Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Advanced Dialysis Center of Potomac | INDUSTRY |
| Advanced Dialysis Center of Easton | INDUSTRY |
| Gambro Renal Products, Inc. | INDUSTRY |
| Baxter Healthcare Corporation |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The purpose of this study is to collect information on the ease of use and thrombogenicity of the Polyflux HD-C4 Big and Fresenius Optiflux 180NR or 200NR dialyzers under conditions of routine clinical use for hemodialysis.
This ease of use study involves the use of FDA 510(k) cleared hemodialyzers and will have no impact on the patient's routine dialysis therapy. This study is aimed at obtaining feedback from the nursing and technical staff regarding the use and thrombogenicity of the Polyflux HD-C4 Big, and Fresenius Optiflux 180NR or 200NR dialyzers. The dialysis nursing staff will complete ease of use and thrombogenicity assessments following routine dialysis therapy. Any adverse events will be tracked for the study patients.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Ease of Use: Priming Blood Side | For every study treatment/dialyzer, the nursing staff rated the ease of priming blood side as follows: Very Easy:Air is easily removed without knocking or clamping procedures. Acceptable:Knocking and/or clamping required for efficient air removal. Difficult:Knocking and/or clamping and additional volume of saline or extended recirculation needed to remove air. Very Difficult:Air could not be removed. | Priming at each treatment |
| Ease of Use: Priming Dialysate Side | For every study treatment/dialyzer, the nursing staff rated the ease of priming dialysate side as follows: Dialysate Side at 500 ml Priming Volume (check one): Perfect: No air visible. Acceptable: Some air visible, but considered insignificant. Not Acceptable: Additional actions needed to sufficiently remove air. | Priming at each treatment |
| Dialyzer Assessment: Fiber Condition | For every study treatment/dialyzer, the nursing staff rated the condition of the dialyzer fibers after rinse-back as follows: Very Good:All fibers appear white. Good:Few fibers (less than 10) appear PINK / RED. (check one) Poor:Several fibers (more than 10) appear PINK / RED. (check one) Very Poor:Most fibers (more than 75%) appear PINK / RED. (check one) | Each treatment: assessment of the condition of the dialyzer fibers after rinse-back |
| Dialyzer Assessment: Arterial Header Condition | For every study treatment/dialyzer, the nursing staff rated the condition of the arterial header after rinse-back as follows: Very Good:Surface as clean as expected. Good:Distinct red ring appears at the dialyzer wall. Poor:Significant appearance of clots, randomly distributed on the surface. Very Poor:Completely red and/or covered with clots. | Each treatment: assessment of the condition of the arterial header after rinse-back |
| Dialyzer Assessment: Venous Header Condition |
Not provided
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Assessment of dialyzer ease of use and thrombogenicity assessments following routine dialysis therapy of 33 adult patients (18 years of age or older)
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Advanced Dialysis Center of Easton | Easton | Maryland | 21601 | United States | ||
| Advanced Dialysis Center of Potomac |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Hemodialysis Patients | Hemodialysis patients 18 years of age or older receiving routine dialysis treatment for chronic renal failure. |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Weeks 1-2: Assessment of 180NR or 200NR |
| |||||||||||||
| Weeks 3-4: Assessment of HD-C4 Big |
|
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Hemodialysis Patients | Hemodialysis patients 18 years of age or older receiving routine dialysis treatment for chronic renal failure. |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | Mean |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Ease of Use: Priming Blood Side | For every study treatment/dialyzer, the nursing staff rated the ease of priming blood side as follows: Very Easy:Air is easily removed without knocking or clamping procedures. Acceptable:Knocking and/or clamping required for efficient air removal. Difficult:Knocking and/or clamping and additional volume of saline or extended recirculation needed to remove air. Very Difficult:Air could not be removed. | Posted | Number | Number of Dialyzers | Priming at each treatment | Dialyzers | Dialyzers |
|
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Hemodialysis Patients | Hemodialysis patients 18 years of age or older receiving routine dialysis treatment for chronic renal failure. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Global CORP Clinical Trials Disclosure | Vantive | +1 2249484283 | Global.CORP.ClinicalTrialsDisclosure@vantive.com |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D007676 | Kidney Failure, Chronic |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D051436 | Renal Insufficiency, Chronic |
| D051437 | Renal Insufficiency |
| D007674 | Kidney Diseases |
| D014570 | Urologic Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
| INDUSTRY |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
For every study treatment/dialyzer, the nursing staff rated the condition of the venous header after rinse-back as follows: Very Good:Surface as clean as expected. Good:Distinct red ring appears at the dialyzer wall. Poor:Significant appearance of clots, randomly distributed on the surface. Very Poor:Completely red and/or covered with clots. |
| Each treatment: the assessment of the condition of the venous header after rinse-back |
| Arlington |
| Virginia |
| 22202-2714 |
| United States |
| years |
|
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Height | Mean | Standard Deviation | inches |
|
|
|
| Primary | Ease of Use: Priming Dialysate Side | For every study treatment/dialyzer, the nursing staff rated the ease of priming dialysate side as follows: Dialysate Side at 500 ml Priming Volume (check one): Perfect: No air visible. Acceptable: Some air visible, but considered insignificant. Not Acceptable: Additional actions needed to sufficiently remove air. | Posted | Number | Number of Dialyzers | Priming at each treatment | Dialyzers | Dialyzers |
|
|
|
| Primary | Dialyzer Assessment: Fiber Condition | For every study treatment/dialyzer, the nursing staff rated the condition of the dialyzer fibers after rinse-back as follows: Very Good:All fibers appear white. Good:Few fibers (less than 10) appear PINK / RED. (check one) Poor:Several fibers (more than 10) appear PINK / RED. (check one) Very Poor:Most fibers (more than 75%) appear PINK / RED. (check one) | Posted | Number | Number of Dialyzers | Each treatment: assessment of the condition of the dialyzer fibers after rinse-back | Dialyzers | Dialyzers |
|
|
|
| Primary | Dialyzer Assessment: Arterial Header Condition | For every study treatment/dialyzer, the nursing staff rated the condition of the arterial header after rinse-back as follows: Very Good:Surface as clean as expected. Good:Distinct red ring appears at the dialyzer wall. Poor:Significant appearance of clots, randomly distributed on the surface. Very Poor:Completely red and/or covered with clots. | Posted | Number | Number of Dialyzers | Each treatment: assessment of the condition of the arterial header after rinse-back | Dialyzers | Dialyzers |
|
|
|
| Primary | Dialyzer Assessment: Venous Header Condition | For every study treatment/dialyzer, the nursing staff rated the condition of the venous header after rinse-back as follows: Very Good:Surface as clean as expected. Good:Distinct red ring appears at the dialyzer wall. Poor:Significant appearance of clots, randomly distributed on the surface. Very Poor:Completely red and/or covered with clots. | Posted | Number | Number of Dialyzers | Each treatment: the assessment of the condition of the venous header after rinse-back | Dialyzers | Dialyzers |
|
|
|
| 0 |
| 33 |
| 0 |
| 33 |
Not provided
Not provided
| D052776 |
| Female Urogenital Diseases |
| D005261 | Female Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy Complications |
| D000091642 | Urogenital Diseases |
| D052801 | Male Urogenital Diseases |
| D002908 | Chronic Disease |
| D020969 | Disease Attributes |
| D010335 | Pathologic Processes |
| D013568 | Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |
| Title | Measurements |
|---|---|
|
| Title | Measurements |
|---|---|
|
| Poor |
|
| Very Poor |
|
| Title | Measurements |
|---|---|
|
| Poor |
|
| Very Poor |
|
| Title | Measurements |
|---|---|
|
| Poor |
|
| Very Poor |
|