Effect of Strength Training and Protein Supplementation on the Muscle Function in Very Old Nursinghome Residents
Effect of Strength Training and Protein Supplementation on the Muscle Function in Very Old Nursinghome Residents
Three months intervention study, investigating the effect of nutrient supplementation (including 20g of milk protein) twice daily with or without additional heavy resistance exercise three times weekly on muscle size, structure and function in 30 subjects at least 83 years of age.
Primary hypothesis is that the group conducting exercise improves muscle size, structure and function.
A total of 30 subjects at least 83 years of age are recruited using advertisements in newspapers, magazines, public places and further personal contact. After information and written ethical consent (in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki II) health status is evaluated by a medical doctor including blood screening, screening for dementia and routine objective evaluation. If there is no reason to exclude subjects (see exclusion criteria), they are whole-body DXA-scanned (Dual X-ray Absorptiometry) and MR-scanned (Magnetic resonance imaging)(dominant knee and femur) and functional measures (30s chair-stand, 10m and 8m gait speed, DEMMI-test) and strength measures (isometric and isokinetic leg power, power rig, grip strength) and tendon stiffness are measured. At least 4 days after this the first muscle biopsy in the dominant m. vastus lateralis is taken. Hereafter subjects are randomized to one of two groups:
Group one (n=15) is the exercise and nutrition group (HRT). Subjects in this group are to conduct supervised center-based heavy resistance exercise of the lower extremities three times weekly for 12 weeks. As for group two, this group receives nutritional supplementation twice daily throughout the 12 weeks period. Supplementation contains 20g of milk protein and some carbohydrate and lipids.
Group two (n=15) is the nutrition group (PRO). Subjects in this group only receives nutritional supplementation as described above.
After 12 weeks of intervention the same strength- and functional measures are made, DXA- and MR-scans and a second biopsy is made along with tendon stiffness measurement.
Data is collected and analyzed by staff blinded to randomization. Personal data is locked up, and only anonymized data is analyzed. Differences in both primary (m. quadriceps femoris cross sectional area) and secondary outcomes (functional measures, strength measures, muscle cell- and fiber type count, mRNA expression, muscle collagen content and distribution) are evaluated using two-way anova with repeated measures and, if allowed, post-hoc tests. Analysis will be made as intention-to-treat.
Power:
With an expected 10% increase in quadriceps CSA (cross-sectional area) (from 4500 square mm at baseline) with a SD of 600 square mm, power is 82% with alfa 0.05 with inclusion of 15 subjects in each group.
In case of systematic health-issues in response to the intervention, the trial will end immediately.
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Copenhagen NV, Denmark 2400, Denmark