Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The purpose of the study is to study the effect of anatomical direct insertion ACL reconstruction compared with conventional anatomical ACL reconstruction.
The investigators divide 320 patients with ACL rupture into 4 groups, each group has 80 patients. The operation technique is different among the groups: group A: conventional anatomical double bundle acl reconstruction, group B: conventional anatomical single bundle acl reconstruction, group DA: direct insertion double bundle acl reconstruction, group DSB: direct insertion single bundle acl reconstruction. The investigators compare the results of the patients of each group at 2 years of surgery.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| direct insertion single bundle ACLR | Active Comparator | Patients with ACL rupture undergo direct insertion anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using single bundle technique. |
|
| anatomical double bundle ACLR | Experimental | Patients with ACL rupture undergo double bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. |
|
| anatomical single bundle ACLR | Experimental | Patients with ACL rupture undergo single bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. |
|
| direct insertion double bundle ACLR | Active Comparator | Patients with ACL rupture undergo direct insertion anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using double bundle technique. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| direct insertion anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction | Procedure | ACL reconstruction based on direct insertion of ACL. |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Lysholm score of the knee | Lysholm score of the knee was evaluated preoperatively and at 2 years post operation . Scale name:score | two years |
| Tegner score of the knee | Tegner score of the knee was evaluated preoperatively and at 2 years post operation . Scale name:score | two years |
| IKDC score of the knee | IKDC score of the knee was evaluated preoperatively and at 2 years post operation . Scale name:score | two years |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| KT-2000 of the knee | KT-2000 of the knee was evaluated preoperatively and at 2 years post operation. | two years |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yu Jia-Kuo, MD | Contact | 86-10-82267392 | yujiakuo@126.com | |
| Liu Yang, MD | Contact | 86-10-82267019 | surgeonliuyang@sina.com |
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Jia-Kuo Yu, MD | Peking University Third Hospital | Study Chair |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| single bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction | Procedure | anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using single bundle technique |
|
| double bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction | Procedure | anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using double bundle technique |
|
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000070598 | Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D007718 | Knee Injuries |
| D007869 | Leg Injuries |
| D014947 | Wounds and Injuries |
Not provided
Not provided