Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The aim of the study is to describe the changes found in C1 dental implants through their early healing period.
Patients requiring a standard installation of one or two implants in the maxilla, without any need for bone augmentation, will be frequently followed for 90 days. In every meeting the implants' ISQ values (values denoting the implant stability as being measured by a dedicated, commercially available, appliance called 'Osstell').
The implants' measured ISQ values will be used to describe the changes that may be found in the implants' stability through their healing period.
At the end of the study the patients will be referred to their treating doctor for the completion of implants' restoration (i.e. crown).
10 Patients requiring standard implant installation in their maxilla will be recruited to the study.
Inclusion criteria:
Exclusion criteria:
Course of study:
Every patient found eligible to the study will need to go through a CT scan of the implantation site (as required).
Before the operation 2 gr of AMOXICILLIN (or 600mg of CLYNDAMYCIN - in case of allergy) will be administered. The implants will be installed in a standard approach under local anesthesia, as customary being done. The implants' installation torque will be recorded.
At the end of the operation the patients will be instructed to rinse their mouth with Chlorhexidine solution for one week.
Eventually the implants will be restored and loaded after the common 3 months healing period.
Follow-up appointments:
The patients will be monitored through a period of 3 months. The patients will be instructed to return to a follow-up examination 2, 4, 7, 14, 21, 28, 45, 60 and 90 days after the operation. On each meeting the implants' ISQ values will be measured using an 'Osstell' appliance.
An x-ray intra-oral radiogram will be taken right after the end of the operation and at the end of the follow-up (i.e day 90).
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| C1 Implant | Experimental | Patient having C1 implant installed. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| C1 Implant | Drug | Patients treated with dental implants. |
|
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change from baseline in implant ISQ value. | The change in implants' stability values that were measured by an 'Osstell' appliance at the end of the study as compared to their baseline value. | 90 days (at end of the follow-up). |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Implant Marginal Bone Loss (MBL). | The amount of the marginal bone loss (MBL) as measured by comparing two intra-oral radiogram taken right after the operation and at the end of the follow-up period. | 90 days (At the end of the follow-up). |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Implant survival rate. | The rate of the implants found to be integrated at the end of the study (100% is anticipated). | 90 days (At the end of the follow-up). |
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Hadas Lemberg, PhD | IRB coorinator | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hadassah Medical Organization | Jerusalem | Israel |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 15355393 | Background | Nedir R, Bischof M, Szmukler-Moncler S, Bernard JP, Samson J. Predicting osseointegration by means of implant primary stability. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2004 Oct;15(5):520-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2004.01059.x. | |
| 15248877 | Background | Glauser R, Sennerby L, Meredith N, Ree A, Lundgren A, Gottlow J, Hammerle CH. Resonance frequency analysis of implants subjected to immediate or early functional occlusal loading. Successful vs. failing implants. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2004 Aug;15(4):428-34. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2004.01036.x. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D007576 | Jaw, Edentulous, Partially |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D007575 | Jaw, Edentulous |
| D007571 | Jaw Diseases |
| D009140 | Musculoskeletal Diseases |
| D009057 | Stomatognathic Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
open label
Not provided
| 16958688 | Background | Turkyilmaz I, Sennerby L, Tumer C, Yenigul M, Avci M. Stability and marginal bone level measurements of unsplinted implants used for mandibular overdentures: a 1-year randomized prospective clinical study comparing early and conventional loading protocols. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2006 Oct;17(5):501-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2006.01261.x. |
| 16968381 | Background | Hobkirk JA, Wiskott HW; Working Group 1. Biomechanical aspects of oral implants. Consensus report of Working Group 1. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2006 Oct;17 Suppl 2:52-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2006.01358.x. |
| 16968377 | Background | Aparicio C, Lang NP, Rangert B. Validity and clinical significance of biomechanical testing of implant/bone interface. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2006 Oct;17 Suppl 2:2-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2006.01365.x. |
| D009066 |
| Mouth, Edentulous |
| D009059 | Mouth Diseases |
| D014076 | Tooth Diseases |