Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Abbott Diabetes Care | INDUSTRY |
| Insulet Corporation | INDUSTRY |
| DexCom, Inc. | INDUSTRY |
| University of California, Santa Barbara |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
In this protocol the investigators plan to demonstrate the feasibility of a modular insulin management system based on continuous glucose monitoring and targeted towards the avoidance of hypoglycemic and prolonged hyperglycemic episodes (i.e. control to range). The protocol is designed to challenge the insulin management system with meals and mild exercise, so as to demonstrate its capacity to avoid large glucose excursion with changing metabolic state. This system is designed to both
The investigators plan to enroll 12 adult Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus (T1DM) patients (expected retention 10/12) and compare glucose control performances under two treatments: standard vs. the new insulin management system. The protocol will include a total of 6 admissions per subject (4 out-patients and 2 in-patients): screening, effort test, CGM insertion 1, inpatient 1, CGM insertion 2, and inpatient 2. During the 24h inpatient admissions, the patients will be challenged with 30 minutes of mild exercise and 3 meals, insulin coverage of these events will vary depending on the chosen treatment, each subject will be exposed to both studied treatments (repeated measure design).The order of treatment during the inpatient admissions will be randomized.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Closed Loop Control (CLC) | Experimental | The CLC used a computer to make recommendations for their insulin treatment. This study arm was designed to demonstrate management of glucose using a modular insulin management system based on continuous glucose monitoring and targeted towards the avoidance of hypoglycemic and prolonged hyperglycemic episodes (i.e. control to range). This system was designed to both:
|
|
| Open Loop | Placebo Comparator | The subject were in charge of their insulin treatment. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Closed Loop Control (CLC) | Device | In this study, the researchers compared the management of diabetes during physical activity and meals with the closed-loop system developed at the University of Virginia. This Control to Range System uses two DexCom Seven Continuous Glucose Monitor, a computer containing an investigational control algorithm (well-defined instructions that are expressed in mathematical equations), and an OmniPod Insulin Management System, a portable subcutaneous (under the skin) insulin pump. During the closed-loop admission, the computer used CGM values to make recommendations of insulin treatment based on the algorithms. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Hypoglycemic Events | Number of hypoglycemic events below 70 mg/dL per patient per day | Throughout each 22-hour closed-loop and open-loop admission for sCTR and eCTR |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Percent Time Spent in Near Normoglycemia | Comparison of time spent in near normoglycemia (3.9 to 10 mmol/mL) in open-loop vs closed-loop sCTR and eCTR. | Throughout each 22-hour closed-loop and open-loop admission for sCTR and eCTR |
| Mean Glucose |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Marc D Breton, Ph.D. | University of Virgnia - School of Medicine, Psychiatry and Neurobehavioral Sciences | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| University of Virginia Health System | Charlottesville | Virginia | 22904 | United States |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 22688340 | Result | Breton M, Farret A, Bruttomesso D, Anderson S, Magni L, Patek S, Dalla Man C, Place J, Demartini S, Del Favero S, Toffanin C, Hughes-Karvetski C, Dassau E, Zisser H, Doyle FJ 3rd, De Nicolao G, Avogaro A, Cobelli C, Renard E, Kovatchev B; International Artificial Pancreas Study Group. Fully integrated artificial pancreas in type 1 diabetes: modular closed-loop glucose control maintains near normoglycemia. Diabetes. 2012 Sep;61(9):2230-7. doi: 10.2337/db11-1445. Epub 2012 Jun 11. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Open-Loop First, Then sCTR Closed-Loop | Completed open-loop, then sCTR (Standard Control to Range ) Closed-Loop admission. The two modules of sCTR are the SSM (safety supervision module) and a standard range control module that avoids prolonged hyperglycemic excursions. Both modules use a real-time estimate of the patient 's metabolic state based on CGM (continuous glucose monitor) and insulin infusion data. This estimate is used for prediction of the risks of hypo-and hyperglycemia 30-45 min ahead of the event. If a risk for hypoglycemia is predicted, the SSM attenuates automatically any insulin requests proportionally to the predicted risk level. How aggressively the system attenuates insulin is determined with patient characteristics (e.g. body weight, insulin-to-carbohydrate ratio, and basal insulin delivery). If a risk for hyperglycemia is predicted, the range controller gives a correction bolus using the predicted plasma glucose and the patient's CSII (continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion) parameters. |
| FG001 | sCTR Closed-Loop First, Then Open-Loop | Participants completed sCTR Closed-Loop admission, then completed open-loop admission. The two modules of sCTR are the SSM and a standard range control module that avoids prolonged hyperglycemic excursions. Both modules use a real-time estimate of the patient 's metabolic state based on CGM and insulin infusion data. This estimate is used for prediction of the risks of hypo-and hyperglycemia 30-45 min ahead of the event. If a risk for hypoglycemia is predicted, the SSM attenuates automatically any insulin requests proportionally to the predicted risk level. How aggressively the system attenuates insulin is determined with patient characteristics (e.g., body weight, insulin-to-carbohydrate ratio, and basal insulin delivery). If a risk for hyperglycemia is predicted, the range controller gives a correction bolus using the predicted plasma glucose and the patient's CSII parameters; the system injects only half of the computed bolus and can do so once every hour. |
| FG002 | Open-Loop First, Then eCTR Closed-Loop | Participants completed open-loop admission, then completed eCTR (Enhanced Control to Range) closed-loop admission. The two modules of the eCTR are the SSM and an enhanced range control module based on an MPC (model predictive control) algorithm that aims to maintain glycemia in a target range. eCTR also uses insulin-on-board constraints (29) intended to prevent insulin overdose during intensified therapy. The rationale behind MPC was presented in detail in a recent review (7). Controller aggressiveness was individualized for each subject based on readily available patient characteristics (e.g., body weight, insulin-to-carbohydrate ratio, and basal insulin delivery) (30). In this application, the MPC worked using information from the individual's conventional therapy. Premeal boluses were triggered by the patient, with the carbohydrate amount measured in the clinical research center (CRC) kitchen but automatically calculated by eCTR. |
| FG003 | eCTR Closed-Loop First, Then Open-Loop | Participants completed open-loop admission, then completed eCTR closed-loop admission. The two modules of the eCTR are the SSM and an enhanced range control module based on an MPC algorithm that aims to maintain glycemia in a target range. eCTR also uses insulin-on-board constraints (29) intended to prevent insulin overdose during intensified therapy. The rationale behind MPC was presented in detail in a recent review (7). Controller aggressiveness was individualized for each subject based on readily available patient characteristics (e.g., body weight, insulin-to-carbohydrate ratio, and basal insulin delivery) (30). In this application, the MPC worked using information from the individual's conventional therapy. Premeal boluses were triggered by the patient, with the carbohydrate amount measured in the CRC kitchen but automatically calculated by eCTR. |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Standard Control to Range (sCTR) | The two modules of sCTR are the SSM and a standard range control module that avoids prolonged hyperglycemic excursions. Both modules use a real-time estimate of the patient 's metabolic state based on CGM and insulin infusion data. This estimate is used for prediction of the risks of hypo-and hyperglycemia 30-45 min ahead of the event. If a risk for hypoglycemia is predicted, the SSM attenuates automatically any insulin requests proportionally to the predicted risk level. How aggressively the system attenuates insulin is determined with patient characteristics (e.g., body weight, insulin-to-carbohydrate ratio, and basal insulin delivery). If a risk for hyperglycemia is predicted, the range controller gives a correction bolus using the predicted plasma glucose and the patient's CSII parameters; the system injects only half of the computed bolus and can do so once every hour. |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Categorical | Count of Participants |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Hypoglycemic Events | Number of hypoglycemic events below 70 mg/dL per patient per day | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | events/admission per patient | Throughout each 22-hour closed-loop and open-loop admission for sCTR and eCTR |
|
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Open-Loop | This admission was to assess the subjects' level of glucose control and created a base to compare the performance of the closed-loop system. Subjects monitored their own blood glucose values and administer their basal/bolus as they would at home. Subjects use their own pump. Otherwise, the admission remained the same as in the closed-loop admission (i.e. meals, exercise, etc...). |
Not provided
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hyperglycemia | Endocrine disorders |
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marc D Breton, Ph.D. | University of Virginia | 434-982-6484 | mb6nt@virginia.edu |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D003922 | Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1 |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D003920 | Diabetes Mellitus |
| D044882 | Glucose Metabolism Disorders |
| D008659 | Metabolic Diseases |
| D009750 | Nutritional and Metabolic Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
| OTHER |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| Open Loop | Device | This admission was to assess the subjects' level of glucose control and created a base to compare the performance of the closed-loop system. Subjects monitored their own blood glucose values and administer their basal/bolus as they would at home. Subjects use their own pump. Otherwise, the admission remained the same as in the closed-loop admission (i.e. meals, exercise, etc...). |
|
Average plasma glucose concentration in mg/dl
| Throughout each 22-hour closed-loop and open-loop admission for sCTR and eCTR |
| BG001 | Enhanced Control to Range (eCTR) | The two modules of the eCTR are the SSM and an enhanced range control module based on an MPC algorithm that aims to maintain glycemia in a target range. eCTR also uses insulin-on-board constraints (29) intended to prevent insulin overdose during intensified therapy. The rationale behind MPC was presented in detail in a recent review (7). Controller aggressiveness was individualized for each subject based on readily available patient characteristics (e.g., body weight, insulin-to-carbohydrate ratio, and basal insulin delivery) (30). In this application, the MPC worked using information from the individual's conventional therapy. Premeal boluses were triggered by the patient, with the carbohydrate amount measured in the CRC kitchen but automatically calculated by eCTR. |
| BG002 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| Participants |
|
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
The CLC used a computer to make recommendations for their insulin treatment. This study arm was designed to demonstrate management of glucose using a modular insulin management system based on continuous glucose monitoring and targeted towards the avoidance of hypoglycemic and prolonged hyperglycemic episodes (i.e. control to range). This system was designed to both:
Closed Loop Control (CLC): During the closed-loop admission, the computer used CGM values to make recommendations of insulin treatment based on the algorithms.
|
|
| Secondary | Percent Time Spent in Near Normoglycemia | Comparison of time spent in near normoglycemia (3.9 to 10 mmol/mL) in open-loop vs closed-loop sCTR and eCTR. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | percentage of time | Throughout each 22-hour closed-loop and open-loop admission for sCTR and eCTR |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Mean Glucose | Average plasma glucose concentration in mg/dl | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | mg/dL | Throughout each 22-hour closed-loop and open-loop admission for sCTR and eCTR |
|
|
|
| 0 |
| 38 |
| 2 |
| 38 |
| EG001 | sCTR Closed-Loop Control | The two modules of sCTR are the SSM and a standard range control module that avoids prolonged hyperglycemic excursions. Both modules use a real-time estimate of the patient 's metabolic state based on CGM and insulin infusion data. This estimate is used for prediction of the risks of hypo-and hyperglycemia 30-45 min ahead of the event. If a risk for hypoglycemia is predicted, the SSM attenuates automatically any insulin requests proportionally to the predicted risk level. How aggressively the system attenuates insulin is determined with patient characteristics (e.g., body weight, insulin-to-carbohydrate ratio, and basal insulin delivery). If a risk for hyperglycemia is predicted, the range controller gives a correction bolus using the predicted plasma glucose and the patient's CSII parameters; the system injects only half of the computed bolus and can do so once every hour. | 0 | 26 | 2 | 26 |
| EG002 | eCTR Closed-Loop Control | The two modules of the eCTR are the SSM and an enhanced range control module based on an MPC algorithm that aims to maintain glycemia in a target range. eCTR also uses insulin-on-board constraints (29) intended to prevent insulin overdose during intensified therapy. The rationale behind MPC was presented in detail in a recent review (7). Controller aggressiveness was individualized for each subject based on readily available patient characteristics (e.g., body weight, insulin-to-carbohydrate ratio, and basal insulin delivery) (30). In this application, the MPC worked using information from the individual's conventional therapy. Premeal boluses were triggered by the patient, with the carbohydrate amount measured in the CRC kitchen but automatically calculated by eCTR. | 0 | 12 | 0 | 12 |
| Ecchymosis | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders |
|
| Vasovagal Episode | Nervous system disorders |
|
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| D004700 | Endocrine System Diseases |
| D001327 | Autoimmune Diseases |
| D007154 | Immune System Diseases |