Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| University of Michigan | OTHER |
| University of Iowa | OTHER |
| Johns Hopkins University | OTHER |
| University of Miami |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Purpose: The purpose of this study is 1) to evaluate the safety and efficacy of currently available multichannel cochlear implant systems for newly implanted adults with an indication based on open-set sentence recognition that expand criteria currently used by Center for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), and 2) to assess the correlation between measures of speech recognition in candidates for cochlear implants and their utility in predicting audiologic and quality of life outcomes after implantation.
Participants: Adults (≥ 65 years of age) and CMS-eligible as a primary source of medical insurance coverage.
Procedures (methods): Evaluate objective and subjective outcomes of cochlear implantation in a patient population that does not meet current CMS candidacy criteria.
Informed Consent will be obtained prior to enrollment in the study, and will include an interview to discuss study expectations, potential risks and benefits and the study evaluation schedule. The Informed Consent Form may be taken home and reviewed by the candidate and the candidate will be given the opportunity to ask questions about it and/or the study prior to signing the form. The candidate will then be given a copy of the signed Informed Consent Form.
The Informed Consent Forms will include a detailed list of procedures included in the pre-operative evaluation process. The Informed Consent document will be reviewed and signed by the relevant parties prior to any study-related evaluation taking place. Testing completed as part of normal clinical practice, such as the audiogram is acceptable prior to signing the consent form.
Information regarding each participant's hearing history will be collected and may be obtained from the participant directly or from their medical record.
The Preoperative evaluation includes:
During preoperative testing, the patient will utilize hearing aids that have been verified as appropriate by the participant's managing audiologist. Clinicians will base the appropriateness of the hearing aid fitting on the recommendations of the American Academy of Audiology Task Force (2006). This includes real ear measures to verify accuracy of the hearing aid settings.
Candidacy Assessment will include
Baseline Measures Speech Perception Testing will include
4. Self-Assessment Questionnaires: Patients will be instructed to complete three questionnaires as they pertain to how they presently hear in everyday listening situations. These questionnaires will also be administered 6 and 12 months post-activation. :
Surgical Procedure: The recommended surgical procedure as outlined in the appropriate surgical manual for the device selected for implantation (provided by the device manufacturer) will be followed by the surgeon.
Postoperative Procedures will be tailored to the needs of the patient, and will vary depending on the type of cochlear implant the patient receives.
Activation should take place 2-4 weeks following surgery, or as soon as the surgeon has determined that the patient is able to participate in such an appointment and should include the following:
The scheduled follow up appointments for recipients will vary depending on the recipient's response to sound, clinic schedule, and distance traveled to the clinic by the recipient. In addition to device activation, it is recommended the audiologist try to meet with patients one, three, six, and twelve months post-activation. Formal testing will be performed six and twelve months post-activation per the study protocol.
Recommended procedures to include in each mapping appointment have been provided to audiologists and include discussion of experience using the device, clarification of any questions regarding device use, listening check of speech processor microphone, impedance telemetry, psychophysical measures,loudness balancing,creation of new speech processor programs if levels have changed, and informal assessment of speech recognition.
Patients should be referred to a speech-language pathologist for formal aural rehabilitation/training if, at the three month interval he/she demonstrates no open-set speech recognition of numbers, colors, or sentences; demonstrates difficulty adjusting to the sound quality of the cochlear implant; if there is a question regarding the presence of coexisting communication difficulties related to a change in cognitive status rather than hearing impairment; or if the recipient requests additional rehabilitation and training that the audiologist is not able to provide.
Post-operative assessments will be performed at the six and twelve month test intervals and will include:
Clinicians will provide participants with traditional rehabilitation, such as orientation to the device, description of strategies to improve hearing, use of assistive devices and accessories to improve performance, listening and communicating over the telephone, and counseling regarding speech recognition outcomes and expectations for performance. Audiologists will provide written materials regarding sources for independent rehabilitation and training.
RISKS AND BENEFITS The pre-specified success criteria for this protocol will be determined based on sentence recognition performance in the best aided condition. Individual levels of margin of effectiveness will be assessed based on post-operative scores on CNC Words and AZ Bio Sentences. A statistically significant improvement in pre- to postoperative performance (six to twelve months postactivation) on scores in the best aided condition will be based on the binomial distribution of Thorton and Raffin, 1978 and the binomial distribution model provided by Spahr et al., 2011.
Risks involved within this study include, but are not limited to, the risks associated with all cochlear implant surgery. It is anticipated that all study participants may permanently lose any residual hearing in the ear to be implanted. The potential benefits of cochlear implantation include improvement in the participant's ability to understand speech in quiet and in noise, with or without lip-reading, and to better detect speech and other environmental sounds.
To monitor device safety (reported through adverse events), medical and audiological observations and procedures, such as adverse device effects and unanticipated adverse device effects, are to be reported to the center's Institutional Review Board (IRB) and also to the study coordinating center. Information on all device malfunctions and adverse events will be obtained from the investigational sites and maintained by event type. The surgeon and audiologist will complete a postoperative Adverse Event Questionnaire at each postoperative test interval if any adverse events have taken place. The questions in the adverse event form elicit information regarding any surgical, medical, and device-related complications for each study participant.
Adverse device effects refer to any undesirable clinical or medical occurrence associated with use of the device or participation in the study. Adverse device effects will be reported if observed, even if they were acknowledged as risk factors in the Informed Consent Form.
Unanticipated adverse device effects refer to any event not identified above that represents a serious adverse effect on health or safety or any life-threatening problem or death caused by, or associated with, a device if that effect, problem or death was not previously identified in nature, severity, or degree of incidence in the investigational plan or application, or any other unanticipated serious problem associated with a device that relates to the rights, safety, or welfare of subjects.
Investigators are to inform their respective Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) and the study coordinator immediately if an unanticipated adverse device effect is suspected (no more than 10 working days after the investigator learns of the effect). If the case is determined to be an unanticipated adverse device effect, the investigator will fill out an Unanticipated Adverse Device Effect Form. The study coordinator will report the results of an evaluation of the unanticipated adverse device effect to the FDA and all other reviewing IRBs and investigators within 10 working days after first receiving notice of the event.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Group A | 45 participants with AzBio baseline sentence scores between 41 - 50% |
| |
| Group B | 45 participants with AzBio baseline sentence scores between 51 - 60%. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cochlear implant | Device | A cochlear implant consists of an implantable device that electrically stimulates surviving nerve fibers within the inner ear to produce perceptions of sound in patients with significant sensorineural hearing loss.. The implanted device is controlled by an external sound processor that converts acoustic sound signals into patterns of electrical stimulation that result in sound perception for the user. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| AzBio sentence score at Baseline/Pre-Surgery, 6 and 12 months | A list of recorded sentences presented to subjects prior to receiving a cochlear implant while they use hearing aids. Subjects repeat each word of the sentence that they can understand and are given a percent correct score based on the percentage of words correctly understood. The test is administered again after receiving a cochlear implant to determine if their ability to recognize words in sentences has improved. | up to 12 months post-cochlear implant. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| CNC Word Test at Baseline/Pre-Surgery, 6 and 12 months | Similar to the HINT sentences test, but instead a list of recorded one-syllable words are presented. The test is administered prior to and after receiving a cochlear implant to determine if their ability to recognize one syllable words has improved. | Prior to receiving a cochlear implant and 6 and 12 months post- cochlear implant. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This study will evaluate the benefits of cochlear implantation in up to 90 CMS-eligible (medicare) adults from up to 10 study sites in the North America.
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Teresa A Zwolan, Ph.D | University of Michigan & American Cochlear Implant Alliance | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| University of Southern California, Department of Otolaryngology, Head & Neck Surgery | Los Angeles | California | 90033 | United States | ||
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 32857106 | Derived | Zwolan TA, Kallogjeri D, Firszt JB, Buchman CA. Assessment of Cochlear Implants for Adult Medicare Beneficiaries Aged 65 Years or Older Who Meet Expanded Indications of Open-Set Sentence Recognition: A Multicenter Nonrandomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2020 Oct 1;146(10):933-941. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2020.2286. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| OTHER |
| NYU Langone Health | OTHER |
| University of North Carolina | OTHER |
| University of Southern California | OTHER |
| Vanderbilt University | OTHER |
| University of Washington | OTHER |
| Washington University School of Medicine | OTHER |
| Loyola University Chicago | OTHER |
| University of Pennsylvania | OTHER |
| University of Texas | OTHER |
| Saint Luke's Health System | OTHER |
| Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary | OTHER |
| Medical College of Wisconsin | OTHER |
| Medical University of South Carolina | OTHER |
| Ohio State University | OTHER |
| Rocky Mountain Ear Center Audiology and Ear Services | UNKNOWN |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| Health Utility Index Mark 3 (HUI3) Questionnaire at Baseline/Pre-Surgery, 6 and 12 months | The HUI is a family of generic health profiles and preference-based systems that measure health status and health-related quality of life. | Prior to receiving a cochlear implant and 6 and 12 months post- cochlear implant. |
| Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) with utility transforms at Baseline/Pre-Surgery, 6 and 12 months | This is a multi-purpose short-form health survey that provides an 8 scale profile of functional health and wellbeing as well as psychometrically-based physical and mental health summary measures and a preference-based health utility index using utility transforms. | 6 and 12 months post- cochlear implant. |
| Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit (APHAB) | This is a 24 item self-assessment questionnaire scored in four subscales: Ease of Communication, Reverberation, Background Noise, and Aversiveness to Sounds. | Prior to receiving a cochlear implant and 6 and 12 months post- cochlear implant. |
| Rocky Mountain Ear Center |
| Englewood |
| Colorado |
| 80113 |
| United States |
| University of Miami, Miller School of Medicine | Miami | Florida | 33136 | United States |
| Loyola University Medical Center - Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery | Chicago | Illinois | 60153 | United States |
| University of Iowa, Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery | Iowa City | Iowa | 52242 | United States |
| Johns Hopkins Listening Center | Baltimore | Maryland | 21287 | United States |
| Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary | Boston | Massachusetts | 02114 | United States |
| University of Michigan, Department of Otolaryngology, Head & Neck Surgery | Ann Arbor | Michigan | 48109 | United States |
| St. Luke's Midwest Ear Institute | Kansas City | Missouri | 64111 | United States |
| Washington University School of Medicine, Department of Otolaryngology, Head & Neck Surgery | St Louis | Missouri | 63110 | United States |
| New York University Medical Center | New York | New York | 10016 | United States |
| University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Department of Otolaryngology, Head & Neck Surgery | Chapel Hill | North Carolina | 27599 | United States |
| The Ohio State University Medical Center | Columbus | Ohio | 43212 | United States |
| University of Pennsylvania Perelman Center for Advanced Medicine | Philadelphia | Pennsylvania | 19104 | United States |
| Medical University of South Carolina | Charleston | South Carolina | 29425 | United States |
| Vanderbilt Bill Wilkerson Center | Nashville | Tennessee | 37232 | United States |
| University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center | Dallas | Texas | 75390 | United States |
| University of Washington, Virginia Merrill Bloedel Hearing Research Center | Seattle | Washington | 98195 | United States |
| Koss Cochlear Implant Program, Medical College of Wisconsin | Milwaukee | Wisconsin | 53226 | United States |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D006316 | Hearing Loss, High-Frequency |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D034381 | Hearing Loss |
| D006311 | Hearing Disorders |
| D004427 | Ear Diseases |
| D010038 | Otorhinolaryngologic Diseases |
| D012678 | Sensation Disorders |
| D009461 | Neurologic Manifestations |
| D009422 | Nervous System Diseases |
| D012816 | Signs and Symptoms |
| D013568 | Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D003054 | Cochlear Implants |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D058117 | Neural Prostheses |
| D058542 | Implantable Neurostimulators |
| D004567 | Electrodes, Implanted |
| D004566 | Electrodes |
| D055615 | Electrical Equipment and Supplies |
| D004864 | Equipment and Supplies |
| D019736 | Prostheses and Implants |
| D006310 | Hearing Aids |
| D012682 | Sensory Aids |
Not provided
Not provided