Effect of Lens Presentation on the Clinical Oculomotor Assessment at Near
Effect of Lens Presentation on the Clinical Oculomotor Assessment at Near
This study will compare near clinical oculomotor parameters (heterophoria, vergence ranges, AC/A and accommodative findings) measured when lenses and/or prisms are introduced using three different instruments namely: (i) a standard manual phoropter, (ii) an electronic phoropter and (iii) a wearable adaptive refractor (VisionFit).
Previous studies have demonstrated differences in a number of near oculomotor parameters [e.g., heterophoria, accommodative convergence to accommodation (AC/A) ratio] when measured in a manual phoropter versus a trial frame. These differences may be due to variations in proximal vergence, differences in head and eye position and restriction of the peripheral visual field. Further, a number of standard clinical oculomotor procedures require the use of Risley rotary prisms. While prism is typically introduced in a smooth, ramp-like fashion with manual phoropters, step changes in prism are created with electronic phoropters. The precise effect of these variations on clinical measurements is unclear. Accordingly, after a routine refractive examination, a standard clinical near assessment (comprising near heterophoria, AC/A ratio, horizontal vergence ranges, amplitude of accommodation and negative and positive relative accommodation) will be carried out on the same individuals through: (i) a standard manual phoropter (American Optical model 11625), (ii) an electronic phoropter (Topcon CV-5000) and (iii) a wearable adaptive refractor (VisionFit). The latter resembles a trial frame mounted on a helmet carrier (similar to a binocular indirect ophthalmoscope headset) but includes adaptive lenses that can be changed electronically.
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria: