Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| International Piezosurgery Academy | OTHER |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
the goal of the study was the evaluation of the clinical and histological performance of delayed inserted implants in augmented sites with a shaped solid graft inserted in an originally narrow alveolar edentulous ridge.
Purpose To assess the efficacy of a two-stage piezo-assisted split crest technique and delayed implant insertion. Computed tomography, radiological, clinical, and histologic evaluation.
Research design Multicenter case-series
Sample size 20 patients People involved in the protocol At least 25 enrolled patients (5 per center) counting drop-outs
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Evaluation criteria
Data analysis The continuous variables will be expressed with average, median and standard deviation. Categorical variables will be expressed in numbers and percentages. There are parametrical and non parametrical statistical tests.
PREFACE
Ridge expansion (split crest or crest-splitting) is used to widen narrow ridges with adequate height for implant placement. This human case series presents radiologic, clinical and histologic results of delayed implant placement after ridge expansion and grafting of single implant sites with piezoelectric bone surgery. Bone expansion in oral surgery consists of expanding the atrophic bone crest to obtain sufficient bone width for proper dental implant placement. To achieve this result, different regenerative surgical techniques have been developed: conventional onlay/inlay grafts, interpositional sandwich osteotomies, guided bone regeneration with semipermeable membranes and alveolar distraction osteogenesis. All these procedures can be used for alveolar ridge augmentation with autologous or homologous bone grafts, xenografts, or synthetic bone substitutes to allow implant placement in one or two surgical steps. Even if the survival rate of implants inserted in expanded crests was reported to be almost 100% after 5 years of loading, several protocols have been proposed (one stage, two stage, with or without graft) together with different surgical devices (manual osteotomy, surgical burs, piezoelectric devices). One of the most critical aspects of the technique is the bone vascularization after expansion, together with the vestibular plate integrity and the long term peri-implant bone stability.
STUDY PURPOSES The primary purpose of this study is the evaluation of the effects on implant survival and prevalence of complications of a two-stage ridge expansion technique with piezoelectric dedicated tips, xenograft positioning and surgical re-entry after four months for implant placement.
MATERIALS Diagnostic and surgical instruments kit CBCT scans will be performed using last generation devices with low-dose protocol. Acteon Cube by Acteon-Satelec will be used as piezoelectric device. "Crest-splitting" tips will be used for ridge expansion, according to the manufacturer's instructions. A commercially available wedge shaped xenograft (cancellous equine collagenated bone; V-Block, Tecnoss, Italy) will be inserted between the splitted corticals as a space maintainer. A commercially available cross-linked bovine collagen membrane (Evolution, Tecnoss, Italy) will be used to cover the surgical site. 6/0 monofilament suture will be used for wound closure. After 5 months of healing, a stainless steel trephine bur mounted on an implant handpiece (4 mm external diameter, 3 mm internal diameter) will be used for implant site preparation. Bone samples harvested to prepare implant site will be stored immediately in 4% buffered formalin. A commercially available tapered implant of 3.5 mm diameter with conical connection will be positioned in the prepared site (M2, Zeros, South Korea). After 3 months of submerged healing, implants will be uncovered and restored with screwed ceramic single crowns.
EU marking All the products used in this study are marked EU and available for sale. Traceability On each package there is a label that can be attached to each patient schedule for a complete traceability of the product.
STUDY DESIGN
NUMBER OF PARTICIPANTS Sample size The minimal number of the participants of this study is 20; expecting dropouts of 1 patient per center will give a total of 25 patients. The sample must be enrolled in 24 months.
Number of Centers Five centers
Duration of the study The study can start on May 2020. The sample must be enrolled within 12 months. The follow-up time will be 3 years after loading of the implants; the total time estimated to complete the study is 5 years.
Follow-up timing Follow-up Control code Time Pre-surgical CBCT evaluation C0 Time 0 (T0) Intra-operative evaluation (stage1) C1 Time 1 (T1) Post-surgical CBCT evaluation (stage2) C2 Time 2 (T2) after 5 months from T1 Intra-operative evaluation (stage2) C3 Time 3 (T3) after 5 months from T1 Loading phase C4 Time 4 (T4) after 3 months from T3 6 months post loading C5 Time 5 (T5) 12 months post loading C6 Time 6 (T6) 24 months post loading C7 Time 7 (T7) 36 months post loading C8 Time 8 (T8)
Methods SELECTION OF PATIENTS Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Head and neck RT in the previous 5 years
Previous or actual antiresorptive therapy
Chronic corticosteroid therapy
Active periodontal disease
Pregnancy or breastfeeding
Abuse of alcohol or drugs
Incapability of understanding the purposes of the study (e.g. mental deficit)
Information for the patients The patients will be informed about the treatment, the benefits and the possible risks. The patients will be told that the clinical data collected during the pre- and post- implant surgery will be used for a clinical study and should authorize the use and processing of these data. The use of these details will strictly respect the anonymity, and will be always strictly confidential and exclusive for the purpose of the study. A copy of the informed consent form is kept by the experimenter, and another copy is for the patient.
Evaluation The data contained in the "Case Report Form" report the pre-surgery analysis and the information collected during the peri-operatory period in each enrolled patient.
Basic data
These are the collected and documented data:
Details for test group only A) Pre-operating data
• Obtaining informed consent
General data
• Remote medical history
Radiological data
• Cone beam CT in DICOM format, mandatory for the inclusion of the patient (coronal 3mm of the crest comprised between and 5mm of width).
Clinical evaluation:
B) Intra-operative data
• Systemic and local prophylaxis (antibiotics, disinfectants, anti-inflammatories, etc.). An antibiotic coverage therapy for 6 days from one hour after the procedure with Augmentin 1gr (2 tablets/day) or Clindamycin 600 mg (1 tablet/day) is mandatory.
• Anesthesia technique
• Flap design: full thickness
• Number of piezo tips used to gain the final expansion (all, all but the last, etc.)
• Implant insertion after bone harvesting
• Registration of IT and ISQ at T3
• Healing abutment positioning (if IT>30, ISQ >65)
• Intra-operative complications (for instance: cortical perforation, evident fixture mobility during the placement, neurological complications, etc.)
C) Post-operative data • Clinical evaluation These information are written in the CRF
Complications
• Type of complication
• Start, end and course
• Seriousness
Case closing • Reason of the closing
Statistic processing The demographic variables and the clinical continuous data are processed with medium and median value and with standard deviations. Categorical variables are processed with frequency charts and percentages. Data normality will be assessed by using Kolmogorov-Smirnov test and equality of variances by using Levene test. Parametric and non-parametric statistic tests for repeated measures will be used.
Adverse events and reactions The experimenter has the responsibility to report immediately all the adverse events or reactions related to the products during the study period. An adverse event or reaction is considered serious if it brings a permanent damage to the patient or if it makes a second operation necessary. All the adverse events or reactions should be communicated writhing within a short time through letters, faxes or e-mails to the appropriate authority or to the coordinator experimenter
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| narrow ridge | Experimental | width comprised between 3 and 5 mm |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alveolar Ridge Reconstruction | Procedure | wedge shaped xenograft inserted in splitted alveolar crest |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| postoperative surgical width | radiologically measured alveolar expansion | 5 months |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| new bone formation | histomorphometric analysis | 5 months later than surgery |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 28663017 | Background | Li X, Xu P, Xu X, Liu S. The application of a delayed expansion technique for horizontal alveolar ridge augmentation in dental implantation. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2017 Nov;46(11):1451-1457. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2017.05.025. Epub 2017 Jun 26. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D016301 | Alveolar Bone Loss |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001862 | Bone Resorption |
| D001847 | Bone Diseases |
| D009140 | Musculoskeletal Diseases |
| D055093 | Periodontal Atrophy |
Not provided
Not provided
case series
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| D010510 |
| Periodontal Diseases |
| D009059 | Mouth Diseases |
| D009057 | Stomatognathic Diseases |