Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Terminated for lack of resources to complete.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center | OTHER |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
A study which assesses the physician's comfort level and satisfaction when using the e2TM Collector compared to the Spatula/SytoBrush technique.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| e2TM Cervical Cell Collector | Device |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Physician comfort level and satisfaction when using the e2TM Collector compared to the standard spatula/cytobrush. | Each physician will be surveyed after first and last use of the e2TM collector as well as three more times spaced at near regular intervals in between. |
Not provided
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Jay Pinkerton, MD | University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| University Hospital CASE Medical Center | Cleveland | Ohio | 44106 | United States |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 12571259 | Background | Munoz N, Bosch FX, de Sanjose S, Herrero R, Castellsague X, Shah KV, Snijders PJ, Meijer CJ; International Agency for Research on Cancer Multicenter Cervical Cancer Study Group. Epidemiologic classification of human papillomavirus types associated with cervical cancer. N Engl J Med. 2003 Feb 6;348(6):518-27. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa021641. | |
| 11693978 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Sankaranarayanan R, Budukh AM, Rajkumar R. Effective screening programmes for cervical cancer in low- and middle-income developing countries. Bull World Health Organ. 2001;79(10):954-62. Epub 2001 Nov 1. |
| 1575861 | Background | Umland B, Waterman R, Wiese W, Duban S, Mennin S, Kaufman A. Learning from a rural physician program in China. Acad Med. 1992 May;67(5):307-9. doi: 10.1097/00001888-199205000-00004. No abstract available. |
| 10451450 | Background | Holowaty P, Miller AB, Rohan T, To T. RESPONSE: re: natural history of dysplasia of the uterine cervix. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1999 Aug 18;91(16):1420A-1421. doi: 10.1093/jnci/91.16.1420a. No abstract available. |
| 11966386 | Background | Solomon D, Davey D, Kurman R, Moriarty A, O'Connor D, Prey M, Raab S, Sherman M, Wilbur D, Wright T Jr, Young N; Forum Group Members; Bethesda 2001 Workshop. The 2001 Bethesda System: terminology for reporting results of cervical cytology. JAMA. 2002 Apr 24;287(16):2114-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.287.16.2114. |
| 10819705 | Background | Nanda K, McCrory DC, Myers ER, Bastian LA, Hasselblad V, Hickey JD, Matchar DB. Accuracy of the Papanicolaou test in screening for and follow-up of cervical cytologic abnormalities: a systematic review. Ann Intern Med. 2000 May 16;132(10):810-9. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-132-10-200005160-00009. |
| 7702044 | Background | Fahey MT, Irwig L, Macaskill P. Meta-analysis of Pap test accuracy. Am J Epidemiol. 1995 Apr 1;141(7):680-9. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a117485. |
| 11401314 | Background | Clavel C, Masure M, Bory JP, Putaud I, Mangeonjean C, Lorenzato M, Nazeyrollas P, Gabriel R, Quereux C, Birembaut P. Human papillomavirus testing in primary screening for the detection of high-grade cervical lesions: a study of 7932 women. Br J Cancer. 2001 Jun 15;84(12):1616-23. doi: 10.1054/bjoc.2001.1845. |
| 15774236 | Background | Willis BH, Barton P, Pearmain P, Bryan S, Hyde C. Cervical screening programmes: can automation help? Evidence from systematic reviews, an economic analysis and a simulation modelling exercise applied to the UK. Health Technol Assess. 2005 Mar;9(13):1-207, iii. doi: 10.3310/hta9130. |
| 8942687 | Background | Buntinx F, Brouwers M. Relation between sampling device and detection of abnormality in cervical smears: a meta-analysis of randomised and quasi-randomised studies. BMJ. 1996 Nov 23;313(7068):1285-90. doi: 10.1136/bmj.313.7068.1285. |
| 10577637 | Background | Martin-Hirsch P, Lilford R, Jarvis G, Kitchener HC. Efficacy of cervical-smear collection devices: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet. 1999 Nov 20;354(9192):1763-70. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(99)02353-3. |
| 10796736 | Background | Martin-Hirsch P, Jarvis G, Kitchener H, Lilford R. Collection devices for obtaining cervical cytology samples. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000;2000(2):CD001036. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001036. |
| 10907927 | Background | Selvaggi SM, Guidos BJ. Specimen adequacy and the ThinPrep Pap Test: the endocervical component. Diagn Cytopathol. 2000 Jul;23(1):23-6. doi: 10.1002/1097-0339(200007)23:13.0.CO;2-K. |
| 16218317 | Background | Marchand L, Mundt M, Klein G, Agarwal SC. Optimal collection technique and devices for a quality pap smear. WMJ. 2005 Aug;104(6):51-5. |
| 11214608 | Background | Koss LG. Evolution in cervical pathology and cytology: a historical perspective. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol. 2000;21(6):550-4. No abstract available. |