Comparative Effects of Variable Pressure Support, Neurally Adjusted Ventilatory Assist (NAVA) and Proportional Assist Ventilation (PAV) on the Variability of the Breathing Pattern and on Patient Ventilator Interaction
Comparative Effects of Variable Pressure Support, Neurally Adjusted Ventilatory Assist (NAVA) and Proportional Assist Ventilation (PAV) on the Variability of the Breathing Pattern and on Patient Ventilator Interaction
Experimental animal data suggest that increasing breathing pattern variability in mechanical ventilation could be beneficial. Variable ventilation can be induced through the following modes: Neurally Adjust Ventilatory Assist (NAVA), Proportional Assist Ventilation (PAV) and Variable-Pressure Support Ventilation (V-PSV). These modes have not yet been compared to each other. Pilot observations in our department suggest a feasibility in patients.
The objectives of the study are to compare the impact of PSV, NAVA, PAV and V-PSV on the variability of the breathing pattern, patient-ventilator asynchrony, risk of lung overdistension, gas exchange, and repartition of ventilation.
Cross-over, prospective, randomized controlled monocentric trial . Patients on pressure support ventilation will be ventilated with PSV, NAVA, PAV, and V-PSV (in a randomized sequence).
In each mode the level of assistance will be set to achieve a similar tidal volume of 6-8 ml/kg.
The following data will be measured and recorded: airway flow and pressure, electrical activity of the diaphragm (EAdi), blood gases, electrical impedance tomography, end tidal partial pressure in carbon dioxide (PEtCO2).
Will be calculated: the coefficient of variation (CV, standard deviation (SD)/mean) of the peak pressure (Ppeak), EAdi and of the main descriptors of the breathing pattern, the prevalence of the main patient-ventilator asynchronies, the prevalence of tidal volume (VT) >10ml/kg, ventrodorsal repartition of ventilation and inhomogeneity index, dead space
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria: