Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This is a systematic review and Meta-Analysis of interventions for implementation of Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines and their impact on compliance and mortality reduction
The implementation of the sepsis resuscitation bundle recommended by the SSC guidelines has been shown to increase compliance and reduce mortality in several settings. Different implementation strategies have been utilized, including education, posters, reminders, audit and feedback, paper-based and electronic sepsis screening tools, clinical pathway and sepsis response teams. Different studies showed a considerable variation effect on compliance and mortality.It has been suggested that implantation strategies vary in there effect from low impact for human-based interventions such as education and training, rules and policies, reminders, checklists and double checks, however, reaching high effect for system based interventions like automation and computerization and forcing function. However, this has not been studied in relation to the implementation of SSC bundle. As such, many projects continue to invest on low-impact interventions with modest change in compliance and mortality. Multiple interventions were adopted by different centers worldwide to implement SSC guidelines. These interventions vary on their level of compliance and outcomes. The effectiveness of intervention if system oriented is more effective than human oriented. The hierarchy of effectiveness assigning forcing function intervention on the top of the pyramid and the training and education on the bottom.
The investigators hypothesize that interventions system based interventions are more likely to be more effective in improving the compliance with sepsis resuscitation bundle and in improving mortality.
The aim of this study is to assess the effectiveness of different interventions for implementation of Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines and their impact on compliance and mortality reduction.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Low intensity intervention | human oriented interventions with less consideration to the system based act including, but not limited to, education, training, sepsis profile and posters with protocol algorithms. | ||
| Intermediate intensity intervention | interventions that lie in between human oriented and system oriented Including, but not limited to, sepsis protocols, daily audits, feedback and clinical pathway | ||
| High intensity intervention | system based interventions with less involvement of human effect including, but not limited to, electronic alert systems and sepsis response team. |
Not provided
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Surviving Sepsis Campaign (SSC) Guidelines Compliance and Mortality | 2002 - 2014 (12 years) |
Not provided
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Any study or data
Exclusion Criteria:
Any study used other than SSC guidelines in sepsis management will be excluded.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Research articles
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D018805 | Sepsis |
| D010349 | Patient Compliance |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D007239 | Infections |
| D018746 | Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome |
| D007249 | Inflammation |
| D010335 | Pathologic Processes |
| D013568 | Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |
| D010342 | Patient Acceptance of Health Care |
| D000074822 | Treatment Adherence and Compliance |
| D015438 | Health Behavior |
| D001519 | Behavior |
Not provided
Not provided