Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This study examines the short- and long-term-effects of different repeated frames in which an exercise program is offered on behavior (i.e., frequency of exercise) and motivation (i.e., autonomous/controlled) in older people (65+). The frames are manipulated experimentally as either prevention focused (e.g., to prevent worse health), promotion focused (e.g., to gain better health) or neutral (control condition).
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Prevention | Experimental | Regulatory frame: prevention |
|
| Promotion | Experimental | Regulatory frame: promotion |
|
| Neutral | Sham Comparator | Regulatory frame: not implied |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Regulatory frame: prevention | Behavioral | Exercise program presented as preventing deterioration. |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Behavior at long term: exercise frequency during third week | self-reported no exercise sessions | third week |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change in controlled motivation over long term: end week 3 - baseline | baseline, end week 3 (BREQ-2 questionnaire) | 3 weeks |
| Change in autonomous motivation over long term: end week 3 - baseline |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Functionality: sit to stand/sit: flexion, extension, stand and sit duration (time) | (Dynaport) | week 1/week 2/week 3 |
| Functionality: sit to stand/sit: angular velocity flexion and extension (degrees/sec) |
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Department of Kinesiology | Heverlee | Vlaams-Brabant | 3001 | Belgium |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 30777017 | Derived | Vanroy J, Seghers J, van Uffelen J, Boen F. Can a framed intervention motivate older adults in assisted living facilities to exercise? BMC Geriatr. 2019 Feb 18;19(1):46. doi: 10.1186/s12877-019-1060-z. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Regulatory frame: promotion | Behavioral | Exercise program presented as promoting improvement. |
|
| Regulatory frame: not implied | Behavioral | Exercise program presented without implied consequences. |
|
baseline, end week 3 (BREQ-2 questionnaire)
| 3 weeks |
| Change in controlled motivation over short term: end week 1 - baseline | baseline, end week 1 (BREQ-2 questionnaire) | 1 week |
| Change in autonomous motivation over short term: end week 1 - baseline | baseline, end week 1 (BREQ-2 questionnaire) | 1 week |
| Behavior at short term: exercise frequency during first week | self-reported no exercise sessions | first week |
(Dynaport)
| week 1/week 2/week 3 |
| Functionality: sit to stand/sit: range flexion and extension (degrees) | (Dynaport) | week 1/week 2/week 3 |
| Functionality: SPPB (Short Physical Performance Battery) score | (Dynaport) | week 1/week 2/week 3 |
| Functionality: SPPB balance score | (Dynaport) | week 1/week 2/week 3 |
| Functionality: SPPB gait speed score | (Dynaport) | week 1/week 2/week 3 |
| Functionality: SPPB chair stand score | (Dynaport) | week 1/week 2/week 3 |
| Functionality: sway acceleration (mG) | (Dynaport) | week 1/week 2/week 3 |
| Functionality: sway velocity (mm/sec) | (Dynaport) | week 1/week 2/week 3 |
| Functionality: sway path (mm/sec) | (Dynaport) | week 1/week 2/week 3 |
| Functionality: sway normalized area (mm²/sec) | (Dynaport) | week 1/week 2/week 3 |