Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Abbott Diabetes Care | INDUSTRY |
| DexCom, Inc. | INDUSTRY |
| Insulet Corporation | INDUSTRY |
| University of California, Santa Barbara |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
In this protocol the investigators plan to demonstrate management of glucose using a modular insulin management system based on continuous glucose monitoring and targeted towards the avoidance of hypoglycemic and prolonged hyperglycemic episodes (i.e. control to range). The protocol is designed to challenge the insulin management system with meals and mild exercise, so as to demonstrate its capacity to avoid large glucose excursion with changing metabolic state. This system is designed to both
The investigators plan to enroll 12 adolescent T1DM patients (expected retention 10/12) and compare glucose control performances under two treatments: standard vs. the new insulin management system. The protocol will include a total of 5 admissions per subject (3 out-patients and 2 in-patients): screening, CGM insertion 1, CGM insertion 2, inpatient 1 and inpatient 2. During the 24h inpatient admissions the patients will be challenged with 30 minutes of mild exercise and 3 meals, insulin coverage of these events will vary depending on the chosen treatment, each subject will be exposed to both studied treatments (repeated measure design). The order of treatment during the inpatient admissions will be randomized.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Closed Loop Control (CLC) | Experimental | The CLC used a computer to make recommendations for their insulin treatment. This study arm was designed to demonstrate management of glucose using a modular insulin management system based on continuous glucose monitoring and targeted towards the avoidance of hypoglycemic and prolonged hyperglycemic episodes (i.e. control to range). This system was designed to both:
|
|
| Open Loop | Placebo Comparator | The subject were in charge of their insulin treatment. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Open-Loop | Device | This admission was to assess the subjects' level of glucose control and created a base to compare the performance of the closed-loop system. Subjects monitored their own blood glucose values and administer their basal/bolus as they would at home. Otherwise, the admission remained the same as in the closed-loop admission (i.e. meals, exercise, etc...). |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Hypoglycemic Events | Number of hypoglycemic events below 70 mg/dL per patient per day Hypoglycemic event is defined as consecutive YSI plasma glucose measurements below 70 or moderate hypoglycemic symptoms | 22 hours |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Percent Time in Euglycemia | Percent of time the patient plasma glucose as measured by YSI is between 70mg/dl and 180mg/dl | 22 hours |
| Mean Glucose | Average plasma glucose concentration in mg/dl |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Marc D. Breton, Ph.D. | University of Virginia, Center for Diabetes Technology | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| University of Virginia Health System | Charlottesville | Virginia | 22908 | United States |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 22688340 | Result | Breton M, Farret A, Bruttomesso D, Anderson S, Magni L, Patek S, Dalla Man C, Place J, Demartini S, Del Favero S, Toffanin C, Hughes-Karvetski C, Dassau E, Zisser H, Doyle FJ 3rd, De Nicolao G, Avogaro A, Cobelli C, Renard E, Kovatchev B; International Artificial Pancreas Study Group. Fully integrated artificial pancreas in type 1 diabetes: modular closed-loop glucose control maintains near normoglycemia. Diabetes. 2012 Sep;61(9):2230-7. doi: 10.2337/db11-1445. Epub 2012 Jun 11. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Open-Loop First, Then Closed-Loop | Open-Loop first, then Closed-Loop control (CLC) Experimental, CLC admission: The CLC used a computer to make recommendations for their insulin treatment. This system was designed to both:
Placebo Comparator: Open Loop admission. The subjects were in charge of their insulin treatment. |
| FG001 | Closed-Loop Control First, Then Open-Loop | Closed-Loop control (CLC) first, then Open-Loop Experimental, CLC admission: The CLC used a computer to make recommendations for their insulin treatment. This system was designed to both:
Placebo Comparator: Open Loop admission. The subjects were in charge of their insulin treatment. |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Adolescents | Adolescents participated in both the Standard Control to Range (sCTR) Closed-Loop Control (CLC) Admission and the Open-Loop admission. Experimental: The CLC used a computer to make recommendations for their insulin treatment. This system was designed to both:
Placebo Comparator: Open Loop. The subjects were in charge of their insulin treatment. |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | Mean |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Hypoglycemic Events | Number of hypoglycemic events below 70 mg/dL per patient per day Hypoglycemic event is defined as consecutive YSI plasma glucose measurements below 70 or moderate hypoglycemic symptoms | Posted | Mean | Standard Error | events/patient | 22 hours |
|
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Adolescents | Adolescents participated in both the Standard Control to Range (sCTR) Closed-Loop Control (CLC) Admission and the Open-Loop admission. Experimental: The CLC used a computer to make recommendations for their insulin treatment. This system was designed to both:
Placebo Comparator: Open Loop. The subjects were in charge of their insulin treatment. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marc Breton, Ph.D. | University of Virginia | 434-982-6484 | mb6nt@virginia.edu |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D003922 | Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1 |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D003920 | Diabetes Mellitus |
| D044882 | Glucose Metabolism Disorders |
| D008659 | Metabolic Diseases |
| D009750 | Nutritional and Metabolic Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
| OTHER |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| Closed-Loop | Device | In this study, the researchers compared the management of diabetes during physical activity and meals with the closed-loop system developed at the University of Virginia. This system uses two DexComTM Seven Continuous Glucose Monitor, a computer containing an investigational control algorithm (well-defined instructions that are expressed in mathematical equations), and an OmniPod Insulin Management System, a portable subcutaneous (under the skin) insulin pump. During the closed-loop admission, the computer based algorithm used CGM values to make recommendations of insulin treatment. The study included a challenge to the insulin management system with meals and mild exercise, so as to demonstrate its capacity to avoid large glucose excursion with changing metabolic state. |
|
| 22 hours |
| years |
|
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| HbA1c | Glycated hemoglobin | Mean | Standard Deviation | percent |
|
| OG001 | Open-Loop | The subjects were in charge of their insulin treatment. Open-Loop: This admission was to assess the subjects' level of glucose control and created a base to compare the performance of the closed-loop system. Subjects monitored their own blood glucose values and administer their basal/bolus as they would at home. Otherwise, the admission remained the same as in the closed-loop admission (i.e. meals, exercise, etc...). |
|
|
| Secondary | Percent Time in Euglycemia | Percent of time the patient plasma glucose as measured by YSI is between 70mg/dl and 180mg/dl | Posted | Mean | Standard Error | percentage of time in range | 22 hours |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Mean Glucose | Average plasma glucose concentration in mg/dl | Posted | Mean | Standard Error | mg/dL | 22 hours |
|
|
|
| 0 |
| 11 |
| 0 |
| 11 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| D004700 | Endocrine System Diseases |
| D001327 | Autoimmune Diseases |
| D007154 | Immune System Diseases |
| Night (t=7h) |
|
| Night (t=7) |
|