Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Lack of funding
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Wyss Institute at Harvard University | OTHER |
| Center for Integration of Medicine & Innovative Technology | OTHER |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The overall objective of the study is to test whether the use of small electrical currents to stimulate proprioceptors of the upper limb has potential for improving robot-assisted upper-limb rehabilitation in stroke survivors.
Study participants will be instructed to perform upper-limb movements using a system designed for upper-limb rehabilitation (Armeo Spring by Hocoma AG). The system provides subjects with unloading of the stroke-affected arm thus facilitating the performance of upper-limb movements. The system will be used to track the movements of the stroke-affected arm. Simultaneously, a custom-designed system (a prototype developed by the investigators) will be used to deliver small electrical currents to the arm. We hypothesize that the currents delivered to the arm will improve the accuracy of the movements performed by study participants.
To assess if delivering small currents to the arm has an effect on the accuracy of the movements performed by the study participants, they will receive actual stimulation for some trials and sham stimulation for other trials. Because the investigators will deliver very small currents, study participants will be unable to perceive such currents and hence tell if they are performing the movements while receiving actual or sham stimulation. By comparing trials performed while subjects receive actual stimulation with trials performed while subjects received sham stimulation, the investigators will determine if the stimulation has an effect on the accuracy of the movements performed by the subjects.
It is worth noticing that the investigators collected primary outcome data to assess changes associated with the use of actual stimulation vs sham stimulation. Data during a follow-up session was also collected, but not for the purpose of collecting outcome measures.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Current stimulator | Other | The investigators have developed a device to deliver very small currents to the arm. The device will be used while subjects perform upper-limb movements using a device for upper-limb rehabilitation. Subjects will perform multiple trials of movement. During half of the trials, they will receive actual stimulation. During the other half, they will receive sham stimulation. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current stimulator | Device | This is a device developed by the investigators to produce sub-sensory electrical stimulation delivered via subcutaneous electrodes placed on the skin. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Fugl-Meyer Assessment | Subjects are asked to perform upper-limb movements from which a therapist can assess the severity of movement abnormalities (e.g. flexion synergies) | Changes in Fugl-Meyer Assessment score with vs without stimulation |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Jebsen-Taylor Hand Function Test | Subjects are asked to perform a set of functional movements from which a therapist can assess subjects' functional limitations | Changes in Jebsen-Taylor Hand Function Test score with vs without stimulation |
| Motor Activity Log |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Paolo Bonato, PhD | Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital Boston | Boston | Massachusetts | 02129 | United States |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D020521 | Stroke |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D002561 | Cerebrovascular Disorders |
| D001927 | Brain Diseases |
| D002493 | Central Nervous System Diseases |
| D009422 | Nervous System Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
The investigators will use a system to inject small currents in the arm while subjects perform upper-limb movements. Subjects will perform multiple trials. During half of the trials, subjects will receive actual stimulation. During the other half, subjects will receive sham stimulation.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Subjects are asked about the amount and quality of use of their stroke-affected arm during the performance of daily activities |
| Change in Motor Activity Log score with vs without stimulation |
| Modified Ashworth Scale | A therapist examines subjects to assess the severity of spasticity | Change in Modified Ashworth Scale score with vs without stimulation |
| Box and Block test | Subjects are asked to move as many small wooden blocks as possible from one to box to another in a set amount of time | Change in Box and Block test score with vs without stimulation |
| Grip strength | A hand dynamometer is used to measure grip strength | Change in grip strength with vs without stimulation |
| D014652 | Vascular Diseases |
| D002318 | Cardiovascular Diseases |