Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
To evaluate the performance of PillCam COLON 2 in regards to detection of patients with polyps where colonoscopy is considered as the gold standard reference.
Standard evaluation of subjects with suspected colon diseases includes endoscopic imaging by colonoscopy and radiology testing such as: air-contrast barium enema, abdominal/pelvic CT, or virtual colonoscopy.
The Given® Diagnostic System offers an alternative approach for endoscopic visualization of the colon. Advantages of the Given® Diagnostic System include the elimination of the need for conscious sedation, the minimally invasive, painless nature of the exam, and the ability to pursue normal daily activities immediately following the procedure . Furthermore, compared to standard colonoscopy, the Given® Diagnostic System may be more readily accepted by the subjects, thereby improving subjects' willingness to undergo a diagnostic evaluation of the colon and comply with colorectal cancer screening recommendations.
The PillCam™ SB capsule (formerly M2A® Capsule) that was cleared by the FDA- in August 2001 for small bowel evaluation has been ingested to date by more than 1,000,000 people worldwide and is well accepted by patients and physicians as well as the professional societies. However, adequate visualization of the colon cannot be achieved with the standard PillCam™ SB capsule because of the anatomical and physiological properties of the colon which are significantly different than the small bowel. Moreover, other issues that limit the evaluation of the colonic mucosa by the standard PillCam™ SB procedure include an unsatisfactory level of colon cleanliness and slow progression of the PillCam™ SB capsule through the colon during the desired examination time. Therefore, the development and introduction of a specially designed, customized colon capsule combined with a dedicated capsule colonoscopy procedure protocol will allow for more efficient evaluation of the colonic mucosa. This is expected to improve the capability of the Given® Diagnostic System to detect colonic pathologies and to serve as a diagnostic and screening tool for colonic disease. To date, several clinical studies have been conducted with Given® Diagnostic System and the PillCam™ Colon 1 capsule A pilot multicenter study is currently being conducted with a new Given® Diagnostic System and an advanced generation of the the PillCam™ Colon capsule - PillCam™ Colon 2. Capsule. The new development of Given® Diagnostic System and PillCam™ Colon 2 capsule is primarily aimed to increase sensitivity and specificity for polyp detection.
Further details of the Given® Diagnostic System and PillCam™ Colon 2 capsule can be found in the device description section.
This study is designed to evaluate the performance of the new version of Given® Diagnostic System and PillCam™ Colon 2 capsule in detecting patients with polyps and other colonic lesions as compared to conventional colonoscopy.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Experimental | Subjects that are indicated for colonoscopy, who are suspected or known to suffer from large bowel diseases. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PillCamâ„¢ (Capsule Endoscopy) Colon 2 capsule | Device | Medical Device |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy of Detection in Patients With Colonic Polyps - Sensitivity | The accuracy parameters (i.e. sensitivity) were evaluated for detection of patients with polyps equal or larger than 6 mm and for detection of patients with polyps equal or larger than 10 mm by constructing 2X2 matrix (i.e. PCCE-2 performance versus the standard colonoscopy), where sensitivity and specificity, are presented with 95% Cl based on the binomial distribution. Standard colonoscopy is considered the gold standard. | within 7 days |
| Accuracy of Detection in Patients With Colonic Polyps - Specificity | The accuracy parameters (i.e. specificity) were evaluated for detection of patients with polyps equal or larger than 6 mm and for detection of patients with polyps equal or larger than 10 mm by constructing 2X2 matrix (i.e. PCCE-2 performance versus the standard colonoscopy), where sensitivity and specificity, are presented with 95% Cl based on the binomial distribution. Standard colonoscopy is considered the gold standard. | within 7 days |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Diagnostic Yield of PillCamâ„¢ COLON 2 in Detecting Colonic Lesions | The diagnostic yield (%) of PCCE-2 and colonoscopy in visualizing a variety of colonic lesion excluding polyps (e.g. inflammation, diverticulosis and bleeding lesions) is provided. | within 7 days |
| Percent of Participants With Scoring Index 3 or 4 (Good or Excellent) |
Not provided
Inclusion criteria:
Subject is between the ages of 18-70
Subject was referred to colonoscopy for at least one of the following reasons:
Exclusion criteria
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Douglas Rex, Dr. | Division of Gastroenterology, Indiana University Medical Center | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Indiana University Medical Center | Indianapolis | Indiana | 46202 | United States | ||
| University of North Carolina |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 27195129 | Derived | Morgan DR, Malik PR, Romeo DP, Rex DK. Initial US evaluation of second-generation capsule colonoscopy for detecting colon polyps. BMJ Open Gastroenterol. 2016 May 3;3(1):e000089. doi: 10.1136/bmjgast-2016-000089. eCollection 2016. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Colon Capsule Endoscopy, Then Standard Colonoscopy | Capsule endoscopy was ingested following colon preparation without colon insufflation or sedation.The purpose was to detect patients with polyps equal or larger than 6mm. Patients subsequently had standard colonoscopy as "gold standard" comparison.. |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | |||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
|
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Colon Capsule Endoscopy, Then Standard Colonoscopy | Capsule endoscopy was ingested following colon preparation without colon insufflation or sedation.The purpose was to detect patients with polyps equal or larger than 6mm. Patients subsequently had standard colonoscopy as "gold standard" comparison.. |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Categorical | Count of Participants |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Accuracy of Detection in Patients With Colonic Polyps - Sensitivity | The accuracy parameters (i.e. sensitivity) were evaluated for detection of patients with polyps equal or larger than 6 mm and for detection of patients with polyps equal or larger than 10 mm by constructing 2X2 matrix (i.e. PCCE-2 performance versus the standard colonoscopy), where sensitivity and specificity, are presented with 95% Cl based on the binomial distribution. Standard colonoscopy is considered the gold standard. | Patients were included in the study due to a referral for colonoscopy for a variety of reasons such as recent change of bowel habits, prior positive findings, rectal bleeding, abdominal pain or a positive FOBT. | Posted | Number | 95% Confidence Interval | percentage of sensiivity | within 7 days |
|
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Colon Capsule Endoscopy, Then Standard Colonoscopy | Capsule endoscopy was ingested following colon preparation without colon insufflation or sedation.The purpose was to detect patients with polyps equal or larger than 6mm. Patients subsequently had standard colonoscopy as "gold standard" comparison.. |
Not provided
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| bruising to abdomen | Gastrointestinal disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hilla Debby/Director of clinical affairs | Givenimaging | 972490977740 | 77740 | hila.debby@givenimaging.com |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D003108 | Colonic Diseases |
| D007410 | Intestinal Diseases |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D005767 | Gastrointestinal Diseases |
| D004066 | Digestive System Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D053704 | Capsule Endoscopy |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D016099 | Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal |
| D016145 | Endoscopy, Digestive System |
| D004724 | Endoscopy |
| D003949 | Diagnostic Techniques, Surgical |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Overall colon cleanliness was judged for capsule endoscopy and colonoscopy on a four-point grading index scale as follows:
|
| within 7 days |
| Capsule Excretion Time | Capsule excretion time is defined as the duration of ingestion to capsule excretion time. The distribution of excretion times were categorized as follows:
| within 7 days |
| Chapel Hill |
| North Carolina |
| 27599 |
| United States |
| Digestive Care, Inc. | Beavercreek | Ohio | 45440 | United States |
| Gastroenterology Associates of Tidewater | Chesapeake | Virginia | 23320 | United States |
| Participants |
|
| Age, Continuous | Mean | Standard Deviation | years |
|
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Region of Enrollment | Number | participants |
|
|
|
| Primary | Accuracy of Detection in Patients With Colonic Polyps - Specificity | The accuracy parameters (i.e. specificity) were evaluated for detection of patients with polyps equal or larger than 6 mm and for detection of patients with polyps equal or larger than 10 mm by constructing 2X2 matrix (i.e. PCCE-2 performance versus the standard colonoscopy), where sensitivity and specificity, are presented with 95% Cl based on the binomial distribution. Standard colonoscopy is considered the gold standard. | Patients were included in the study due to a referral for colonoscopy for a variety of reasons such as recent change of bowel habits, prior positive findings, rectal bleeding, abdominal pain or a positive FOBT. | Posted | Number | 95% Confidence Interval | percentage of specificity | within 7 days |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Diagnostic Yield of PillCamâ„¢ COLON 2 in Detecting Colonic Lesions | The diagnostic yield (%) of PCCE-2 and colonoscopy in visualizing a variety of colonic lesion excluding polyps (e.g. inflammation, diverticulosis and bleeding lesions) is provided. | Patients were included in the study due to a referral for colonoscopy for a variety of reasons such as recent change of bowel habits, prior positive findings, rectal bleeding, abdominal pain or a positive FOBT. | Posted | Number | percentage of yield | within 7 days |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Percent of Participants With Scoring Index 3 or 4 (Good or Excellent) | Overall colon cleanliness was judged for capsule endoscopy and colonoscopy on a four-point grading index scale as follows:
| Patients were included in the study due to a referral for colonoscopy for a variety of reasons such as recent change of bowel habits, prior positive findings, rectal bleeding, abdominal pain or a positive FOBT. | Posted | Number | 95% Confidence Interval | percentage of participants | within 7 days |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Capsule Excretion Time | Capsule excretion time is defined as the duration of ingestion to capsule excretion time. The distribution of excretion times were categorized as follows:
| All subject who ingested the capsule were included in this analysis | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | within 7 days |
|
|
|
| 0 |
| 51 |
| 0 |
| 51 |
| 3 |
| 51 |
| Left eye pain | Eye disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Abdominal Pain | Gastrointestinal disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
Not provided
Not provided
| D019937 | Diagnostic Techniques and Procedures |
| D003933 | Diagnosis |
| %Patients Yield Angiodysplasia |
|
| Decending Colon |
|
| Transverse Colon |
|
| Ascending Colon |
|
| Cecum |
|
| Title | Measurements |
|---|---|
|
| excreted 8hr+ |
|