A Phase 3, Randomized, Controlled, Double-Blind, Multinational Clinical Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Vosaroxin and Cytarabine Versus Placebo and Cytarabine in Patients With First Relapsed or Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia (VALOR)
A Phase 3, Randomized, Controlled, Double-Blind, Multinational Clinical Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Vosaroxin and Cytarabine Versus Placebo and Cytarabine in Patients With First Relapsed or Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia (VALOR)
This study compared treatment groups of patients treated with vosaroxin and cytarabine versus patients treated with placebo and cytarabine.
The study includes additional objectives to ones listed above as Outcome Measures. These additional objectives also compared treatment groups in the following:
CR + CRp rate, defined as CR + CRp based on modified IWG response criteria.
Combined CR rate (CR+CRp+CRi).
Percentage of patients who have post-treatment (subsequent) transplantation.
Percentage of patients who received subsequent non-protocol therapy (including transplantation).
Safety and tolerability.
In keeping with FDA guidance for adaptive trial designs, the study incorporated an independent DSMB (Drug Safety Monitoring Board) to address potential uncertainty concerning the true treatment affect between the treatment groups and to address a deterioration of power from a small difference. Sunesis remained blinded and had no involvement in the interim data analysis, interpretation, or adaptive design. Based on the results of the interim data analysis the DSMB recommended an increase in the target number of deaths from 375 in 450 patients to 562 in 675 patients which based on a 5% dropout rate increased enrollment from 475 to 712.
The primary analysis was performed when the target number of deaths had been achieved based on a permuted block randomization procedure, stratified by disease status (refractory, first relapse with duration of first CR or CRp ≥ 90 days and < 12 months, or first relapse with duration of first CR or CRp ≥ 12 months and ≤ 24 months), age (< 60 years or ≥ 60 years), and geographic location (US or outside US). The study included periods of screening, treatment / hematologic recovery, post-treatment follow-up, and long-term follow-up for survival.
Follow-up was monthly during the first year, every 2 months during the second year, and every 3 months thereafter until death, withdrawal of consent, or loss to follow-up, whichever occurred first. Long-term follow-up began for all patients when the required number of deaths for primary analysis had been met; thereafter, survival data were collected every 4 months until death, withdrawal of consent, or loss to follow-up, whichever occurred first.
The long term follow-up for this study continues at this time and the September 2014 date reflects database lock for primary analyses reflected in the Results Section. During long term follow-up Sunesis is not collecting Adverse Events.
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Denver, Colorado 80218, United States
Washington D.C., District of Columbia 20037, United States
Chicago, Illinois 60612, United States
Indianapolis, Indiana 46237, United States
Columbia, Missouri 65203, United States
Hackensack, New Jersey 07601, United States
Houston, Texas 77030, United States
Morgantown, West Virginia 26506, United States
Adelaide, South Australia 5000, Australia
Parkville, Victoria 3050, Australia
Graz, 8036, Austria
Salzburg, 5020, Austria
Prague, Srobarova 100 34 Praha 10, Czechia
Hradec Králové, 500 05, Czechia
Pierre-Bénite, 69495, France
Frankfurt, 65929, Germany
Hamburg, 20246, Germany
Kiel, 24116, Germany
Munich, 81675, Germany
Ferrara, 44121, Italy
Novara, 28100, Italy
Grafton, Auckland 1023, New Zealand
Poznan, 60-569, Poland
Seoul, 135-710, South Korea
Blackpool, FY3 8NR, United Kingdom
Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, United Kingdom
Cottingham, GY16 5JQ, United Kingdom
Leicester, LE1 5WW, United Kingdom