with an ordinal score will be given in static trunk control. Assessment score represents as follows: 1= learning head control, 2= learning upper thoracic control, 3= learning mid-thoracic control, 4= learning lower thoracic control, 5= learning at upper lumber control, 6= learning lower lumbar control, 7= learning full trunk control and 8= achieved full trunk control. | 4 weeks |
| Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory | assess functional capacities in the domains of self care, mobility and social function with a summary score in each domain. A dichotomous score will be given to each question in each domain: 0= unable and 1= able. In self care domain, there are 73 questions, i.e. maximal score is 73. In mobility domain, there are 59 questions i.e. maximal score is 59. In social function domain, there are 65 questions i.e. maximal score is 65. | 4 weeks |
| Body Height | measure height in cm | 4 weeks |
| Body Weight | measure weight in kilograms | 4 weeks |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Percentage of Attendance of Participants | record the percentage of attendance and comments during the intervention | 4 weeks |
| Visual Analogue Scale | record discomfort during the intervention in a scale of 0 (no discomfort) to 10 (maximal discomfort). |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Tamis W Pin, PhD | The Hong Kong Polytechnic University | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Hong Kong Polytechnic University | Hung Hom | Hong Kong |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 24157400 | Background | Vry J, Schubert IJ, Semler O, Haug V, Schonau E, Kirschner J. Whole-body vibration training in children with Duchenne muscular dystrophy and spinal muscular atrophy. Eur J Paediatr Neurol. 2014 Mar;18(2):140-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpn.2013.09.005. Epub 2013 Oct 11. | |
| 15973316 | Background | Henderson RC, Kairalla JA, Barrington JW, Abbas A, Stevenson RD. Longitudinal changes in bone density in children and adolescents with moderate to severe cerebral palsy. J Pediatr. 2005 Jun;146(6):769-75. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2005.02.024. |
| Label | URL |
|---|---|
| Farooq FT, Holcik M, MacKenzie A. Spinal Muscular Atrophy: Classification, Diagnosis, Background, Molecular Mechanism and Development of Therapeutics 2013. | View source |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
One participant was recruited and assigned for the intervention.
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Intervention Group | The participants will undergo the whole body vibration therapy 1 session per day, 3 days per week for 4 weeks. The whole total whole body therapy session will last 18 minutes with 9 minutes of vibration. whole body vibration therapy: The whole body vibration therapy regime is as follows: Day Vibration 1 Rest 1 Vibration 2 Rest 2 Vibration 3 Rest 3
The participants will perform mini-squats during Vibrations 1 and 3 and weight-shifting between right and left legs during Vibration 2 on the vibration platform under the supervision of a trained research assistant. |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
no difference from the assignment in Participant flow.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Intervention Group | The participants will undergo the whole body vibration therapy 1 session per day, 3 days per week for 4 weeks. The whole total whole body therapy session will last 18 minutes with 9 minutes of vibration. whole body vibration therapy: The whole body vibration therapy regime is as follows: Day Vibration 1 Rest 1 Vibration 2 Rest 2 Vibration 3 Rest 3
The participants will perform mini-squats during Vibrations 1 and 3 and weight-shifting between right and left legs during Vibration 2 on the vibration platform under the supervision of a trained research assistant. |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Categorical | Count of Participants |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | North Star Ambulatory Assessment | examine the gross motor function of the participants. A summed score will be added from each test item. | Not Posted | 4 weeks | Participants | |||||||||||
| Primary | 2-minute Walk Test | assess submaximal exercise capacity by measuring the distance covered in the 2 minutes in metres | Not Posted | 4 weeks | Participants |
4 weeks
same definition as listed
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Intervention Group | The participants will undergo the whole body vibration therapy 1 session per day, 3 days per week for 4 weeks. The whole total whole body therapy session will last 18 minutes with 9 minutes of vibration. whole body vibration therapy: The whole body vibration therapy regime is as follows: Day Vibration 1 Rest 1 Vibration 2 Rest 2 Vibration 3 Rest 3
The participants will perform mini-squats during Vibrations 1 and 3 and weight-shifting between right and left legs during Vibration 2 on the vibration platform under the supervision of a trained research assistant. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dr Tamis W Pin | The Hong Kong Polytechnic University | 85227666751 | tamis.pin@polyu.edu.hk |
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot_SAP | Yes | Yes | No | Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan | Aug 1, 2018 | May 9, 2019 | Prot_SAP_000.pdf |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D014897 | Spinal Muscular Atrophies of Childhood |
| D009134 | Muscular Atrophy, Spinal |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D013118 | Spinal Cord Diseases |
| D002493 | Central Nervous System Diseases |
| D009422 | Nervous System Diseases |
| D020271 | Heredodegenerative Disorders, Nervous System |
Not provided
Not provided
A pilot study with a before and after study design
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| Body Mass Index |
calculated based on body height and weight in terms of kg/m2 |
| 4 weeks |
| Bone Mineral Content of Femur | Distal femur BMC will be measured in grams | 4 weeks |
| Bone Mineral Content of Whole Body (Excluding Head) | Whole body (excluding head) BMC will be measured in grams | 4 weeks |
| Areal Bone Mineral Density of Femur | Areal bone mineral density of femur will be measured in grams/cm2 | 4 weeks |
| Areal Bone Mineral Density of Total Body (Excluding Head) | Areal bone mineral density of total body (excluding head) will be measured in grams/cm2 | 4 weeks |
| Volumetric Bone Mineral Density of Lumbar Spine | Volumetric bone mineral density of lumbar spine (L2 to L4) in grams/cm3 | 4 weeks |
| Range of Right Hip Flexion | measure hip flexion in supine using goniometer in degrees | 4 weeks |
| Range of Left Hip Flexion | measure hip flexion in supine using goniometer in degrees | 4 weeks |
| Range of Right Hip Extension | measure hip extension in prone using goniometer in degrees | 4 weeks |
| Range of Left Hip Extension | measure hip extension in prone using goniometer in degrees | 4 weeks |
| Range of Right Hip Abduction | measure hip abduction in supine using goniometer in degrees | 4 weeks |
| Range of Left Hip Abduction | measure hip abduction in supine using goniometer in degrees | 4 weeks |
| Range of Right Knee Flexion | measure knee flexion in prone using goniometer in degrees | 4 weeks |
| Range of Left Knee Flexion | measure knee flexion in prone using goniometer in degrees | 4 weeks |
| Range of Right Knee Extension | measure knee extension in sitting using goniometer in degrees | 4 weeks |
| Range of Left Knee Extension | measure knee extension in sitting using goniometer in degrees | 4 weeks |
| Range of Right Ankle Dorsiflexion | measure ankle dorsiflexion in sitting using goniometer in degrees | 4 weeks |
| Range of Left Ankle Dorsiflexion | measure ankle dorsiflexion in sitting using goniometer in degrees | 4 weeks |
| Range of Right Ankle Plantarflexion | measure ankle plantarflexion in sitting using goniometer in degrees | 4 weeks |
| Range of Left Ankle Plantarflexion | measure ankle plantarflexion in sitting using goniometer in degrees | 4 weeks |
| Muscle Strength of Right Hip Flexors | measure muscle strength of hip flexors in supine using dynamometer in terms of Newton | 4 weeks |
| Muscle Strength of Left Hip Flexors | measure muscle strength of hip flexors in supine using dynamometer in terms of Newton | 4 weeks |
| Muscle Strength of Right Hip Extensors | measure muscle strength of hip extensors in prone using dynamometer in terms of Newton | 4 weeks |
| Muscle Strength of Left Hip Extensors | measure muscle strength of hip extensors in prone using dynamometer in terms of Newton | 4 weeks |
| Muscle Strength of Right Knee Flexors | measure muscle strength of knee flexors in sitting using dynamometer in terms of Newton | 4 weeks |
| Muscle Strength of Left Knee Flexors | measure muscle strength of knee flexors in sitting using dynamometer in terms of Newton | 4 weeks |
| Muscle Strength of Right Knee Extensors | measure muscle strength of knee extensors in sitting using dynamometer in terms of Newton | 4 weeks |
| Muscle Strength of Left Knee Extensors | measure muscle strength of knee extensors in sitting using dynamometer in terms of Newton | 4 weeks |
| Muscle Strength of Right Hip Abductors | measure muscle strength of hip abductors in supine using dynamometer in terms of Newton | 4 weeks |
| Muscle Strength of Left Hip Abductors | measure muscle strength of hip abductors in supine using dynamometer in terms of Newton | 4 weeks |
| Muscle Strength of Right Ankle Dorsiflexors | measure muscle strength of ankle dorsiflexors in sitting using dynamometer in terms of Newton | 4 weeks |
| Muscle Strength of Left Ankle Dorsiflexors | measure muscle strength of ankle dorsiflexors in sitting using dynamometer in terms of Newton | 4 weeks |
| Muscle Strength of Right Ankle Plantarflexors | measure muscle strength of ankle plantarflexors in sitting using dynamometer in terms of Newton | 4 weeks |
| Muscle Strength of Left Ankle Plantarflexors | measure muscle strength of ankle plantarflexors in sitting using dynamometer in terms of Newton | 4 weeks |
| Segmental Assessment of Trunk Control_active | assess the segmental trunk control in sitting position with an ordinal score will be given in active trunk control. Assessment score represents as follows: 1= learning head control, 2= learning upper thoracic control, 3= learning mid-thoracic control, 4= learning lower thoracic control, 5= learning at upper lumber control, 6= learning lower lumbar control, 7= learning full trunk control and 8= achieved full trunk control. | 4 weeks |
| Segmental Assessment of Trunk Control-reactive | assess the segmental trunk control in sitting position with an ordinal score will be given in reactive trunk control. Assessment score represents as follows: 1= learning head control, 2= learning upper thoracic control, 3= learning mid-thoracic control, 4= learning lower thoracic control, 5= learning at upper lumber control, 6= learning lower lumbar control, 7= learning full trunk control and 8= achieved full trunk control. | 4 weeks |
| 4 weeks |
| 17111566 | Background | Stevenson RD, Conaway M, Barrington JW, Cuthill SL, Worley G, Henderson RC. Fracture rate in children with cerebral palsy. Pediatr Rehabil. 2006 Oct-Dec;9(4):396-403. doi: 10.1080/13638490600668061. |
| 19614941 | Background | Mergler S, Evenhuis HM, Boot AM, De Man SA, Bindels-De Heus KG, Huijbers WA, Penning C. Epidemiology of low bone mineral density and fractures in children with severe cerebral palsy: a systematic review. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2009 Oct;51(10):773-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8749.2009.03384.x. Epub 2009 Jul 8. |
| 19643349 | Background | Houlihan CM, Stevenson RD. Bone density in cerebral palsy. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2009 Aug;20(3):493-508. doi: 10.1016/j.pmr.2009.04.004. |
| 12093986 | Background | Henderson RC, Lark RK, Gurka MJ, Worley G, Fung EB, Conaway M, Stallings VA, Stevenson RD. Bone density and metabolism in children and adolescents with moderate to severe cerebral palsy. Pediatrics. 2002 Jul;110(1 Pt 1):e5. doi: 10.1542/peds.110.1.e5. |
| 10641693 | Background | Larson CM, Henderson RC. Bone mineral density and fractures in boys with Duchenne muscular dystrophy. J Pediatr Orthop. 2000 Jan-Feb;20(1):71-4. |
| 19740225 | Background | Rauch F. Vibration therapy. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2009 Oct;51 Suppl 4:166-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8749.2009.03418.x. |
| 15903391 | Background | Jordan MJ, Norris SR, Smith DJ, Herzog W. Vibration training: an overview of the area, training consequences, and future considerations. J Strength Cond Res. 2005 May;19(2):459-66. doi: 10.1519/13293.1. |
| 16903900 | Background | Rehn B, Lidstrom J, Skoglund J, Lindstrom B. Effects on leg muscular performance from whole-body vibration exercise: a systematic review. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2007 Feb;17(1):2-11. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0838.2006.00578.x. Epub 2006 Aug 10. |
| 24388109 | Background | Matute-Llorente A, Gonzalez-Aguero A, Gomez-Cabello A, Vicente-Rodriguez G, Casajus Mallen JA. Effect of whole-body vibration therapy on health-related physical fitness in children and adolescents with disabilities: a systematic review. J Adolesc Health. 2014 Apr;54(4):385-96. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2013.11.001. Epub 2014 Jan 1. |
| 24434887 | Background | El-Shamy SM. Effect of whole-body vibration on muscle strength and balance in diplegic cerebral palsy: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2014 Feb;93(2):114-21. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0b013e3182a541a4. |
| 23477461 | Background | Unger M, Jelsma J, Stark C. Effect of a trunk-targeted intervention using vibration on posture and gait in children with spastic type cerebral palsy: a randomized control trial. Dev Neurorehabil. 2013;16(2):79-88. doi: 10.3109/17518423.2012.715313. |
| 25121503 | Background | Novotny SA, Mader TL, Greising AG, Lin AS, Guldberg RE, Warren GL, Lowe DA. Low intensity, high frequency vibration training to improve musculoskeletal function in a mouse model of Duchenne muscular dystrophy. PLoS One. 2014 Aug 14;9(8):e104339. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0104339. eCollection 2014. |
| 23622359 | Background | Chelly J, Desguerre I. Progressive muscular dystrophies. Handb Clin Neurol. 2013;113:1343-66. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-444-59565-2.00006-X. |
| 24830767 | Background | Myers KA, Ramage B, Khan A, Mah JK. Vibration therapy tolerated in children with Duchenne muscular dystrophy: a pilot study. Pediatr Neurol. 2014 Jul;51(1):126-9. doi: 10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2014.03.005. Epub 2014 Apr 4. |
| 23445910 | Background | Soderpalm AC, Kroksmark AK, Magnusson P, Karlsson J, Tulinius M, Swolin-Eide D. Whole body vibration therapy in patients with Duchenne muscular dystrophy--a prospective observational study. J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact. 2013 Mar;13(1):13-8. |
| 15040823 | Background | Ward K, Alsop C, Caulton J, Rubin C, Adams J, Mughal Z. Low magnitude mechanical loading is osteogenic in children with disabling conditions. J Bone Miner Res. 2004 Mar;19(3):360-9. doi: 10.1359/JBMR.040129. Epub 2004 Jan 27. |
| 23809874 | Background | Mazzone E, Bianco F, Main M, van den Hauwe M, Ash M, de Vries R, Fagoaga Mata J, Stein S, De Sanctis R, D'Amico A, Palermo C, Fanelli L, Scoto MC, Mayhew A, Eagle M, Vigo M, Febrer A, Korinthenberg R, de Visser M, Bushby K, Muntoni F, Goemans N, Sormani MP, Bertini E, Pane M, Mercuri E. Six minute walk test in type III spinal muscular atrophy: a 12month longitudinal study. Neuromuscul Disord. 2013 Aug;23(8):624-8. doi: 10.1016/j.nmd.2013.06.001. Epub 2013 Jul 1. |
| 23643309 | Background | Noto Y, Misawa S, Mori M, Kawaguchi N, Kanai K, Shibuya K, Isose S, Nasu S, Sekiguchi Y, Beppu M, Ohmori S, Nakagawa M, Kuwabara S. Prominent fatigue in spinal muscular atrophy and spinal and bulbar muscular atrophy: evidence of activity-dependent conduction block. Clin Neurophysiol. 2013 Sep;124(9):1893-8. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2012.12.053. Epub 2013 Apr 30. |
| Participants |
|
| Age, Continuous | Mean | Standard Deviation | years |
|
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Race and Ethnicity Not Collected | Race and Ethnicity were not collected from any participant. | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Region of Enrollment | Number | participants |
|
| Primary | Segmental Assessment of Trunk Control-static | assess the segmental trunk control in sitting position with an ordinal score will be given in static trunk control. Assessment score represents as follows: 1= learning head control, 2= learning upper thoracic control, 3= learning mid-thoracic control, 4= learning lower thoracic control, 5= learning at upper lumber control, 6= learning lower lumbar control, 7= learning full trunk control and 8= achieved full trunk control. | Posted | Median | Inter-Quartile Range | score on a scale | 4 weeks |
|
|
|
| Primary | Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory | assess functional capacities in the domains of self care, mobility and social function with a summary score in each domain. A dichotomous score will be given to each question in each domain: 0= unable and 1= able. In self care domain, there are 73 questions, i.e. maximal score is 73. In mobility domain, there are 59 questions i.e. maximal score is 59. In social function domain, there are 65 questions i.e. maximal score is 65. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | 4 weeks |
|
|
|
| Primary | Body Height | measure height in cm | Not Posted | 4 weeks | Participants |
| Primary | Body Weight | measure weight in kilograms | Not Posted | 4 weeks | Participants |
| Primary | Body Mass Index | calculated based on body height and weight in terms of kg/m2 | Not Posted | 4 weeks | Participants |
| Primary | Bone Mineral Content of Femur | Distal femur BMC will be measured in grams | Not Posted | 4 weeks | Participants |
| Primary | Bone Mineral Content of Whole Body (Excluding Head) | Whole body (excluding head) BMC will be measured in grams | Not Posted | 4 weeks | Participants |
| Primary | Areal Bone Mineral Density of Femur | Areal bone mineral density of femur will be measured in grams/cm2 | Not Posted | 4 weeks | Participants |
| Primary | Areal Bone Mineral Density of Total Body (Excluding Head) | Areal bone mineral density of total body (excluding head) will be measured in grams/cm2 | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | g/cm2 | 4 weeks |
|
|
|
| Primary | Volumetric Bone Mineral Density of Lumbar Spine | Volumetric bone mineral density of lumbar spine (L2 to L4) in grams/cm3 | Not Posted | 4 weeks | Participants |
| Primary | Range of Right Hip Flexion | measure hip flexion in supine using goniometer in degrees | Not Posted | 4 weeks | Participants |
| Primary | Range of Left Hip Flexion | measure hip flexion in supine using goniometer in degrees | Not Posted | 4 weeks | Participants |
| Primary | Range of Right Hip Extension | measure hip extension in prone using goniometer in degrees | Not Posted | 4 weeks | Participants |
| Primary | Range of Left Hip Extension | measure hip extension in prone using goniometer in degrees | Not Posted | 4 weeks | Participants |
| Primary | Range of Right Hip Abduction | measure hip abduction in supine using goniometer in degrees | Not Posted | 4 weeks | Participants |
| Primary | Range of Left Hip Abduction | measure hip abduction in supine using goniometer in degrees | Not Posted | 4 weeks | Participants |
| Primary | Range of Right Knee Flexion | measure knee flexion in prone using goniometer in degrees | Not Posted | 4 weeks | Participants |
| Primary | Range of Left Knee Flexion | measure knee flexion in prone using goniometer in degrees | Not Posted | 4 weeks | Participants |
| Primary | Range of Right Knee Extension | measure knee extension in sitting using goniometer in degrees | Not Posted | 4 weeks | Participants |
| Primary | Range of Left Knee Extension | measure knee extension in sitting using goniometer in degrees | Not Posted | 4 weeks | Participants |
| Primary | Range of Right Ankle Dorsiflexion | measure ankle dorsiflexion in sitting using goniometer in degrees | Not Posted | 4 weeks | Participants |
| Primary | Range of Left Ankle Dorsiflexion | measure ankle dorsiflexion in sitting using goniometer in degrees | Not Posted | 4 weeks | Participants |
| Primary | Range of Right Ankle Plantarflexion | measure ankle plantarflexion in sitting using goniometer in degrees | Not Posted | 4 weeks | Participants |
| Primary | Range of Left Ankle Plantarflexion | measure ankle plantarflexion in sitting using goniometer in degrees | Not Posted | 4 weeks | Participants |
| Primary | Muscle Strength of Right Hip Flexors | measure muscle strength of hip flexors in supine using dynamometer in terms of Newton | Not Posted | 4 weeks | Participants |
| Primary | Muscle Strength of Left Hip Flexors | measure muscle strength of hip flexors in supine using dynamometer in terms of Newton | Not Posted | 4 weeks | Participants |
| Primary | Muscle Strength of Right Hip Extensors | measure muscle strength of hip extensors in prone using dynamometer in terms of Newton | Not Posted | 4 weeks | Participants |
| Primary | Muscle Strength of Left Hip Extensors | measure muscle strength of hip extensors in prone using dynamometer in terms of Newton | Not Posted | 4 weeks | Participants |
| Primary | Muscle Strength of Right Knee Flexors | measure muscle strength of knee flexors in sitting using dynamometer in terms of Newton | Not Posted | 4 weeks | Participants |
| Primary | Muscle Strength of Left Knee Flexors | measure muscle strength of knee flexors in sitting using dynamometer in terms of Newton | Not Posted | 4 weeks | Participants |
| Primary | Muscle Strength of Right Knee Extensors | measure muscle strength of knee extensors in sitting using dynamometer in terms of Newton | Not Posted | 4 weeks | Participants |
| Primary | Muscle Strength of Left Knee Extensors | measure muscle strength of knee extensors in sitting using dynamometer in terms of Newton | Not Posted | 4 weeks | Participants |
| Primary | Muscle Strength of Right Hip Abductors | measure muscle strength of hip abductors in supine using dynamometer in terms of Newton | Not Posted | 4 weeks | Participants |
| Primary | Muscle Strength of Left Hip Abductors | measure muscle strength of hip abductors in supine using dynamometer in terms of Newton | Not Posted | 4 weeks | Participants |
| Primary | Muscle Strength of Right Ankle Dorsiflexors | measure muscle strength of ankle dorsiflexors in sitting using dynamometer in terms of Newton | Not Posted | 4 weeks | Participants |
| Primary | Muscle Strength of Left Ankle Dorsiflexors | measure muscle strength of ankle dorsiflexors in sitting using dynamometer in terms of Newton | Not Posted | 4 weeks | Participants |
| Primary | Muscle Strength of Right Ankle Plantarflexors | measure muscle strength of ankle plantarflexors in sitting using dynamometer in terms of Newton | Not Posted | 4 weeks | Participants |
| Primary | Muscle Strength of Left Ankle Plantarflexors | measure muscle strength of ankle plantarflexors in sitting using dynamometer in terms of Newton | Not Posted | 4 weeks | Participants |
| Secondary | Percentage of Attendance of Participants | record the percentage of attendance and comments during the intervention | Posted | Number | percentage of attendance | 4 weeks |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Visual Analogue Scale | record discomfort during the intervention in a scale of 0 (no discomfort) to 10 (maximal discomfort). | Posted | Number | score on a scale | 4 weeks |
|
|
|
| Primary | Segmental Assessment of Trunk Control_active | assess the segmental trunk control in sitting position with an ordinal score will be given in active trunk control. Assessment score represents as follows: 1= learning head control, 2= learning upper thoracic control, 3= learning mid-thoracic control, 4= learning lower thoracic control, 5= learning at upper lumber control, 6= learning lower lumbar control, 7= learning full trunk control and 8= achieved full trunk control. | Posted | Median | Inter-Quartile Range | score on a scale | 4 weeks |
|
|
|
| Primary | Segmental Assessment of Trunk Control-reactive | assess the segmental trunk control in sitting position with an ordinal score will be given in reactive trunk control. Assessment score represents as follows: 1= learning head control, 2= learning upper thoracic control, 3= learning mid-thoracic control, 4= learning lower thoracic control, 5= learning at upper lumber control, 6= learning lower lumbar control, 7= learning full trunk control and 8= achieved full trunk control. | Posted | Median | Inter-Quartile Range | score on a scale | 4 weeks |
|
|
|
| 0 |
| 1 |
| 0 |
| 1 |
| 0 |
| 1 |
Not provided
Not provided
| D019636 | Neurodegenerative Diseases |
| D016472 | Motor Neuron Disease |
| D009468 | Neuromuscular Diseases |
| D030342 | Genetic Diseases, Inborn |
| D009358 | Congenital, Hereditary, and Neonatal Diseases and Abnormalities |
| Title | Measurements |
|---|---|
|