Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Goethe University | OTHER |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
In this split-mouth controlled study, implants placed using the alveolar ridge expansion technique will be compared to those placed in native bone with sufficient horizontal bone width.
The Piezosurgery device and Bone expanders (Mectron,Italy) will be employed in an alveolar ridge expansion technique.
The success rate of endosseous implant placement in native bone has been proven to be highly predictable. Reliable long term result requires sufficient bone thickness surrounding the implant's body. This is especially true in the maxillary aesthetic zone where buccal bone thickness of 2mm or more is necessary to prevent loss of buccal bone margin and maintain the integrity of the gingival architecture.
Ridge expansion technique, an alternative to bone graft, widens the alveolar ridge prior to implant placement, thus permits the preservation of buccal and lingual bone thickness.
Narrow atrophy edentulous alveolar ridges (study site) in the maxillary aesthetic zone will be split lengthwise using piezo-electric surgery (Piezosurgery, Mectron, USA). The prepared osteotomy will subsequently be expanded using threaded osteotomes (Bone Expanders, Mectron, Italy). Implants will immediately be inserted in the prepared osteotomy. In the edentulous alveolar ridges with sufficient thickness (controlled site) in the maxillary aesthetic zone, implants will be placed directly using conventional drilling technique. Outcome measures will be compared.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ridge Splitting | Experimental | Dental implants placed using ridge splitting technique. To measure the horizontal bone width before and after implant insertion and 6 months post-op. To measure BLI measured using PA radiographs taken immediately and 6 months post-op. To measure implant stability with the resonance frequency analyzer (Osstell,Osstell USA) at time of implant placement, 3 months and 6 months post-op. To measure implant success rate. The implants used in this study: NobelActive 3.5 - 4.3mm diameter, 10 - 13 mm in length. |
|
| Implants placed using drilling technique | Active Comparator | Dental implants placed in the ridge with sufficient thickness using drilling technique. To measure the horizontal bone width before and after implant insertion and 6 months post-op. To measure BLI measured using PA radiographs taken immediately and 6 months post-op. To measure implant stability with the resonance frequency analyzer (Osstell,Osstell USA) at time of implant placement, 3 months and 6 months post-op. To measure implant success rate. The implants used in this study: NobelActive 3.5-4.3mm diameter, 10 - 13 mm in length. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ridge Splitting | Procedure | To measure the horizontal bone width before and after implant insertion and 6 months post-op. To measure BLI measured using PA radiographs taken immediately and 6 months post-op. To measure implant stability with the resonance frequency analyzer (Osstell,Osstell USA) at time of implant placement, 3 months and 6 months post-op. To measure implant success rate. The implants used in this study: NobelActive 3.5 - 4.3mm diameter, 10 - 13 mm in length. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Bucco-lingual bone thickness of the alveolar ridge | To compare the bucco-lingual thickness of the alveolar ridge measured at approximately 1 mm. and 5 mm. below the crestal bone margin, using ridge mapping calipers. These values, measured pre-op, immediately, and 6 months post-op at study site are compared to those measured from controlled site. | 6 months |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| To compare BLI measured using PA radiographs | To compare BLI measured using PA radiographs taken immediately, and 6 months post-op at study site. These values are also compared to those measured from controlled site. | 6 months |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Implant Stability Quotient Values | Implant Stability Quotient Values (Osstell ISQ, Osstell USA) obtained from implants in study site, recording immediately, 3 months and 6 months post-op to evaluate implant stability. These values will also be compared to those obtained from implants placed in controlled site | 3, 6 months |
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Vinh Nguyen, DDS. | Goethe University | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Clinique Dentaire et d'implantology Dr. Vinh Nguyen | Brossard | Quebec | J4W2T4 | Canada |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D016388 | Tooth Loss |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D010510 | Periodontal Diseases |
| D009059 | Mouth Diseases |
| D009057 | Stomatognathic Diseases |
| D014076 | Tooth Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| Implants placed using drilling technique | Procedure | To measure the horizontal bone width before and after implant insertion and 6 months post-op. To measure BLI measured using PA radiographs taken immediately and 6 months post-op. To measure implant stability with the resonance frequency analyzer (Osstell,Osstell USA) at time of implant placement, 3 months and 6 months post-op. To measure implant success rate. The implants used in this study: NobelActive 3.5-4.3mm diameter, 10 - 13 mm in length. |
|