Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Grafting of autologous stromal cell trial is a prospective study comparing routine fat grafting versus stromal vascular fraction enriched fat grafting.
The purpose of this study is to objectively compare outcomes between autologous fat grafting breast augmentation and stromal vascular fraction enhanced autologous fat grafting for cosmetic breast augmentation in a carefully designed study.
Patients will be given the option of participating in one of two studies:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Level I | Active Comparator | A small, level I study will compare autologous fat grafting alone to stromal vascular fraction SVF enriched autologous fat grafting int he same patient. One breast will be treated with AFG alone and act as the control, and the other breast will be treated with SVF enriched AFG adn act as the experimental side exploring the efficacy of adipose derived stem cells. |
|
| Level II | Active Comparator | A larger, level II study comparing Autologous Fat Grafting to SVF enriched AFG in different patients. In this study, patients can choose to have AFG in both breasts or SVF enriched AFG in both breasts. The two patient groups will be compared. Here the group with the AFG in both breasts will be the control and the SVF enriched AFG in both breasts will be the experimental group exploring the efficacy of adipose derived stem cells. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Adipose Derived Stem Cells | Procedure | Adipose derived stem cells harvested from autologous lipoaspirate |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Comparing change from baseline to outcomes between autologous fat grafting alone and stromal vascular fraction enriched fat grafting for breast augmentation | Qualitative analysis of the breasts by a blind observer who will identify which breast is larger and looks better. | 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Evaluate short term and long term survival of fat grafting versus SVF enriched fat grafting | Qualitative analysis of the size of the breasts at different time points to evaluate fat retention. | 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| To define differences in indications, candidates, and populations that would benefit from fat grafting for breast enhancement versus traditional prosthetic augmentation | 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year |
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Oral or parenterally administered systemic corticosteroids within 30 days prior to the initial pain assessment period.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cloe S Hakakian, BS | Contact | 3106590705 | cloe@aronowitzmd.com | |
| Erin Welch, MA | Contact | 3106590705 | erin@aronowitzmd.com |
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Joel A Aronowitz, MD | Cedars-Sinai Medical Center | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| University Stem Cell Center | Recruiting | Los Angeles | California | 90048 | United States |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 24281640 | Background | Aronowitz JA, Ellenhorn JDI. Adipose stromal vascular fraction isolation: a head-to-head comparison of four commercial cell separation systems. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013 Dec;132(6):932e-939e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182a80652. | |
| 17102724 | Background | Atik B, Ozturk G, Erdogan E, Tan O. Comparison of techniques for long-term storage of fat grafts: an experimental study. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006 Dec;118(7):1533-1537. doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000240806.19404.a8. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| SVF Enriched Autologous Fat Grafting | Procedure | Cell assisted lipotransfer |
|
|
| 19912236 | Background | Yoshimura K, Asano Y, Aoi N, Kurita M, Oshima Y, Sato K, Inoue K, Suga H, Eto H, Kato H, Harii K. Progenitor-enriched adipose tissue transplantation as rescue for breast implant complications. Breast J. 2010 Mar-Apr;16(2):169-75. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4741.2009.00873.x. Epub 2009 Nov 12. |
| 21124131 | Background | Suga H, Eto H, Aoi N, Kato H, Araki J, Doi K, Higashino T, Yoshimura K. Adipose tissue remodeling under ischemia: death of adipocytes and activation of stem/progenitor cells. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010 Dec;126(6):1911-1923. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181f4468b. |
| 17763894 | Background | Yoshimura K, Sato K, Aoi N, Kurita M, Hirohi T, Harii K. Cell-assisted lipotransfer for cosmetic breast augmentation: supportive use of adipose-derived stem/stromal cells. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2008 Jan;32(1):48-55; discussion 56-7. doi: 10.1007/s00266-007-9019-4. Epub 2007 Sep 1. |
| 17415234 | Background | Rigotti G, Marchi A, Galie M, Baroni G, Benati D, Krampera M, Pasini A, Sbarbati A. Clinical treatment of radiotherapy tissue damage by lipoaspirate transplant: a healing process mediated by adipose-derived adult stem cells. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007 Apr 15;119(5):1409-1422. doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000256047.47909.71. |
| 17415252 | Background | Piasecki JH, Gutowski KA, Lahvis GP, Moreno KI. An experimental model for improving fat graft viability and purity. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007 Apr 15;119(5):1571-1583. doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000256062.74324.1c. |
| 16936550 | Background | Coleman SR. Structural fat grafting: more than a permanent filler. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006 Sep;118(3 Suppl):108S-120S. doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000234610.81672.e7. |
| 17312477 | Background | Coleman SR, Saboeiro AP. Fat grafting to the breast revisited: safety and efficacy. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007 Mar;119(3):775-85; discussion 786-7. doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000252001.59162.c9. |