Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This study will assess the Minimally Invasive Esophageal Cytology Collection System in Patients with Barrett's Esophagus or GERD Symptoms.
This is a cross-sectional study of subjects with Barrett's esophagus (BE) to assess the utility of the Cytosponge device as a non-endoscopic method for collecting surface cells from the esophagus. This study will enroll 2 groups of subjects: 1) Subjects presenting for routine endoscopic BE surveillance examinations (n=120), and 2) Subjects with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) symptoms undergoing upper endoscopy for screening for BE (n=55). After informed consent, and on the same day as the endoscopic procedure, the subject will undergo administration of the Cytosponge device and complete a questionnaire. The subject will then undergo routine upper endoscopy, with assessment of BE (where applicable), and biopsy per accepted surveillance or screening recommendations. The Cytosponge will be placed in fixative and shipped to an accredited pathology laboratory for embedding in paraffin and hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining to assess the adequacy of the specimen. Further evaluation of the specimen may be performed using trefoil factor 3 (TFF3). If the Cytosponge tissue specimen is inadequate, the subject will be recalled for a repeat sponge procedure (not endoscopy) 30 days later. Routine care tissue biopsies will undergo standard processing and H&E staining at the home institution, with assessment by expert gastrointestinal pathologists. Subjects will be contacted via phone 7 days (+/- 2 days) after Cytosponge administration to complete additional questionnaires and assess adverse events.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Patient wth Barrett's | Experimental | Subjects presenting for routine endoscopic BE surveillance examinations |
|
| Patients with GERD | Experimental | Subjects with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) symptoms undergoing upper endoscopy for screening for BE |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cytospongeâ„¢ Cell Collection Device | Device | Cytospongeâ„¢ Cell Collection Device is indicated for use in the collection and retrieval of surface cells in the esophagus. |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Procedure Preference and Acceptability Questionnaire and Visual Analog Scale | The first primary objective of the study was to assess the acceptability of a novel, minimally invasive esophageal mucosal sampling technique, the Cytospongeâ„¢, in subjects undergoing surveillance of BE who have had at least a C1 or M3 segment confirmed, and 2) in subjects with GERD undergoing screening for BE. This includes measures of acceptability as demonstrated on the Impact of Event Scale, a Visual Analog Scale for Pain, and the subject's willingness to undergo repeat Cytospongeâ„¢ administration if it were offered to him/her. The Visual Analog Scale is measured from 0-100 scale for pain, 0 representing no pain and 100 representing the highest level of pain. | Immediately post procedure up to 7 days +/- 3 days |
| Number of Participants With Adequate Cytospongeâ„¢ Sample | To assess the adequacy of cytology samples obtained by Cytosponge in this population after 1 sampling, and after 2 samplings if first sample inadequate. | Immediately post procedure up to 7 days +/- 3 days |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Characteristics | The operating characteristics of this technique against a gold standard of upper endoscopy with biopsies for endoscopic surveillance in subjects with BE who demonstrate an adequate sample on Cytosponge assessment. | Immediately post procedure up to 7 days +/- 3 days |
| Cytospongeâ„¢ Operating Characteristics vs Worst Histology Ever |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Amanda Cafaro, BSN | Medtronic Clinical Research Director | Study Director |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Univeristy of California, Los Angeles | Los Angeles | California | 90095 | United States | ||
| University of Colorado |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Patient Wth Barrett's | Subjects presenting for routine endoscopic BE surveillance examinations Cytospongeâ„¢ Cell Collection Device: Cytospongeâ„¢ Cell Collection Device is indicated for use in the collection and retrieval of surface cells in the esophagus. |
| FG001 | Patients With GERD | Subjects with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) symptoms undergoing upper endoscopy for screening for BE Cytospongeâ„¢ Cell Collection Device: Cytospongeâ„¢ Cell Collection Device is indicated for use in the collection and retrieval of surface cells in the esophagus. |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | |||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
|
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Patient Wth Barrett's | Subjects presenting for routine endoscopic BE surveillance examinations Cytospongeâ„¢ Cell Collection Device: Cytospongeâ„¢ Cell Collection Device is indicated for use in the collection and retrieval of surface cells in the esophagus. |
| BG001 | Patients With GERD |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | Mean |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Procedure Preference and Acceptability Questionnaire and Visual Analog Scale | The first primary objective of the study was to assess the acceptability of a novel, minimally invasive esophageal mucosal sampling technique, the Cytospongeâ„¢, in subjects undergoing surveillance of BE who have had at least a C1 or M3 segment confirmed, and 2) in subjects with GERD undergoing screening for BE. This includes measures of acceptability as demonstrated on the Impact of Event Scale, a Visual Analog Scale for Pain, and the subject's willingness to undergo repeat Cytospongeâ„¢ administration if it were offered to him/her. The Visual Analog Scale is measured from 0-100 scale for pain, 0 representing no pain and 100 representing the highest level of pain. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Units on a scale | Immediately post procedure up to 7 days +/- 3 days |
|
Subjects will be contacted 7 days (+/- 2 days) following the Cytosponge and upper endoscopy procedures. During this phone call, adverse events will be assessed and subjects will complete questionnaires. Participation in the study is complete when subjects have completed the follow-up phone call.
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Patient Wth Barrett's | Subjects presenting for routine endoscopic BE surveillance examinations who had at least a C1 or M3 segment confirmed (or medically suspected). Cytospongeâ„¢ Cell Collection Device: Cytospongeâ„¢ Cell Collection Device is indicated for use in the collection and retrieval of surface cells in the esophagus. |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sponge Detachment | Product Issues | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oropharyngeal pain | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | Systematic Assessment |
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dr.Jaime Kean | Medtronic MITG Gastrointestinal & Hepatology | 303-882-6759 | Jaime.M.Kean@medtronic.com |
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot | Yes | No | No | Study Protocol | Dec 1, 2017 | Apr 24, 2019 | Prot_000.pdf |
| SAP | No | Yes | No | Statistical Analysis Plan | Aug 20, 2018 | Jun 6, 2019 | SAP_001.pdf |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001471 | Barrett Esophagus |
| D005764 | Gastroesophageal Reflux |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D011230 | Precancerous Conditions |
| D009369 | Neoplasms |
| D004935 | Esophageal Diseases |
| D005767 | Gastrointestinal Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The second secondary objective was to assess the operating characteristics of Cytospongeâ„¢ against the worst ever histology documented in the subject. |
| Immediately post procedure up to 7 days +/- 3 days |
| Cytospongeâ„¢ Operating Characteristics as a Function of Baseline Histology | The third secondary objective was to assess the operating characteristics of Cytospongeâ„¢ as a function of baseline histology. At the outset of this study, no data was available regarding the accuracy of TFF3 in samples collected by Cytospongeâ„¢ in subjects with BE and more advanced disease (low-grade dysplasia and high-grade dysplasia). These subjects are at greatest risk for progression to cancer. We planned to collect pilot data on operating characteristics of the assay by degree of baseline dysplasia. We hypothesized that TFF3 would perform with similar operating characteristics in this group compared to non-dysplastic BE. | Immediately post procedure up to 7 days +/- 3 days |
| Summary of Abrasion, Bleeding, and Perforation Observed Via Endoscopy | The fourth secondary objective was to assess the degree of mucosal abrasion following Cytospongeâ„¢ administration, using a standardized scale. The incidence is presented in the data below for abrasion, bleeding and perforation observed during Endoscopy. | Immediately post procedure up to 7 days +/- 3 days |
| Ongoing Safety Measures | To collect and analyze ongoing safety measures of Cytosponge use in the target population. | Immediately post procedure up to 7 days +/- 3 days |
| Aurora |
| Colorado |
| 80045 |
| United States |
| Northwestern University | Chicago | Illinois | 60611 | United States |
| University of North Carolina | Chapel Hill | North Carolina | 27599-7080 | United States |
| Gastrointestinal Associates | Knoxville | Tennessee | 37909 | United States |
| Physician Decision |
|
| Protocol Violation |
|
| Failure to swollow sponge twice |
|
| Patient did not return for procedure |
|
| Subject not eligible |
|
Subjects with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) symptoms undergoing upper endoscopy for screening for BE Cytospongeâ„¢ Cell Collection Device: Cytospongeâ„¢ Cell Collection Device is indicated for use in the collection and retrieval of surface cells in the esophagus. |
| BG002 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| years |
|
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized | In Patients with GERD, one patient was both American Indian Or Alaska Native and Asian. | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
|
|
| Primary | Number of Participants With Adequate Cytospongeâ„¢ Sample | To assess the adequacy of cytology samples obtained by Cytosponge in this population after 1 sampling, and after 2 samplings if first sample inadequate. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | Immediately post procedure up to 7 days +/- 3 days |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Operating Characteristics | The operating characteristics of this technique against a gold standard of upper endoscopy with biopsies for endoscopic surveillance in subjects with BE who demonstrate an adequate sample on Cytosponge assessment. | Posted | Number | 95% Confidence Interval | Percentage | Immediately post procedure up to 7 days +/- 3 days |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Cytospongeâ„¢ Operating Characteristics vs Worst Histology Ever | The second secondary objective was to assess the operating characteristics of Cytospongeâ„¢ against the worst ever histology documented in the subject. | Posted | Number | 95% Confidence Interval | Percentage | Immediately post procedure up to 7 days +/- 3 days |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Cytospongeâ„¢ Operating Characteristics as a Function of Baseline Histology | The third secondary objective was to assess the operating characteristics of Cytospongeâ„¢ as a function of baseline histology. At the outset of this study, no data was available regarding the accuracy of TFF3 in samples collected by Cytospongeâ„¢ in subjects with BE and more advanced disease (low-grade dysplasia and high-grade dysplasia). These subjects are at greatest risk for progression to cancer. We planned to collect pilot data on operating characteristics of the assay by degree of baseline dysplasia. We hypothesized that TFF3 would perform with similar operating characteristics in this group compared to non-dysplastic BE. | Among study subjects with BE that exhibited HGD, there were no true negatives or false positives, therefore specificity of the assay was not calculated for this subgroup. | Posted | Number | Percentage | Immediately post procedure up to 7 days +/- 3 days |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Summary of Abrasion, Bleeding, and Perforation Observed Via Endoscopy | The fourth secondary objective was to assess the degree of mucosal abrasion following Cytospongeâ„¢ administration, using a standardized scale. The incidence is presented in the data below for abrasion, bleeding and perforation observed during Endoscopy. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | Immediately post procedure up to 7 days +/- 3 days |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Ongoing Safety Measures | To collect and analyze ongoing safety measures of Cytosponge use in the target population. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | Immediately post procedure up to 7 days +/- 3 days |
|
|
|
| 0 |
| 129 |
| 2 |
| 129 |
| 8 |
| 129 |
| EG001 | Patients With GERD | Subjects with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) symptoms undergoing screening for BE Cytospongeâ„¢ Cell Collection Device: Cytospongeâ„¢ Cell Collection Device is indicated for use in the collection and retrieval of surface cells in the esophagus. | 0 | 62 | 0 | 62 | 6 | 62 |
| Throat Irritation | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Dyspepsia | Gastrointestinal disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Vomiting | Gastrointestinal disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Device Breakage | Product Issues | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Chest Discomfort | General disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Not Coded | Investigations | Systematic Assessment |
|
Not provided
Not provided
| D004066 |
| Digestive System Diseases |
| D015154 | Esophageal Motility Disorders |
| D003680 | Deglutition Disorders |
| Title | Measurements |
|---|---|
|
| Accuracy |
|
| Title | Measurements |
|---|---|
|
| Negative Predictive Value |
|
| Accuracy |
|
| Specificity |
|
| Accuracy |
|
| Title | Measurements |
|---|
|
| Bleeding-From Biopsy Site |
|
| Perforation |
|
| Any of These 3 Conditions |
|