Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Inadequate recruitment
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The goal of this study is to learn more about liver fibrosis and methods to detect it. We will evaluate and compare multiple MRI based measures of liver fibrosis in subjects with and without liver disease.
While liver biopsy is still considered the gold standard for diagnosing and assessing the presence and degree of liver fibrosis and inflammation, it has disadvantages including the potential for sampling error and risk of complications, including life-threatening bleeding. New imaging modalities such as MR Elastography, T1 mapping, T2 mapping, T1 rho, and magnetization transfer allow rapid, non-invasive evaluation of liver parenchymal characteristics and may be able to detect and quantify parenchymal fibrosis alleviating the need for biopsy. To date, the quantitative performance of these different techniques has not been extensively studied. This study is a single-center trial of non-invasive MR imaging techniques aimed at detecting and measuring liver fibrosis. Once optimized, these technologies may later be deployed in hypothesis driven research studies and/or routine clinical exams in the pediatric population here at CCHMC and/or as part of a multi-center study with specific IRB approval for that project.
To assess the relative performance of each technique, correlation across techniques, and reproducibility across the range of fibrosis, 32 subjects will be enrolled in this preliminary study sub-divided into 4 groups (Group 1: Healthy/ Normal controls; Group 2: F1/F2 fibrosis as determined by prior biopsy (low grade fibrosis group); Group 3: F3/F4 fibrosis as determined by prior biopsy (high grade fibrosis group), Group 4: Hepatic steatosis with fibrosis (NAFLD group)). 8 healthy subjects without known or suspected liver disease will be enrolled as normal controls. 8 subjects each with known fibrosis based on liver biopsy within the last 6 months will be enrolled in Group 2 and Group 3 (total = 16). 8 subjects with known hepatic steatosis and liver fibrosis based on liver biopsy within the last 6 months will be enrolled in Group 4.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Health/Normal Controls | Active Comparator | Health/normal control subjects will undergo MRI using several different imaging sequences (MR Elastography, T1 mapping, T2 mapping, T1 rho, and magnetization transfer) designed to detect and quantify hepatic fibrosis. |
|
| F1/F2 fibrosis | Active Comparator | Type 1 and 2 liver fibrosis subjects will undergo MRI using several different imaging sequences (MR Elastography, T1 mapping, T2 mapping, T1 rho, and magnetization transfer) designed to detect and quantify hepatic fibrosis. |
|
| F3/F4 fibrosis | Active Comparator | Type 2 and 3 liver fibrosis subjects will undergo MRI using several different imaging sequences (MR Elastography, T1 mapping, T2 mapping, T1 rho, and magnetization transfer) designed to detect and quantify hepatic fibrosis. |
|
| Hepatic steatosis with fibrosis | Active Comparator | Hepatic steatosis with liver fibrosis subjects will undergo MRI using several different imaging sequences (MR Elastography, T1 mapping, T2 mapping, T1 rho, and magnetization transfer) designed to detect and quantify hepatic fibrosis. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MRI | Device | MRI scan performed on 1.5T Philips Ingenia MRI scanner. |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| MR imaging vs. histologic scoring in hepatic fibrosis | Correlate the results from the different imaging sequences designed to detect and quantify hepatic fibrosis | 2 years |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| MRI reproducibility | evaluate the reproducibility of each of the tested MRI-based liver fibrosis quantification sequences | 2 years |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria
Group 1:
Groups 2 and 3:
Group 4:
Exclusion Criteria
All subjects:
Group 1
Group 2 and 3
Group 4
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center | Cincinnati | Ohio | 45229 | United States |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 23932281 | Background | Sporea I, Bota S, Jurchis A, Sirli R, Gradinaru-Tascau O, Popescu A, Ratiu I, Szilaski M. Acoustic radiation force impulse and supersonic shear imaging versus transient elastography for liver fibrosis assessment. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2013 Nov;39(11):1933-41. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2013.05.003. Epub 2013 Aug 9. | |
| 24064151 | Background |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D008103 | Liver Cirrhosis |
| D005234 | Fatty Liver |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D008107 | Liver Diseases |
| D004066 | Digestive System Diseases |
| D005355 | Fibrosis |
| D010335 | Pathologic Processes |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Xanthakos SA, Podberesky DJ, Serai SD, Miles L, King EC, Balistreri WF, Kohli R. Use of magnetic resonance elastography to assess hepatic fibrosis in children with chronic liver disease. J Pediatr. 2014 Jan;164(1):186-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2013.07.050. Epub 2013 Sep 21. |
| D013568 |
| Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |