Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Hospital Authority, Hong Kong | OTHER_GOV |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Hypertension (HT) is one of the major cause of morbidity and among the top 10 causes of deaths in Hong Kong in 2008 (Department of Health 2009). The Hospital Authority (HA) has initiated service improvement through introducing the risk assessment and management programme (RAMP) to improve the quality of care (QOC) for HT patients in general outpatient clinics (GOPC). The evaluation on the QOC is an essential part of the programme in order to inform future policy. The Department of Family Medicine and Primary Care (FMPC) of the University of Hong Kong (HKU) has been appointed by the HA to carry out the evaluation of the QOC of the programme.
The Action Learning and Audit Spiral methodologies to measure whether the target standard of care intended by the RAMP programme is achieved. Each RAMP participating clinic and hospital will be invited to complete a structured evaluation questionnaire. The data of all patients who have enrolled into the RAMP for more than one year will be included in the evaluation on the process and outcomes of care.
One thousand two hundred and forty-eight age and disease matched control patients who have not been enrolled into the RAMP programme will be selected for the comparison in the outcomes of care. A hundred and thirty participants will be followed up by telephone to evaluate the effect of the programme in quality of life (QOL), patient enablement, and global rating of change in health condition at baseline and 6 months after enrolment. Data on the process of care will be retrieved from the HA medical records.
Main Outcome Measures: The primary outcomes are the proportion of participants who have received the criterion process of care, and achieved the target blood pressure levels.
Data Analysis: Descriptive statistics on proportions of centers or subjects meeting the QOC criteria will be calculated. The changes in the clinical and patient reported outcomes of RAMP subjects will be compared at 12, 24, 36 and 48 months will be compared by paired sample t-test. The clinical outcomes between RAMP subjects and control group will be compared by independent sample t-test or Chi-square test.
Results: The QOC of the RAMP programme will be determined. Areas of deficiency and possible areas for quality enhancement will be identified.
Conclusion: The results of this study will provide empirical evidence on whether the HA's RAMP programme can achieve improvement in QOC for HT patients. The information will be used to guide service planning and policy decision making.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| RAMP-HT and Non-RAMP-HT |
Not provided
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| The proportion of clinics that have satisfied each of the structure criteria | Final analysis will evaluate the period from August, 2012 to December, 2014. | Three years |
| The proportion of patients who have complied with the criterion process of care. | Final analysis will evaluate the period from August, 2012 to December, 2014. | Three years |
| The proportion of patients who have achieved a BP level <140/90mmHg. | Final analysis will evaluate the period from August, 2012 to December, 2014. | Three years |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| LDL | Baseline and 12 months for each subject; the audit cycle will be repeated annually over a period of 3 years. | Three years |
| BMI (Body Mass Index) | Baseline and 12 months for each subject; the audit cycle will be repeated annually over a period of 3 years. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
All HT patients aged <80, without prior history of diabetes and existing cardiovascular diseases, with suboptimal BP control (average systolic blood pressure (SBP) ≥ 140mmHg or average diastolic blood pressure (DBP) ≥ 90mmHg) who were enrolled into RAMP-HT.
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Cindy L.K. Lam, MD | Department of Family Medicine and Primary Care, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong | Study Chair |
| Esther Y.T. Yu, MBBS | Department of Family Medicine and Primary Care, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The University of Hong Kong | Hong Kong Island | Hong Kong |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 26088560 | Result | Yu EY, Wan EY, Chan KH, Wong CK, Kwok RL, Fong DY, Lam CL. Evaluation of the quality of care of a multi-disciplinary Risk Factor Assessment and Management Programme for Hypertension (RAMP-HT). BMC Fam Pract. 2015 Jun 19;16:71. doi: 10.1186/s12875-015-0291-0. | |
| 37223900 | Derived | Yu EYT, Wan EYF, Mak IL, Chao DVK, Ko WWK, Leung M, Li YC, Liang J, Luk W, Wong MMY, Ha TKH, Chan AKC, Fong DYT, Lam CLK. Assessment of Hypertension Complications and Health Service Use 5 Years After Implementation of a Multicomponent Intervention. JAMA Netw Open. 2023 May 1;6(5):e2315064. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.15064. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D006973 | Hypertension |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D014652 | Vascular Diseases |
| D002318 | Cardiovascular Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Three years |
| Occurrence of First Cardiovascular Complication | Baseline and 12 months for each subject; the audit cycle will be repeated annually over a period of 3 years. | Three years |
| The change in SF-12v2 scores | Baseline and 6-month/12-month/24-month/36-month after the first administration of questionnaire. | Three years |
| PEI (Patient Enablement Index) | 6-month/12-month/24-month/36-month after the first administration of questionnaire. | Three years |
| GRS (Global Rating of Change Scale) scores | 6-month/12-month/24-month/36-month after the first administration of questionnaire. | Three years |