Articaine Versus Lidocaine Supplemental Infiltration Efficacy in Irreversible Pulpitis Mandibular Molars After Failed Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block
Articaine Versus Lidocaine Supplemental Infiltration Efficacy in Irreversible Pulpitis Mandibular Molars After Failed Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block
The purpose of this trial is to study the ability of a frequently used dental anesthetic (articaine) to achieve complete numbness of a diseased tooth with the most commonly used injection technique in the lower jaw (inferior alveolar nerve block: IANB). If this technique fails, a commonly used supplemental (SUP) technique with one of two possible dental anesthetics (lidocaine or articaine) will be given to evaluate the success/failure of complete numbness between the two anesthetics.
Standardized administration of anesthesia is provided by controlled delivery using Midwest Comfort Control Syringe.
The investigators hypothesize that supplemental infiltration anesthesia with articaine will give the same success rate as lidocaine in achieving complete pulpal anesthesia in mandibular molars with irreversible pulpits.
This study consisted of two periods of patient enrollment, treatment and data collection: Part I: 101 subjects; Part II: 100 subjects.
The goal of the study is to achieve complete pulpal anesthesia in irreversible pulpitis mandibular molars, either by IANB administration of 4% articaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine (NDA 022466), or in case the IANB appeared to be clinically unsuccessful by supplemental infiltration of either articaine or lidocaine.
The proposed randomized controlled trial (RCT) aims to answer the following questions:
This study will combine the data from HUM00049692- Articaine Efficacy in Inflamed Molars to create a larger sample size, giving a total sample size of approximately 200 patients.
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria: