STRATEGY for Left Main Coronary Bifurcation Lesion II

A Prospective, Multi-center, Randomized Study to Evaluate the Optimal Strategy for Side Branch Treatment in Patients With Left Main Coronary Bifurcation Lesion

In patients with unprotected left main (LM) true bifurcation lesion (cohort A), elective 2-stent strategy is superior to provisional strategy at preventing the occurrence of 12-month target lesion failure after percutaneous coronary intervention for bifurcation lesion.

In patients with unprotected LM non-true bifurcation lesion (cohort B), 1-stent technique with mandatory final kissing ballooning is superior to 1-stent technique without kissing ballooning at preventing the occurrence of 12-month target lesion failure after percutaneous coronary intervention for bifurcation lesion.

Inclusion Criteria:

1. Age ≥20 years
2. Left main bifurcation lesion on coronary angiography
3. Significant myocardial ischemia Main vessel (left main coronary artery and left anterior descending artery) and/or side branch (left circumflex artery) diameter stenosis > 75%, or diameter stenosis 50-75% with angina and/or objective evidence of ischemia in the non-invasive stress test
4. Significant size of the main branch (left anterior descending artery) and side branch (left cirmflex artery) - The reference diameter of both branches ≥ 2.5 mm by visual estimation

Exclusion Criteria:

1. The patient has a known hypersensitivity or contraindication to any of the following medications: Heparin, Aspirin, Clopidogrel, Biolimus
2. Patients who have received DES implantation in the target lesion prior to enrollment