Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The purpose of this study is to compare the accuracy of the BiancaMed BM07 breathing frequency indicator device with the respiration rate measured by a SomnoScreen RC Easy device on 20+ human volunteers. This is being carried out in support of a 510(k) submission.
The purpose of this study is to compare the accuracy of the BiancaMed BM07 breathing frequency indicator device with the respiration rate measured by a SomnoScreen RC Easy device on 20+ human volunteers. This is being carried out in support of a 510(k) submission.
The BM07 is a non-contact device, using radio frequency (RF) range measurement to detect the chest wall motion, and thus the respiration rate. The BM07 is a CE Class IIa cleared device.
The SomnoScreen RC Easy is both a CE and FDA (K060708) cleared device, used as an overnight, portable sleep recorder. One of its inputs is a pair of chest respiration effort bands that can be used to record the breathing rate of the subject.
The human volunteers are selected to be a range of age, body mass index (BMI) and gender so as to cover a broad cross section of the population. BMI, gender and age are features that might affect the performance of the RF reflected signal:
The target performance is an agreement between the BM07 and the Somnoscreen of +/- 5 breaths per minute. This target has been selected based upon a literature review, in particular:
There is no risk to the subjects as the RF energy emitted by the BM07 is much less than that of either a mobile phone bluetooth or a domestic WLAN router.
The testing is to be carried out on volunteer human subjects, who sign a consent form. The locations of testing are Dublin, Ireland and Belfast, UK.
The testing comprises the subjects sitting still for periods of 2 minutes whilst recordings are taken from both the BM07 and Somnoscreen. The test configurations are ranges from the BM07 to subject of 0.5, 1.0 & 1.5m and 1.0m with a thick folded duvet (overblanket/comforter) covering the subject to represent them wearing thick outdoor winter clothing. Each test configuration is carried out twice, making a total of 8 test recordings per subject.
The first 2 volunteers will be used to confirm that the maximum effective range of the BM07 is at least 1.5 m and that the target aspect of the subject (ie the sensor being in front, to one side and from behind) does not affect the ability of the BM07 to detect breathing movement.
This is an Observational study as the subjects are normal healthy volunteers and no intervention can be made as a result of the study measurements
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Respiration Rate Accuracy - Mean Difference in Breaths Per Minute Between the BM07 5GHz Sensor and SomnoScreen Devices | The respiration rate measured contemporaneously by the BM07 5GHz sensor and the reference device, SomnoScreen, are compared on a second-by-second basis, over the recording duration. The difference between the two respiration rate measurements (the delta) for all 24 subjects' recordings, in all positions, are plotted on a normal distribution chart, giving 10,542 data points. The distribution chart reveals the mean difference between the two devices' measurements and the Standard Deviation (SD). The measure of success is if the 95% (ie 2SD) of the difference in the respiration rate indicated by the two devices (the delta) is less than 5 breaths per minute. This measure is derived from the peer review paper by Lim et al, cited in the References section | Recording duration of 2 minutes; measurement made after 45 seconds settling time, for at least 60 seconds |
Not provided
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria: none
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
twenty two plus volunteer subjects, distributed on the follwoing parameters: gender balance: 1/3:2/3 or better. age range: aged 10 years through to senior citizens BMI range: 19 to 40+, or wider
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Paul D Phillips, MSc, MA | ResMed | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ResMed | Dublin | Dublin 4 | Ireland |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | 5GHz Sensor Spot Respiration Rate | All participants had the difference in indicated breathing rate measured. The 2 devices were the BM07 5GHz non-contact sensor (device under test) and the Somnoscreen (reference device using chest effort bands) |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | 5.8 GHz Sensor Spot Respiration Rate | All participants had the difference in indicated breathing rate measured. The 2 devices were the BM07 5GHz non-contact sensor (device under test) and the Somnoscreen (reference device using chest effort bands) |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Categorical | Count of Participants |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Respiration Rate Accuracy - Mean Difference in Breaths Per Minute Between the BM07 5GHz Sensor and SomnoScreen Devices | The respiration rate measured contemporaneously by the BM07 5GHz sensor and the reference device, SomnoScreen, are compared on a second-by-second basis, over the recording duration. The difference between the two respiration rate measurements (the delta) for all 24 subjects' recordings, in all positions, are plotted on a normal distribution chart, giving 10,542 data points. The distribution chart reveals the mean difference between the two devices' measurements and the Standard Deviation (SD). The measure of success is if the 95% (ie 2SD) of the difference in the respiration rate indicated by the two devices (the delta) is less than 5 breaths per minute. This measure is derived from the peer review paper by Lim et al, cited in the References section | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | breaths per minute | Recording duration of 2 minutes; measurement made after 45 seconds settling time, for at least 60 seconds |
|
adverse events were collected during the 2 minute period that participants were taking part in the evaluation
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | 5.8 GHz Sensor Spot Respiration Rate | All participants had the difference in indicated breathing rate measured. The 2 devices were the BM07 5GHz non-contact sensor (device under test) and the Somnoscreen (reference device using chest effort bands) |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| General | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | Non-systematic Assessment | The nature of the device is that it is not acting on the subject. It just monitors the general breathing rate whilst the subjects are sitting still. Thus no serious or non serious adverse events were expected and non were reported |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| General | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | Non-systematic Assessment | The nature of the device is that it is not acting on the subject. It just monitors the general breathing rate whilst the subjects are sitting still. No adverse events occurred during the evaluation |
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Paul Phillips | ResMed | +353 1 716 3755 | paul.phillips@resmed.com |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Participants |
|
| Age, Continuous | Mean | Standard Deviation | years |
|
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Region of Enrollment | Number | participants |
|
All participants had the difference in indicated breathing rate measured. The 2 devices were the BM07 5GHz non-contact sensor (device under test) and the Somnoscreen (reference device using chest effort bands) |
|
|
| 0 |
| 24 |
| 0 |
| 24 |
|
|
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided