Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Abbott Medical Devices | INDUSTRY |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The registry aims to evaluate the safety, performance and efficacy of the Everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffold (BVS) system in patients with de novo native coronary artery lesions in all-day clinical practice.
Bioresorbable scaffolds are transient implants. They act like drug-eluting metallic stents (DES) during the first 3 months by supporting the vessel wall thereby keeping the artery patent. Subsequently, resorption of the scaffold begins and its structure loosens. As a result of everolimus release, neointimal growth is inhibited similar to DES. Finally the implant is reabsorbed completely in about 2-3 years. BVS in terms of late stent thrombosis may be safer than DES. Transiently scaffolded vessels may regain their natural curvature and angulation as well as response to nitroglycerine and endothelial function.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| (This trial has no primary outcome, all outcomes are of equal weight), Major Adverse Cardiac Event (MACE) | Composite of ischemia driven target lesion revascularisation (TLR), myocardial infarction and cardiac death | at 24 months |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Acute procedural success | Achievement of final in-scaffold residual stenosis of < 50% and TIMI flow 3 of the target site. Successful delivery and deployment of at least one study scaffold at the intended target lesion and successful withdrawal of the delivery system for all target lesions without occurrence of cardiac death, target vessel MI or repeat TLR during hospital stay (maximum of 7 days). In dual target lesion setting both lesions must meet clinical procedure success criteria. |
Not provided
The recommendation to implant BVS in an individual patient is purely based on clinical grounds. These are determined by the instructions for use (IFU) of the BVS and by the clinical experience accumulated so far from clinical studies.These studies suggest that the BVS should be implanted under certain conditions, which are determined by the patient and the coronary lesion treated:
Eligible:
Regarding to patient
Regarding to lesion
Not eligible:
Regarding to patient
Regarding to lesion
Not provided
Not provided
Patients with cardiovascular disease
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Detlef G Mathey, MD | Medical Care Center Prof. Mathey, Prof. Schofer GmbH | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Medical Care Center Prof. Mathey, Prof. Schofer GmbH | Hamburg | Free and Hanseatic City of Hamburg | 22527 | Germany | ||
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 21958884 | Background | Serruys PW, Onuma Y, Dudek D, Smits PC, Koolen J, Chevalier B, de Bruyne B, Thuesen L, McClean D, van Geuns RJ, Windecker S, Whitbourn R, Meredith I, Dorange C, Veldhof S, Hebert KM, Sudhir K, Garcia-Garcia HM, Ormiston JA. Evaluation of the second generation of a bioresorbable everolimus-eluting vascular scaffold for the treatment of de novo coronary artery stenosis: 12-month clinical and imaging outcomes. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011 Oct 4;58(15):1578-88. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.05.050. | |
| 21959320 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| At the end of hospital stay (maximum of 7 days) |
| Acute device success | Successful delivery and deployment of the first scaffold at the intended target lesion (in overlapping setting both planned scaffolds) and successful withdrawal of delivery system. Attainment of < 50 % residual stenosis and TIMI flow 3 of the target site, using the BVS without the need for other non- study stents. | At time of intervention |
| Scaffold thrombosis | At time of intervention, and at 6, 12, 24, 36 months |
| Cardiac death | At time of intervention, and at 6, 12,24, 36 months |
| Myocardial infarction | At time of intervention, and at 6, 12, 24 36 months |
| Ischemia driven target lesion revascularisation (TLR) | Target lesion denominates scaffolded segment and 5 mm beyond. | At time of intervention, and at 6, 12, 24, 36 months |
| Major Adverse Cardiac Event (MACE) | Composite of ischemia driven target lesion revascularisation (TLR), myocardial infarction and cardial death | At time of intervention, participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay (an expected average of 3 days), at 6, 12, 36 months |
| Ischemia driven target vessel revascularisation (TVR) | TVR is ischemia driven. | at 6, 12, 24, 36 months |
| Ischemia driven target vessel failure (TVF) | at 6, 12, 24, 36 month |
| In-lesion % diameter stenosis | Prior procedure |
| In-scaffold % diameter stenosis | At time of intervention and at angiographic FU if applicable |
| Minimal lumen diameter (MLD) | Prior and post procedure and at FU if applicable |
| In-scaffold late lumen loss (LLL) | At angiographic follow-up if applicable |
| Proximal and distal late lumen loss (LLL) | At angiographic follow-up if applicable |
| In-lesion late lumen loss | At angiographic follow-up if applicable |
| Response to nitroglycerin | Before scaffold implantation, during angiographic follow-up if applicable |
| In-lesion angiographic binary restenosis (≥ 50%) | At angiographic follow-up if applicable |
| Curvature (cm-1) | treated region | Prior and post procedure and at angiographic follow-up if applicable |
| Angulation (°) | Treated region | Prior and post procedure and at angiographic follow-up if applicable |
| Clinical success | Procedural success and freedom from TVF, TVR, CABG and scaffold thrombosis | At time of intervention, and at 6, 12, 24, 36 months |
| Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) | at 6, 12, 24, 36 month |
| Herzzentrum Brandenburg in Bernau |
| Bernau |
| 16321 |
| Germany |
| Klinikum Coburg GmbH | Coburg | 96450 | Germany |
| Elisabeth-Krankenhaus Essen GmbH | Essen | 45138 | Germany |
| Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein | Kiel | 24105 | Germany |
| Universitätsklinikum Ulm | Ulm | 89081 | Germany |
| Background |
| Dudek D, Onuma Y, Ormiston JA, Thuesen L, Miquel-Hebert K, Serruys PW. Four-year clinical follow-up of the ABSORB everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffold in patients with de novo coronary artery disease: the ABSORB trial. EuroIntervention. 2012 Jan;7(9):1060-1. doi: 10.4244/EIJV7I9A168. |
| 21737016 | Background | Diletti R, Onuma Y, Farooq V, Gomez-Lara J, Brugaletta S, van Geuns RJ, Regar E, de Bruyne B, Dudek D, Thuesen L, Chevalier B, McClean D, Windecker S, Whitbourn R, Smits P, Koolen J, Meredith I, Li D, Veldhof S, Rapoza R, Garcia-Garcia HM, Ormiston JA, Serruys PW. 6-month clinical outcomes following implantation of the bioresorbable everolimus-eluting vascular scaffold in vessels smaller or larger than 2.5 mm. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011 Jul 12;58(3):258-64. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.02.052. |
| 21777888 | Background | Gomez-Lara J, Brugaletta S, Farooq V, van Geuns RJ, De Bruyne B, Windecker S, McClean D, Thuesen L, Dudek D, Koolen J, Whitbourn R, Smits PC, Chevalier B, Morel MA, Dorange C, Veldhof S, Rapoza R, Garcia-Garcia HM, Ormiston JA, Serruys PW. Angiographic geometric changes of the lumen arterial wall after bioresorbable vascular scaffolds and metallic platform stents at 1-year follow-up. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2011 Jul;4(7):789-99. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2011.04.009. |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D002318 | Cardiovascular Diseases |
| D003324 | Coronary Artery Disease |
| D017202 | Myocardial Ischemia |
| D003327 | Coronary Disease |
| D023903 | Coronary Restenosis |
| D006331 | Heart Diseases |
| D023921 | Coronary Stenosis |
| D001161 | Arteriosclerosis |
| D001157 | Arterial Occlusive Diseases |
| D014652 | Vascular Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided