Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The purpose of this study is to compare double-bundle and single-bundle techniques for ACL reconstruction in a long-term 15-year follow-up. Our hypothesis is that the DB technique is better than the SB technique.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Double-bundle | Active Comparator |
| |
| Single-bundle | Active Comparator |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ACL reconstruction: Double bundle | Procedure | DB: Two tunnels were created on the femoral side through an anteromedial portal. These tunnels were created manually. On the tibial side, the tunnels were created using a guide to ensure they matched the anatomic insertion site of the ACL at the tibia. The hamstring grafts for the procedure were then harvested from the same leg and doubled. The femoral side was fixed from the inside out, whereas the tibial side was fixed from the outside in. bioresorbable screws were used. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| osteoarthritis (OA) | which group has more osteoarthritis? Kellgren Lawrence classification. Scale 0-4 (0=no OA) | 15 years |
| Pivot shift | which group has more positive pivot shift tests? Always compared to a "healthy" knee. | 15 years |
| KT-1000 arthrometer difference | Anteroposterior translation. Always compared to a "healthy" knee. mm. | 15 years |
| Lysholm score | subjective evaluation form. Scale 0-100 (100=best) | 15 years |
| IKDC subjective evaluation. Scale 0-100 (100=best) | subjective evaluation form | 15 years |
| IKDC objective score. Scale 1-4 (1=best) | Overall evaluation of the knee | 15 years |
| graft failures | which group has more graft failures? The number of graft failures was assessed by revision surgery. | 15 years |
| Range on motion (ROM) of the knee | Which group has more lack of knee extension or lack of knee flexion? Injured knee is always compared to a contralateral "healthy" knee. Measurements were performed with a goniometer. ROM included lack of passive extension (normal < 3°, nearly normal 3-5°, abnormal 6-10°, and severely abnormal > 10°) and lack of passive flexion (normal 0-5°, nearly normal 6-15°, abnormal 16-25°, and severely abnormal > 25°). |
Not provided
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
-
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Department of Orthopaedics, Tampere University Hospital | Tampere | Finland |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000070598 | Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D007718 | Knee Injuries |
| D007869 | Leg Injuries |
| D014947 | Wounds and Injuries |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| ACL reconstruction: Single bundle | Procedure | SB: The femoral tunnel was created using an anteromedial portal. A freehand technique was used. For the tibial tunnel, a tibial guide was used to ensure it was positioned at the midpoint of the tibial ACL attachment site. The tendons of the semitendinosus and gracilis muscles were then harvested, doubled over, and inserted through the tibial tunnel, extending into the femur, and fixed with metallic or bioabsorbable interference screws. |
|
| 15 years |
| One leg hop test | One leg hop test was performed to assess the functional capacity of the knee. The patient hopped a maximum length three times on each leg separately and the best result was recorded for both legs. The result of the operated leg was then compared with that of the non-operated leg. | 15 years |