Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10-CC-0217 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Background:
- Currently, standard procedures for biopsies that are guided by computed tomography (CT) imaging involve CT scans and a computer program to plan and illustrate where the physician will place the needle to obtain the required cells or tissue. Inserting the biopsy needle at the planned angle is not an easy task, because the appropriate angle of insertion must be estimated based on prior experience. Researchers are studying experimental techniques that might provide better guidance about the right angle to insert the biopsy needle and thereby improve the collection of the appropriate biopsy cells or tissue.
Objectives:
- To evaluate the effectiveness of two biopsy needle guidance methods in CT-guided tissue biopsy.
Eligibility:
- Individuals at least 18 years of age who are scheduled to have CT-guided tissue biopsy.
Design:
Background:
Currently, standard/conventional CT-guided biopsies proceed as follows the physician:
obtains a pre-procedural CT scan,
plans the needle s angle based on this CT scan,
selects the angle at which the needle should be inserted based on the pre-procedural CT scan,
inserts the needle while aiming to replicate that planned needle angle by using only their visual-spatial abilities, and
re-images the patient to confirm needle location followed by needle
repositioning, if needed.
Improving upon these standard methods of needle placement could have
widespread benefits (e.g. improved diagnostic tissue sampling, decreased
needle repositionings, etc.) We will be studying three needle angle selection systems. The laser-assisted needle angle selection system or LNASS, is a custom fabricated device that uses a Class II pointer similar to ones used for pointing at slides during lectures.
Objectives:
Eligibility:
Ages Eligible for Study: 18 Years and older
Genders Eligible for Study: Both
Inclusion:
Exclusion:
No serious concurrent medical illness that would preclude the patient from making a rational informed decision on participation.
Any known allergy to plastics or polymers (since the Ultem polymer could theoretically induce a rash in these patients, even though it is hypoallergenic).
Pacemakers or automatic implantable cardiac defibrillators.
Gross body weight above the CT table limit (450 pounds).
Design:
Primary outcome measure for the first arm is:
--The difference between planned and achieved needle angle of a laser-assisted needle angle selection system with the standard method (clinician s intuition or conventional method) of CT-guided biopsy.
Primary outcome measure for the second arm is:
--The difference between planned and achieved needle angle of a block with pre-drilled needle angles with the standard method (clinician s intuition or conventional method) of CT-guided biopsy
Primary outcome for the third arm is:
--The difference between planned and achieved needle angle of a mobile device-assisted needle angle selection system with the standard method (clinician's intuition or conventional method) of CT-guided biopsy.
The tool for measuring the needle angles will be an FDA-approved electromagnetic tracking system, which tracks needle movement and position.
These comparisons will be done as a bystander study.
Needle guidance system will only be used initially to select the angle during a superficial, shallow needle insertion at the skin surface (less than 1 cm deep).
At no time will the needle enter tissue that it wouldn t have otherwise entered as none of the system will be used to perform the biopsies at this time.
The key portions of the procedure will not be altered in any substantive way.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| B-NASS | Experimental | Block assisted needle angle selection system |
|
| L-NASS | Experimental | laser assisted needle angle selection system |
|
| MD-NASS | Experimental | mobile-device assisted needle angle selection system |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Needle angle measurement | Device | The tool for measuring the needle angles will be an FDA-approved EM tracking system. At no time will the needle enter tissue that it wouldn t have otherwise entered as neither system will be used to perform the biopsies at this time. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Difference between L-NASS and standard method | Data is currently undergoing analysis | Completion of study |
| Differnce between B-NASS and standard method | Data is currently undergoing analysis | Completion of study |
| The difference between MD-NASS and standard method | Data is currently undergoing analysis | Completion of study |
Not provided
Not provided
Patients must fulfill all of the following criteria to be eligible for study admission:
EXCLUSION CRITERIA:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Bradford J Wood, M.D. | National Institutes of Health Clinical Center (CC) | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| National Institutes of Health Clinical Center | Bethesda | Maryland | 20892 | United States |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7997570 | Background | Miaux Y, Guermazi A, Gossot D, Bourrier P, Angoulvant D, Khairoune A, Turki C, Bouche E. Laser guidance system for CT-guided procedures. Radiology. 1995 Jan;194(1):282-4. doi: 10.1148/radiology.194.1.7997570. | |
| 9809074 | Background | Pereles FS, Baker M, Baldwin R, Krupinski E, Unger EC. Accuracy of CT biopsy: laser guidance versus conventional freehand techniques. Acad Radiol. 1998 Nov;5(11):766-70. doi: 10.1016/s1076-6332(98)80260-2. |
| Label | URL |
|---|---|
| NIH Clinical Center Detailed Web Page | View source |
Not provided
It is not yet known if there will be a plan to make IPD available and still undecided.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D008175 | Lung Neoplasms |
| D008113 | Liver Neoplasms |
| D007680 | Kidney Neoplasms |
| D009369 | Neoplasms |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D012142 | Respiratory Tract Neoplasms |
| D013899 | Thoracic Neoplasms |
| D009371 | Neoplasms by Site |
| D008171 | Lung Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| 9933397 | Background | Jacobi V, Thalhammer A, Kirchner J. Value of a laser guidance system for CT interventions: a phantom study. Eur Radiol. 1999;9(1):137-40. doi: 10.1007/s003300050644. |
| D012140 |
| Respiratory Tract Diseases |
| D004067 | Digestive System Neoplasms |
| D004066 | Digestive System Diseases |
| D008107 | Liver Diseases |
| D014571 | Urologic Neoplasms |
| D014565 | Urogenital Neoplasms |
| D052776 | Female Urogenital Diseases |
| D005261 | Female Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy Complications |
| D000091642 | Urogenital Diseases |
| D007674 | Kidney Diseases |
| D014570 | Urologic Diseases |
| D052801 | Male Urogenital Diseases |