Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| European Chiropractors Union | UNKNOWN |
| National Institute for Chiropractic Research | UNKNOWN |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The primary purpose of this study was to compare the relative effectiveness of cervical manipulation, mobilisation and the Activator instrument in the treatment of subacute non-specific neck pain. The secondary purpose was to describe any adverse effects of these treatments.
Neck pain is a common disorder. About 70% of adults will experience neck pain during their lifetime. After low back pain, neck pain is the most common reason patients give for seeking chiropractic care, and the second most common reason for the use of spinal manipulation. Usually, the underlying cause of neck pain is non-specific and cannot be related to a particular pathology as a cause of the presenting symptoms. Due to the uncertainty of the results obtained in the limited number of studies of manipulation and mobilisation for neck pain, further studies are needed to compare the different therapies available for neck pain. Participants in the study were treated as they would normally be with the exception of the type of spinal manipulation. There were three groups: a manipulation group, a mobilisation group, and an Activator instrument group.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| manipulation | Procedure | |||
| Mobilisation | Procedure | |||
| Activator instrument | Device |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Patient Global Impression of Change | end of treatment, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Numerical rating scale for pain | end of treatment, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months | |
| Bournemouth Questionnaire | end of treatment, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months | |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Hugh A Gemmell, DC. EdD | Asociación Española contra el Cáncer | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anglo-European College of Chiropractic Out Patient Clinic | Bournemouth | Dorset | BH5 2DF | United Kingdom |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Adverse effects to treatment |
| end of treatment |
| SF-36 version 2 | end of treatment, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D019547 | Neck Pain |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D010146 | Pain |
| D009461 | Neurologic Manifestations |
| D012816 | Signs and Symptoms |
| D013568 | Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |
Not provided
Not provided