Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The investigators will compare the success rates and time to successful IO access during simulated adult resuscitation.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| IO access | Other | Performed intraosseus access device during simulated cardiopulmonary resuscitation |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NIO Adult device | Device | IO access-1 |
|
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| time to IO needle insertion | time from picking up a intraosseous access device, to successful IO needle insertion in the bone | 1 day |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| time to IO needle stabilization | time from picking up a intraosseus access device to correct fixation IO needle | 1 day |
| time to intraosseuss infusion | begining with picking up a intraosseuss access device and ending with the IV line tubing was connected to the inseted IO needle |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Lukasz Szarpak | National Institute of Cardiology, Warsaw, Poland | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| International Institute of Rescue Research and Education | Warsaw | Masovia | 03-122 | Poland |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Bone Iniection Gun |
| Device |
IO access-2 |
|
|
| EZ-IO | Device | IO access-3 |
|
| Jamshidi Intraosseous Needle | Device | IO access-4 |
|
|
| Cook Intraosseous Needle | Device | IO access-5 |
|
|
| 1 day |
| Ease of use | To access subjective opinion about the difficulty of the procedure, participants were asked to rate it on a visual analogue scale (VAS) with a score from 1 (extremely easy) to 10 (extremely difficult). | 1 day |