Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-005483-21 | EudraCT Number |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| University of Oslo | OTHER |
| The Dam Foundation | OTHER |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Acute neck is very common in the general population and often causes disability over shorter or longer time periods. Unfortunately, the efficacy of chiropractic spinal manipulative therapy (CSMT) and the efficacy of Non-steroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs (NSAIDs) on acute neck pain is unknown. This 4-arm randomized controlled trial (RCT) will likely provide evidence for the efficacy of CSMT as well as NSAIDs. The applied methodology of the study will aim towards the highest research standards possible for manual-therapy RCTs, thus avoiding typical methodological shortcomings from previous manual-therapy studies. Our aim is to establish evidence-based knowledge on the efficacy of CSMT and NSAIDs in the treatment of acute neck pain.
The Global Burden of Disease study ranks musculoskeletal neck pain as the most common disability worldwide. This study will highlight and validate CSMT for acute neck pain, compared to sham manipulation, ibuprofen and placebo medication. NSAIDs are the most frequently prescribed medications by GPs worldwide and are widely used for patients with back pain. However, evidence-based data are missing for acute neck pain patients treated with NSAIDs while existing evidence for CSMT for acute neck pain are limited by serious methodological shortcomings.
The 4-arm placebo-controlled RCT will assess the efficacy in the following four treatment groups:
We intend to invite 40 recruiting chiropractors from larger Norwegian cities, distributed by gender and geography. The study participants presenting to each chiropractor will be block-randomized equally into one of four study groups based on a computer-generated algorithm. Each chiropractor will include 16 participants, four into each arm. A total of 320 participants will be enrolled in the RCT, within 12 months. Participants randomized into the chiropractic treatment groups will receive 5 interventions over 12 days, i.e., CSMT or CSMT sham manipulation; while the pharmacological groups will receive 600mg ibuprofen or placebo administered 3 times daily for 12 days.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chiropractic Spinal Manipulative Therapy (CSMT) | Experimental | A specific contact, high-velocity, low-amplitude, spinal thrust manipulation directed to spinal biomechanical dysfunction in the cervical and/or thoracic spinal column, as diagnosed by standard chiropractic tests, in accordance with their clinical judgment. |
|
| CSMT sham manipulation | Sham Comparator | A broad non-specific contact, low-velocity, low-amplitude sham push manoeuvre in a non-therapeutic directional line. |
|
| Ibuprofen | Active Comparator | Ibuprofen 600mg, 3 times daily for 12 days. |
|
| Placebo medication | Sham Comparator | Placebo medication, x 3 times daily for 12 days. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chiropractic spinal manipulative therapy (CSMT) | Other | See study arm. |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Mean pain intensity change | Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) 0-10 | From Day-0 to Day-14 between CSMT and sham CSMT, CSMT and ibuprofen, and CSMT and placebo medicine. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Mean pain intensity change | Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) 0-10 | From Day-0 to Day-14. Comparison between ibuprofen and placebo medicine. |
| Mean pain intensity change | Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) 0-10 |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Sick leave | Number of days and grade of sick leave | Mean number of days at Day-0 compared to Week-12 and Week-24 post-treatment. |
| Validation of user ID-number | Number and proportions of incorrect typing of ID-numbers during digital questionnaire completion. |
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Contraindication to ibuprofen
Taken pain- and/or anti-inflammatory medicine during the past 24 hours? (Patients that have taken acute pain- and/or anti-inflammatory medicine, including ibuprofen, can be included if they come back after 24 hours without having taken the medicine where they then fill out questionnaires and are randomized at the clinic)
On prescribed antidepressant
Major psychiatric disorder
Pregnancy or intention to be pregnant
Contraindication to SMT
Signs of spinal radiculopathy including progressive neurological deficit
Upper cervical spine instability (positive Sharp-Purser test)
Previous fracture in the cervical and/or thoracic spine
Previous cervical spine surgery
Recent (<6 months) severe physical trauma to the head, neck or thoracic spine within the previous 6 months
Concomitant low back pain with moderate, severe or very severe pain intensity (≥4 on a NRS)
Current chronic pain (defined as ≥3 months duration)
Rheumatoid arthritis
Recent (<2 weeks) acute respiratory infection with fever
Any presence of ischemic symptoms upon examination
Horner's syndrome
Medical history of arterial anomalies
History of connective tissue disorder
Familial history of cervical artery dissection
Other vascular disorders
Inability to understand instructions given in the Norwegian language
Inability to fill out digital questionnaires
Other reasons to exclude the patient as deemed necessary by the chiropractor
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anna J. Allen-Unhammer, PhD student | Contact | +4792870783 | a.j.allen-unhammer@medisin.uio.no | |
| Michael B. Russell, Professor | Contact | +4540171553 | m.b.russell@medisin.uio.no |
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Michael B. Russell, Professor | Division for Research and Innovation, Akershus University Hospital, Norway | Study Director |
| Aleksander Chaibi, PhD | Institute for Health and Society, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Norway |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Michael B. Russell | Recruiting | Oslo | 1478 | Norway |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 34768531 | Background | Chaibi A, Stavem K, Russell MB. Spinal Manipulative Therapy for Acute Neck Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials. J Clin Med. 2021 Oct 28;10(21):5011. doi: 10.3390/jcm10215011. | |
| 26145718 | Background | Chaibi A, Saltyte Benth J, Bjorn Russell M. Validation of Placebo in a Manual Therapy Randomized Controlled Trial. Sci Rep. 2015 Jul 6;5:11774. doi: 10.1038/srep11774. |
| Label | URL |
|---|---|
| Background and rationale for the RCT | View source |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D007052 | Ibuprofen |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D010666 | Phenylpropionates |
| D000146 | Acids, Carbocyclic |
| D002264 | Carboxylic Acids |
| D009930 | Organic Chemicals |
Not provided
Not provided
A 4-arm parallel clinical placebo randomized controlled Trial.
Not provided
Not provided
Participants are blinded. The two chiropractor groups are single-blinded, while the two pharmacological groups are double-blinded. Chiropractor investigators are un-blinded in relation to the manual therapy they apply. Outcome assessors are blinded to group allocation of participants during the study and data analysis.
| CSMT sham manipulation | Other | See study arm. |
|
| Ibuprofen | Drug | See study arm. |
|
|
| Placebo medication | Drug | See study arm. |
|
|
| From Day-0 to Day 2-13 in the treatment period, and from Day-0 to Day 7, 28, 56, 84 and 168 post-treatment, respectively, and comparison between CSMT and sham CSMT, CSMT and ibuprofen, CSMT and placebo medicine, ibuprofen and placebo medicine. |
| Mean duration (hours) of neck pain change | Hours (0-24) | From Day-0 to Day 2-13 and 14; From Day-0 to Day 7, 28, 56, 84 and 168 post-treatment, respectively, and comparison between CSMT and sham CSMT, CSMT and ibuprofen, CSMT and placebo medicine, ibuprofen and placebo medicine. |
| Mean number of days with neck pain per week | Weekly number of days | From the treatment period (14 days) to the periods; day 1-7, 22-28, 50-56, 78-84 and 162-168 post-treatment, respectively, and comparison between CSMT and sham CSMT, CSMT and ibuprofen, CSMT and placebo medicine, ibuprofen and placebo medicine. |
| Proportions of participants with mean daily pain intensity reduction of ≥50%, ≥75% and 100% | Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) 0-10 | From Day-0 to Day 2-13 and 14, and from Day-0 to Day 7, 28, 56, 84 and 168 post-treatment, respectively, and comparison between CSMT and sham CSMT, CSMT and ibuprofen, CSMT and placebo medicine, ibuprofen and placebo medicine. |
| Proportions of participants with mean duration (hours) reduction of ≥50%, ≥75% and 100% | Hours 0-24 | From Day-0 to Day 2-13 and 14, and from Day-0 to Day 7, 28, 56, 84 and 168 post-treatment, respectively, and comparison between CSMT and sham CSMT, CSMT and ibuprofen, CSMT and placebo medicine, ibuprofen and placebo medicine. |
| Proportions of participants with mean reduction of number of days with neck pain per week of ≥50%, ≥75% and 100% | Weekly number of days | From the treatment period (14 days), to the periods: Day 1-7, 22-28, 50-56, 78-84 and 162-168 post-treatment, respectively, and comparison between CSMT and sham CSMT, CSMT and ibuprofen, CSMT and placebo medicine, ibuprofen and placebo medicine |
| Improvement in Research and development 12 (RAND-12) score (12 questions each with 5 possible answers) | RAND-12 Term Short Form Health Survey (0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better physical and mental health functioning) | From Day-0 to Day-14, Day-84 and 168 post-treatment, respectively, comparison between CSMT and sham CSMT, CSMT and ibuprofen, CSMT and placebo medicine, ibuprofen and placebo medicine. |
| Improvement in Neck Disability Index score (10 questions each with 6 possible answers) | Neck Disability Index (0-100, where 0 = no disability and 100 = complete disability) | From Day-0 to Day-14, Day-84 and 168 post-treatment, respectively, comparison between CSMT and sham CSMT, CSMT and ibuprofen, CSMT and placebo medicine, ibuprofen and placebo medicine. |
| Adverse event (AE) analysis | Within and between group adverse events analysis | Daily during intervention period (day 2-13). AE analysis of CSMT, sham CSMT, ibuprofen, and placebo medicine, and comparison between CSMT and sham CSMT, CSMT and ibuprofen, CSMT and placebo medicine, ibuprofen and placebo medicine. |
| Analysis of patients' blinding (Manual therapy) | Numerical rating scale (NRS) 0-10 in relation to receiving real CSMT (0 absolutely unsure and 10 absolutely sure that real CSMT was received), irrespective of whether the patient received sham or real CSMT | Daily during intervention period (Day-0, Day 2-13). Analysis of CSMT and sham CSMT, and comparison between CSMT and sham CSMT. |
| Analysis of patients' blinding (Medicine) | Numerical rating scale (NRS) 0-10 in relation to receiving ibuprofen (0 absolutely unsure and 10 absolutely sure that ibuprofen was received), irrespective of whether the patient received ibuprofen or placebo medicine | Daily during intervention period (Day-0, Day 2-13). Analysis of ibuprofen and placebo medicine, and comparison between ibuprofen and placebo medicine. |
| Patients' and chiropractors' expectations to treatment efficacy | Numerical rating scale (NRS) 0-10 (0 no expectation at all and 10 the highest possible expectation to treatment efficacy) | Day-0 |
| Analysis of patients' satisfaction to treatment efficacy | Numerical rating scale (NRS) 0-10 (0 no satisfaction at all, and 10 the highest possible satisfaction) | Day-14 of the intervention period |
| All digital questionnaires from Day-0 to study completion, that is to 24-weeks follow-up. |
| Facilitatory/inhibitory factors/dilemmas affecting recruitment Qualitative focus group interviews to explore facilitatory/inhibitory factors and possible dilemmas experienced by chiropractor investigators. | Qualitative focus group interviews with all chiropractor investigators. | Up to 6 months |
| 38060549 | Derived | Chaibi A, Allen-Unhammer A, Kopke Vollestad N, Russell MB. Chiropractic spinal manipulative therapy for acute neck pain: A 4-arm clinical placebo randomized controlled trial. A prospective study protocol. PLoS One. 2023 Dec 7;18(12):e0295115. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0295115. eCollection 2023. |
| CSMT Sham manipulation procedure | View source |