Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The aim of this prospective cohort study is to compare the esthetic, clinical and patient-centered outcomes following immediate and delayed implant placement protocols.
Patients are divided into two groups: immediate and delayed implant placement. The investigators are asking subjects to take part in a research study of soft tissue and bone healing around dental implants following tooth extraction. The investigators want to compare how the gums and the bone changes shape with healing in two different scenarios.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type 1 implant placement | Active Comparator | Implant is placed immediately following tooth extraction in one surgical procedure |
|
| Type 3 implant placement | Active Comparator | Implant is placed in the site which is left to heal for 3 months following tooth extraction |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Type 1 implant placement | Procedure | Implant is placed immediately following tooth extraction in one surgical procedure |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Pink and white esthetic scores (PES/WES) | Baseline will be at the time of implant placement.Pink and white esthetic scores (PES/WES) will be recorded at 0.5, 1.5, 3.5, 5.5, 7.5, 10.5 years after implant placement. | Up to 10 years after baseline |
| Radiographic bone volume | Radiographic bone volume be assessed at pre-operation, 0 ,1.5, 1, 1.5, 3.5, 5.5, 7.5, 10.5 years after implant placement. | Up to 10 years after baseline |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Implant survival | Implant survival will be assessed at 0.5, 1, 1.5, 3.5, 5.5, 7.5, 10.5 years after implant placement. | Up to 10 years after baseline |
| Probing depth | Probing depth will be assessed at pre-operation, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 3.5, 5.5, 7.5, 10.5 years after implant placement. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Xin Liu | Contact | +8615902064014 | 838667172@163.com | |
| Baoxin Huang | Contact | +8615820219260 | dentisthbx@163.com |
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Zhuofan Chen | Sun Yat-sen University | Study Director |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guanghua School of Stomatology Hospital of Stomatology | Recruiting | Guangzhou | Guangdong | 510000 | China |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 25496243 | Background | Rieder D, Eggert J, Krafft T, Weber HP, Wichmann MG, Heckmann SM. Impact of placement and restoration timing on single-implant esthetic outcome - a randomized clinical trial. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2016 Feb;27(2):e80-6. doi: 10.1111/clr.12539. Epub 2014 Dec 12. | |
| 25758100 | Background | Huynh-Ba G, Meister DJ, Hoders AB, Mealey BL, Mills MP, Oates TW, Cochran DL, Prihoda TJ, McMahan CA. Esthetic, clinical and patient-centered outcomes of immediately placed implants (Type 1) and early placed implants (Type 2): preliminary 3-month results of an ongoing randomized controlled clinical trial. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2016 Feb;27(2):241-52. doi: 10.1111/clr.12577. Epub 2015 Mar 10. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D007576 | Jaw, Edentulous, Partially |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D007575 | Jaw, Edentulous |
| D007571 | Jaw Diseases |
| D009140 | Musculoskeletal Diseases |
| D009057 | Stomatognathic Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Type 3 implant placement | Procedure | Implant is placed in the site which is left to heal for 3 months following tooth extraction |
|
|
| Up to 10 years after baseline |
| Modified plaque index | Modified plaque index will be assessed at pre-operation, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 3.5, 5.5, 7.5, 10.5 years after implant placement. | Up to 10 years after baseline |
| Modified bleeding index | Modified bleeding index will be assessed at pre-operation, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 3.5, 5.5, 7.5, 10.5 years after implant placement. | Up to 10 years after baseline |
| Buccal marginal recession | Buccal marginal recession will be assessed at pre-operation, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 3.5, 5.5, 7.5, 10.5 years after implant placement. | Up to 10 years after baseline |
| Papilla volume | Papilla volume will be assessed at 0.5, 1, 1.5, 3.5, 5.5, 7.5, 10.5 years after implant placement. | Up to 10 years after baseline |
| Width of keratinized gingiva | Width of keratinized gingiva will be assessed at 0.5, 1, 1.5, 3.5, 5.5, 7.5, 10.5 years after implant placement. | Up to 10 years after baseline |
| Visual analogue scale (VAS) | A questionnaire will be recorded at pre-operation, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 3.5, 5.5, 7.5, 10.5 years after implant placement. | Up to 10 years after baseline |
| Oral health impact profile shortened version (OHIP-I) | A questionnaire will be recorded at pre-operation, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 3.5, 5.5, 7.5, 10.5 years after implant placement. | Up to 10 years after baseline |
| D009066 |
| Mouth, Edentulous |
| D009059 | Mouth Diseases |
| D014076 | Tooth Diseases |