Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Universidad Católica San Antonio de Murcia | OTHER |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
50 children between 4 and 7 years old with moderate to severe motor impairment, 50% males 50% females will participate in an interventional study in two groups: placebo and experimental group.
Placebo group will only receive traditional treatment with physiotherapy and the Experimental or tRNS Group will receive physiotherapy plus tRNS BrainNoninvasive Stimulation.
In this Interventional Study with Double Blind Assignment to Placebo and Experimental Group, Gross Motor Function Measure (GMFM) and Neurophysiological are the parameters measured with EEG amplifier before and after 30 sessions.
Work hypothesis is that the tRNS Group will present better motor functionality after 30 sessions of 30 minutes of duration of electrical brain stimulation administered during physiotherapy exercises 2 days per week than the Group that only receives treatment with physiotherapy during 30 minutes 2 days per week without tRNS.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo Group | Placebo Comparator | Receive treatment with physiotherapy |
|
| Experimental or tRNS Group | Experimental | Receive treatment with physiotherapy plus Transcranial Random Noise Stimulation (tRNS) |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Transcranial Random Noise Stimulation | Device | A special Helmet supply weak electrical currents in the head |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Gross Motor Function Measure (GMFM) as measured by the Gross Motor Function scale | Motor Functionality Scale | Up to five months |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Differences in Power Fast Fourier Transformation before and after intervention | Changes in Power in EEG over different electrodes | up to five months |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Moises Aguilar Domingo, PhD | Fundación Española para el Desarrollo de la Neurometria (Brainmech) | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| New Remedies | Liverpool | Merseyside | L1 0AH | United Kingdom |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 25337347 | Background | Bashir S, Yoo WK. Cheap Technology Like Transcrinal Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) Could Help in Stroke Rehabilitation in South Asia. Basic Clin Neurosci. 2013 Summer;4(3):188-9. No abstract available. | |
| 21343407 | Background | Stagg CJ, Nitsche MA. Physiological basis of transcranial direct current stimulation. Neuroscientist. 2011 Feb;17(1):37-53. doi: 10.1177/1073858410386614. |
| Label | URL |
|---|---|
| Neurometrics | View source |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001930 | Brain Injuries |
| D019957 | Motor Skills Disorders |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001927 | Brain Diseases |
| D002493 | Central Nervous System Diseases |
| D009422 | Nervous System Diseases |
| D006259 | Craniocerebral Trauma |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D065908 | Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation |
| D026741 | Physical Therapy Modalities |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D004599 | Electric Stimulation Therapy |
| D013812 | Therapeutics |
| D003295 | Convulsive Therapy |
| D013000 | Psychiatric Somatic Therapies |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Physiotherapy | Other | Standard of care physiotherapy aimed to the motor impairment the subject presents |
|
| 20870863 | Result | Benninger DH, Lomarev M, Lopez G, Wassermann EM, Li X, Considine E, Hallett M. Transcranial direct current stimulation for the treatment of Parkinson's disease. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2010 Oct;81(10):1105-11. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.2009.202556. |
| 16809569 | Result | Fregni F, Boggio PS, Valle AC, Rocha RR, Duarte J, Ferreira MJ, Wagner T, Fecteau S, Rigonatti SP, Riberto M, Freedman SD, Pascual-Leone A. A sham-controlled trial of a 5-day course of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of the unaffected hemisphere in stroke patients. Stroke. 2006 Aug;37(8):2115-22. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000231390.58967.6b. Epub 2006 Jun 29. |
| 24391599 | Result | Vanneste S, Fregni F, De Ridder D. Head-to-Head Comparison of Transcranial Random Noise Stimulation, Transcranial AC Stimulation, and Transcranial DC Stimulation for Tinnitus. Front Psychiatry. 2013 Dec 18;4:158. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2013.00158. eCollection 2013. |
| 17068786 | Result | Fregni F, Otachi PT, Do Valle A, Boggio PS, Thut G, Rigonatti SP, Pascual-Leone A, Valente KD. A randomized clinical trial of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in patients with refractory epilepsy. Ann Neurol. 2006 Oct;60(4):447-55. doi: 10.1002/ana.20950. |
| 22031888 | Result | Fertonani A, Pirulli C, Miniussi C. Random noise stimulation improves neuroplasticity in perceptual learning. J Neurosci. 2011 Oct 26;31(43):15416-23. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2002-11.2011. |
| 16270180 | Result | Ilyukhina VA, Kozhushko NY, Matveev YK, Ponomareva EA, Chernysheva EM, Shaptilei MA. Transcranial micropolarization in the combined therapy of speech and general psychomotor retardation in children of late preschool age. Neurosci Behav Physiol. 2005 Nov;35(9):969-76. doi: 10.1007/s11055-005-0153-7. |
| 23630476 | Result | McCleery JP, Elliott NA, Sampanis DS, Stefanidou CA. Motor development and motor resonance difficulties in autism: relevance to early intervention for language and communication skills. Front Integr Neurosci. 2013 Apr 24;7:30. doi: 10.3389/fnint.2013.00030. eCollection 2013. |
| 20522259 | Result | Mueller A, Candrian G, Kropotov JD, Ponomarev VA, Baschera GM. Classification of ADHD patients on the basis of independent ERP components using a machine learning system. Nonlinear Biomed Phys. 2010 Jun 3;4 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S1. doi: 10.1186/1753-4631-4-S1-S1. |
| 21771289 | Result | Mueller A, Candrian G, Grane VA, Kropotov JD, Ponomarev VA, Baschera GM. Discriminating between ADHD adults and controls using independent ERP components and a support vector machine: a validation study. Nonlinear Biomed Phys. 2011 Jul 19;5:5. doi: 10.1186/1753-4631-5-5. |
| 10990547 | Result | Nitsche MA, Paulus W. Excitability changes induced in the human motor cortex by weak transcranial direct current stimulation. J Physiol. 2000 Sep 15;527 Pt 3(Pt 3):633-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7793.2000.t01-1-00633.x. |
| 11723286 | Result | Nitsche MA, Paulus W. Sustained excitability elevations induced by transcranial DC motor cortex stimulation in humans. Neurology. 2001 Nov 27;57(10):1899-901. doi: 10.1212/wnl.57.10.1899. |
| 12686268 | Result | Nitsche MA, Nitsche MS, Klein CC, Tergau F, Rothwell JC, Paulus W. Level of action of cathodal DC polarisation induced inhibition of the human motor cortex. Clin Neurophysiol. 2003 Apr;114(4):600-4. doi: 10.1016/s1388-2457(02)00412-1. |
| 17251360 | Result | Nitsche MA, Doemkes S, Karakose T, Antal A, Liebetanz D, Lang N, Tergau F, Paulus W. Shaping the effects of transcranial direct current stimulation of the human motor cortex. J Neurophysiol. 2007 Apr;97(4):3109-17. doi: 10.1152/jn.01312.2006. Epub 2007 Jan 24. |
| 20633386 | Result | Nitsche MA, Cohen LG, Wassermann EM, Priori A, Lang N, Antal A, Paulus W, Hummel F, Boggio PS, Fregni F, Pascual-Leone A. Transcranial direct current stimulation: State of the art 2008. Brain Stimul. 2008 Jul;1(3):206-23. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2008.06.004. Epub 2008 Jul 1. |
| 21819181 | Result | Paulus W. Transcranial electrical stimulation (tES - tDCS; tRNS, tACS) methods. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2011 Oct;21(5):602-17. doi: 10.1080/09602011.2011.557292. Epub 2011 Aug 5. |
| 9694210 | Result | Priori A, Berardelli A, Rona S, Accornero N, Manfredi M. Polarization of the human motor cortex through the scalp. Neuroreport. 1998 Jul 13;9(10):2257-60. doi: 10.1097/00001756-199807130-00020. |
| 17452283 | Result | Poreisz C, Boros K, Antal A, Paulus W. Safety aspects of transcranial direct current stimulation concerning healthy subjects and patients. Brain Res Bull. 2007 May 30;72(4-6):208-14. doi: 10.1016/j.brainresbull.2007.01.004. Epub 2007 Jan 24. |
| 19833552 | Result | Rossi S, Hallett M, Rossini PM, Pascual-Leone A; Safety of TMS Consensus Group. Safety, ethical considerations, and application guidelines for the use of transcranial magnetic stimulation in clinical practice and research. Clin Neurophysiol. 2009 Dec;120(12):2008-2039. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2009.08.016. Epub 2009 Oct 14. |
| 19064743 | Result | Schlaug G, Renga V, Nair D. Transcranial direct current stimulation in stroke recovery. Arch Neurol. 2008 Dec;65(12):1571-6. doi: 10.1001/archneur.65.12.1571. |
| 21631313 | Result | Schneider HD, Hopp JP. The use of the Bilingual Aphasia Test for assessment and transcranial direct current stimulation to modulate language acquisition in minimally verbal children with autism. Clin Linguist Phon. 2011 Jun;25(6-7):640-54. doi: 10.3109/02699206.2011.570852. Epub 2011 Jun 1. |
| 21072168 | Result | Zaehle T, Rach S, Herrmann CS. Transcranial alternating current stimulation enhances individual alpha activity in human EEG. PLoS One. 2010 Nov 1;5(11):e13766. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0013766. |
| D020196 | Trauma, Nervous System |
| D014947 | Wounds and Injuries |
| D065886 | Neurodevelopmental Disorders |
| D001523 | Mental Disorders |
| D004191 | Behavioral Disciplines and Activities |
| D004597 | Electroshock |
| D011580 | Psychological Techniques |
| D012046 | Rehabilitation |