Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The Sponsor values the progression of hearing healthcare practice and acknowledges a need for re-evaluation of indications for determining adult cochlear implant candidacy. This need arises from current research, peer reviewed literature, and technological advancement with concomitant performance outcomes. To address this specifically, the Sponsor proposes to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the Cochlear™ Nucleus® implant system with a revised indication.
Existing research, as discussed, supports the opinion that current candidacy criteria are set conservatively. The Sponsor, in addition to the support of recent peer reviewed literature illustrating a need for an appropriate criteria and more suitable speech recognition measure, believe it is appropriate at this time to re-evaluate the candidacy requirements associated with adult cochlear implantation. Specifically, this will be accomplished by evaluating the safety and efficacy of the Cochlear™ Nucleus® cochlear implant system under revised cochlear implant indications. The proposed approach would be to evaluate individuals scoring between 10 - 40% inclusively on Consonant Nucleus Consonant (CNC) monosyllabic words who do not meet current approved speech perception criteria with the widely used sentence measure Hearing In Noise Test (HINT) in quiet. No change to current qualifying audiometric criteria (bilateral moderate to profound sensorineural hearing loss in the low frequencies and profound hearing loss in the mid to high speech frequencies) for implant candidacy is proposed.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| cochlear implant | Other |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| cochlear implant | Device | Cochlear implant surgery |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| CNC Monosyllabic Word Score - Treated Ear | The primary study endpoint was to test whether a statistically significant difference could be obtained between the mean, preoperative Consonant Nucleus Consonant (CNC) monosyllabic word score in the ear to be implanted compared to the postoperative CNC word score in the cochlear implant alone condition at 6 months postimplant activation for candidates who currently perform outside the approved Nucleus® cochlear implant candidacy requirements. CNC Word Test is a validated test of open-set word recognition. The test consists of 10 lists with 50 monosyllabic words in each list. Subject responses are scored for both words and phonemes correct in the correct sequence. Subjects will be tested using a configuration of speech at 0º azimuth in quiet. | Six months |
Not provided
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Colin Driscoll, MD | Mayo Clinic | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mayo Clinic | Rochester | Minnesota | 55905 | United States |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Implanted | Subjects who met study inclusion and completed the primary endpoint of 6 months postimplant activation |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
Subjects who met study inclusion and completed the primary endpoint of 6 months postimplant activation.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Implanted | Subjects who met study inclusion and completed the primary endpoint of 6 months postimplant activation |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | Mean |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | CNC Monosyllabic Word Score - Treated Ear | The primary study endpoint was to test whether a statistically significant difference could be obtained between the mean, preoperative Consonant Nucleus Consonant (CNC) monosyllabic word score in the ear to be implanted compared to the postoperative CNC word score in the cochlear implant alone condition at 6 months postimplant activation for candidates who currently perform outside the approved Nucleus® cochlear implant candidacy requirements. CNC Word Test is a validated test of open-set word recognition. The test consists of 10 lists with 50 monosyllabic words in each list. Subject responses are scored for both words and phonemes correct in the correct sequence. Subjects will be tested using a configuration of speech at 0º azimuth in quiet. | Posted | Mean | Full Range | percent correct | Six months |
|
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Implanted | Subjects who met study inclusion and completed the primary endpoint of 6 months postimplant activation |
Not provided
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Postoperative Pain | Ear and labyrinth disorders | Postoperatively subject complained of local pain with reported questionable temperature. Antibiotics were prescribed as a precaution. One week following antibiotic course, no abnormalities were noted or reported. |
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dr. Colin Driscoll | Mayo Clinic, Rochester | 507 266 1965 | driscoll.colin@mayo.edu |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D034381 | Hearing Loss |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D006311 | Hearing Disorders |
| D004427 | Ear Diseases |
| D010038 | Otorhinolaryngologic Diseases |
| D012678 | Sensation Disorders |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D003054 | Cochlear Implants |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D058117 | Neural Prostheses |
| D058542 | Implantable Neurostimulators |
| D004567 | Electrodes, Implanted |
| D004566 | Electrodes |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| years |
|
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Preoperative CNC word score - Treated Ear | Consonant Nucleus Consonant (CNC) Monosyllabic Word Test (Peterson & Lehiste, 1962). CNC Word Test is a validated test of open-set word recognition. The test consists of 10 lists with 50 monosyllabic words in each list. Subject responses are scored for words correct in the correct sequence. Subjects will be tested using a configuration of speech at 0º azimuth in quiet. | Mean | Full Range | percent correct |
|
| Preoperative HINT Quiet score - Treated Ear | The Hearing in Noise Test (HINT) (Nilsson et al. 1994). The HINT sentences are recorded and consist of 25 equivalent lists. Each test list contains 10 sentences that vary from 3 to 7 words in length. Subjects will be tested in quiet using a configuration of speech at 0º azimuth in quiet. | Mean | Full Range | percent correct |
|
| Preoperative AzBio Sentence Noise score - Treated Ear | AzBio Sentence Test (Spahr & Dorman, 2005). The AzBio Test is a validated test that consists of 15 lists of 20 sentences each. Each list includes 5 sentences from each of 4 different male and female speakers. Each word in the sentence counts towards the overall score. Subjects will be tested using a configuration of speech and noise at 0º azimuth. | Mean | Full Range | percent correct |
|
|
|
| 0 |
| 21 |
| 2 |
| 21 |
|
| Decrement in CNC word score performance postimplantation | Ear and labyrinth disorders | Sentence testing: 37% pre-op, 36% 3 months, 53% 6 months. Subject stated memory affects performance. Integrity test results within normal limits (WNL) for receiver/stimulator and electrode array. Programming resolved sound quality. |
|
Not provided
Not provided
| D009461 |
| Neurologic Manifestations |
| D009422 | Nervous System Diseases |
| D012816 | Signs and Symptoms |
| D013568 | Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |
| D055615 |
| Electrical Equipment and Supplies |
| D004864 | Equipment and Supplies |
| D019736 | Prostheses and Implants |
| D006310 | Hearing Aids |
| D012682 | Sensory Aids |