Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The investigators study whether four equipotent combinations of propofol and remifentanil (as predicted by interaction models for "tolerance of laryngoscopy") result in identical haemodynamic conditions, independent of their relative different balance between the concentration of propofol and remifentanil.
In anesthesia, the synergistic interaction between hypnotics and opioids is applied daily to give adequate anesthesia and analgesia at significantly lower doses compared with the ones needed if only one drug was given to reach the same effect. A lot of research has been done to quantify these interactions with a focus on the desired effects (Tolerance of laryngoscopy, tolerance of shake and shout etc...), but the simultaneous interaction on the unwanted side effects is less well described. The response surface model of Bouillon et al. and other models predict combinations of propofol and remifentanil effect-site concentrations that lead to an equipotent desired effect. Due to the availability of the models, the anesthesiologists now could use the knowledge on interactions to target specific effects more accurately, using predefined equipotent combinations of drugs: for instance, a desirable 90% probability of tolerance of laryngoscopy (TOL90) in the population can be reached through either a high propofol/low remifentanil combination, but equally well through a low propofol-high remifentanil combination.
However, at this time it is not known whether some of the combinations of propofol and remifentanil have a favorable hemodynamic stability compared to other equipotent combinations. The researcher in this study want to determine whether equipotent combinations of remifentanil and propofol (all deliberately selected to evoke 90% probability of "tolerance to laryngoscopy"), result in different effects on the undesired side effects of anesthetics, such as hemodynamic instability (hypotension, changes in heart rate or cardiac output), decreases in cerebral or tissue oxygenation (both measured with near infrared spectroscopy).
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Group A propofol + remifentanil | Active Comparator | Propofol highest dose, remifentanil lowest dose, TOL 90% according to Bouillon model |
|
| Group B propofol + remifentanil | Active Comparator | Propofol intermediate high, remifentanil intermediate low, TOL90% according to the Bouillon Model |
|
| Group C propofol + remifentanil | Active Comparator | propofol intermediate low+ remifentanil intermediate high: TOL 90% according to the Bouillon interaction model |
|
| group D propofol + remifentanil | Active Comparator | propofol lowest dose+ remifentanil highest dose: TOL 90% according to the Bouillon model |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group A propofol + remifentanil | Drug | Predicted TOL90% according to Bouillon model |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Blood pressure | Continuously stored on a laptop (systolic, diastolic and mean blood pressure over time) using a Philips Non Invasive Blood Pressure measurements every minute and a Nexfin monitor (continuous non invasive blood pressure measurement) | From start drug till intubation which will take on average 15 minutes of measurement |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Electro Encephalographic derived indices of anesthetic depth | Bispectral index, Wavelet Transformation (WAV) index, Quantium Consciousness Index (qCON), Quantium Nociception Index (qNOX) to observe whether multiple electroencephalographic derived depth of anesthesia indices indicate the same equipotent effect in all 4 groups. All these measures are unitless values that range between 100 (for a fully responsive condition) and 0 (for a fully unresponsive condition). All these measures are extracted from the same frontal electroencephalogram but use different composite mathematical algorithms to translate the cortical state in numbers. We want to observe whether these composite algorithms measure consistent behavior between groups. This outcome is mainly ment as hypothesis generating for future research. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Hugo EM Vereecke, MD, PhD | University Hospital Medical center, university of groningen | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| University Medical Center Groningen | Groningen | Provincie Groningen | 9713EZ | Netherlands |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000077208 | Remifentanil |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D011422 | Propionates |
| D000144 | Acids, Acyclic |
| D002264 | Carboxylic Acids |
| D009930 | Organic Chemicals |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Group B propofol + remifentanil | Drug | TOL 90% according to the Bouillon interaction model |
|
|
| Group C propofol + remifentanil | Drug | TOL 90% according to the Bouillon interaction model |
|
|
| group D propofol + remifentanil | Drug | TOL 90% according to the Bouillon interaction model |
|
|
| From start first drug till intubation, which will take on average 15 minutes of measurement |
| Cerebral and tissue oxygenation | Continuously stored oxygenation saturation measured in tissue and cerebral cortex as measured by Near Infrared Spectrum Analysis (Forsyth monitor) and Inspectra monitor. Comparing differences between 4 groups with ANOVA. | From start drug till intubation, which will take on average 15 minutes of measurement |
| Heart rate | Difference in median/mean heart rate to determine differences between 4 groups with ANOVA. | From start first drug till intubation, which will take on average 15 minutes of measurement |
| Probability of tolerance to laryngoscopy | During pharmacological steady state of propofol/remifentanil, a laryngoscopy will be performed by one researcher and response or tolerance of the stimulus will be observed. A positive response will be defined as any somatic movement, swallowing or coughing during three minutes after laryngoscopy was applied. Also a increase in heart rate or systolic blood pressure of more than 20% from baseline values (one minute before laryngoscopy) will be defined as a positive response. Through PROBIT analysis we can plot the probability of response to laryngoscopy (%) as a function of respectively propofol or remifentanil drug concentrations. | one minute before laryngoscopy till three minutes after |
| Cardiac index | Non invasive estimation of Cardiac output and Cardiac index patterns through the Nexfin monitor. Determine the differences between groups through ANOVA. | From start first drug till intubation, which will take on average 15 minutes of measurement |
| D010880 |
| Piperidines |
| D006573 | Heterocyclic Compounds, 1-Ring |
| D006571 | Heterocyclic Compounds |