Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| FDA Office of Orphan Products Development | FED |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This is a medical research study.
The study investigators have developed a method to gradually repair pectus excavatum (sunken chest) deformity by placing a magnet on the sternum (breastbone) and then applying an external magnetic force that will pull the sternum outward gradually.
Potential candidates for this study are children and adolescents with a previously diagnosed congenital pectus excavatum (sunken chest) deformity who are otherwise healthy and are seeking corrective surgery for their condition. They will be residents of the U.S. and between the ages of 8 and 14 years of age. Potential candidates and their families will have already been counseled about this condition and about the standard way to repair this deformity.
The purpose of this study is to test what effects, good and/or bad, placing an external/internal magnetic device has on correcting pectus excavatum deformity in children, and the safety of using such a device for treatment.
Pectus excavatum is the most common congenital chest wall abnormality in children. Surgical correction requires a big operation under general anesthesia which forces the sternum forward and holds it in place using a metal chest wall strut. Deformation of the chest wall under great pressure may result in complications and potential relapses as well as postoperative pain requiring hospitalization for regional and narcotic anesthesia for up to a week. An alternative principle for correction of chest wall and other deformities is gradual (bit-by-bit) correction using minimal force applied over many months (like moving teeth with orthodontic braces).
The hypothesis of this study is that constant outward force on the deformed cartilage in pectus excavatum will produce biologic reformation of cartilage and correction of the chest wall deformity.
The study investigators have developed a novel method of achieving gradual deformation/reformation of chest wall cartilage without the need for transdermal orthopedic devices or repeated surgeries. A magnetic force field is used to apply controlled, sustained force to promote biologic reformation of structural cartilage (the same principle as distraction osteogenesis). A magnet is implanted on the sternum and secured using a novel fixation strategy that can be accomplished through a 3-cm subxyphoid incision as a brief outpatient procedure. The magnet (and sternum) is pulled outward by another magnet suspended in a novel, low-profile, lightweight device previously molded to the patient's anterior chest wall. The external magnet allows individual adjustment in small increments of the distance (and, thus, force) and orientation of the force applied to the sternum. The low-profile, non-obtrusive anterior chest wall prosthesis is held in place by the force field between the two magnets.
The study objectives are to test the safety and probable benefit of this procedure in 10 otherwise healthy, young patients, between 8 years and 14 years of age, who have chosen to have this deformity corrected using this novel technique rather than the standard Ravitch or Nuss techniques. We will document the rate of correction by chest imaging and measurement of the Pectus Severity Index. The study investigators will document safety and efficacy with an EKG prior to implantation, one month post-implantation, and finally after the magnet is removed, as well as patient and family satisfaction with a post-procedure Quality of Life-type survey.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3MP - Treatment Arm | Experimental | Magnetic Mini-Mover Procedure using the Magnimplant and Magnatract |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Magnetic Mini-Mover Procedure (3MP) | Device | A rare earth magnet encased in FDA-approved titanium will be implanted securely on the outer surface of the lower end of the sternum in patients with pectus excavatum. This is accomplished as an outpatient procedure, under brief general anesthesia. A 2-inch transverse skinline incision is made at the junction of the sternum and xyphoid and the space in front and behind the sternum is dissected bluntly. The titanium can containing the magnet is securely fixed to the sternum by screwing it into a titanium fixation disk in front of the sternum. The procedure takes 1/2-hour, and the patient can go home the same day. In another outpatient procedure, the Magnimplant is explanted 18 months after implantation. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Affect on Cardiac Activity | EKG performed prior to implantation, one month post-implantation, and after explanation to evaluate whether magnetic field near the heart adversely affects cardiac activity. Outcome measure describes number of patients who experienced adverse change in EKG. | One month post-explantation |
| Damage/Discoloration to Skin | Outcome measure is number of patients who experienced permanent skin damage or discoloration due to external brace wear | One-month post-explant |
| Efficacy: Patient Satisfaction | Based on patient response to one-year post-explantation QoL questionnaire: How satisfied are you with the correction of your chest? Ratings: 5-very satisfied; 4-satisfied; 3-unsure; 2-dissatisfied; 1-very dissatisfied | One year post-explant |
| Efficacy: Patient Recommendation of Treatment | Based on patient response to one-year post-explantation QoL statement: "I would recommend this treatment for pectus excavatum (sunken chest) to someone else with pectus excavatum." Ratings: 5-strongly agree; 4-agree; 3-unsure; 2-disagree; 1-strongly disagree | One year post-explanation |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Patient Compliance | Compliance measured by average number of hours per day external device was worn by patient, as measured by the data sensor and logging device built into external prosthetic | 18 months active Rx |
Not provided
Residents of the United States with previously diagnosed pectus excavatum who are referred to the UCSF Pediatric Surgery Service for evaluation and treatment will be considered for participation in this study. Only patients with moderate to severe pectus excavatum who meet all the inclusion criteria will participate. The patient and family will be fully counseled and consented about the risks and benefits of participation in the study, and will be asked to sign an informed consent reviewed and approved by the UCSF Committee on Human Research.
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Michael R Harrison, MD | University of California, San Francisco Medical Center and Children's Hospital | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| University of California, San Francisco | San Francisco | California | 94143-0570 | United States |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 13295996 | Background | RAVITCH MM. The operative treatment of pectus excavatum. J Pediatr. 1956 Apr;48(4):465-72. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(56)80075-9. No abstract available. | |
| 13588724 | Background | WELCH KJ. Satisfactory surgical correction of pectus excavatum deformity in childhood; a limited opportunity. J Thorac Surg. 1958 Nov;36(5):697-713. No abstract available. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Physician- or self-referral to the Chest Wall Deformity Clinic at UCSF for evaluation of pectus excavatum. Active recruitment from 2007-2009 to accrue ten subjects.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | 3MP Treatment Arm | Undergo active Magnetic Mini-Mover Procedure for treatment of pectus excavatum. Active treatment = 18 months |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | 3MP Treatment Arm | Undergo active Magnetic Mini-Mover Procedure for treatment of pectus excavatum. Active treatment = 18 months |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Categorical | Between 8 and 14 years of age |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Affect on Cardiac Activity | EKG performed prior to implantation, one month post-implantation, and after explanation to evaluate whether magnetic field near the heart adversely affects cardiac activity. Outcome measure describes number of patients who experienced adverse change in EKG. | Per protocol, this is a single-arm, pilot study of ten subjects. | Posted | Number | participants | One month post-explantation |
|
|
3 years
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Magnetic Mini-Mover Treatment | Use of the Magnimplant and Magnatract to treat pectus excavatum |
Not provided
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wound infection | Surgical and medical procedures | Systematic Assessment |
Technical problems with measurement of PSI. PSI is uninformative in assessing efficacy of treatment as it is a dynamic measure that varies with patient position and respiration at any given measurement.
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Michael Harrison, MD | UCSF-Benioff Children's Hospital | 415 476-2538 | pedsurg@ucsfmedctr.org |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D005660 | Funnel Chest |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001848 | Bone Diseases, Developmental |
| D001847 | Bone Diseases |
| D009140 | Musculoskeletal Diseases |
| D009139 | Musculoskeletal Abnormalities |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
|
| Magnatract (external magnet in a removable external brace) | Device | An external orthotic device "Magnatract" which includes an external magnet in a removable brace is fitted specifically to the patient's chest wall deformity. A calibrated meter in the external device measures the force applied between the two magnets. When the patient and family are comfortable with the device and comfort and skin condition have been assessed, the patient will be allowed to take the Magnatract home and begin the process of gradually advancing the sternum forward as the abnormal costal cartilage is reformed. |
|
|
| 3MP (Magnetic Mini-Mover Procedure) | Procedure |
|
|
|
| 1616728 | Background | Morshuis WJ, Mulder H, Wapperom G, Folgering HT, Assman M, Cox AL, van Lier HJ, Vincent JG, Lacquet LK. Pectus excavatum. A clinical study with long-term postoperative follow-up. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 1992;6(6):318-28; discussion 328-9. doi: 10.1016/1010-7940(92)90149-r. |
| 13681493 | Background | ADKINS PC, BLADES B. A stainless steel strut for correction of pectus escavatum. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1961 Jul;113:111-3. No abstract available. |
| 8641129 | Background | Shamberger RC. Congenital chest wall deformities. Curr Probl Surg. 1996 Jun;33(6):469-542. doi: 10.1016/s0011-3840(96)80005-0. No abstract available. |
| 12368998 | Background | Nuss D, Croitoru DP, Kelly RE Jr, Goretsky MJ, Nuss KJ, Gustin TS. Review and discussion of the complications of minimally invasive pectus excavatum repair. Eur J Pediatr Surg. 2002 Aug;12(4):230-4. doi: 10.1055/s-2002-34485. |
| 5038952 | Background | Beiser GD, Epstein SE, Stampfer M, Goldstein RE, Noland SP, Levitsky S. Impairment of cardiac function in patients with pectus excavatum, with improvement after operative correction. N Engl J Med. 1972 Aug 10;287(6):267-72. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197208102870602. No abstract available. |
| 12778393 | Background | Lawson ML, Cash TF, Akers R, Vasser E, Burke B, Tabangin M, Welch C, Croitoru DP, Goretsky MJ, Nuss D, Kelly RE Jr. A pilot study of the impact of surgical repair on disease-specific quality of life among patients with pectus excavatum. J Pediatr Surg. 2003 Jun;38(6):916-8. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3468(03)00123-4. |
| 2294364 | Background | Wynn SR, Driscoll DJ, Ostrom NK, Staats BA, O'Connell EJ, Mottram CD, Telander RL. Exercise cardiorespiratory function in adolescents with pectus excavatum. Observations before and after operation. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1990 Jan;99(1):41-7. |
| 10836238 | Background | Haller JA Jr, Loughlin GM. Cardiorespiratory function is significantly improved following corrective surgery for severe pectus excavatum. Proposed treatment guidelines. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 2000 Feb;41(1):125-30. |
| 10657820 | Background | Zhao L, Feinberg MS, Gaides M, Ben-Dov I. Why is exercise capacity reduced in subjects with pectus excavatum? J Pediatr. 2000 Feb;136(2):163-7. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(00)70096-5. |
| 4073662 | Background | Mead J, Sly P, Le Souef P, Hibbert M, Phelan P. Rib cage mobility in pectus excavatum. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1985 Dec;132(6):1223-8. doi: 10.1164/arrd.1985.132.6.1223. |
| 10803331 | Background | Shamberger RC. Cardiopulmonary effects of anterior chest wall deformities. Chest Surg Clin N Am. 2000 May;10(2):245-52, v-vi. |
| 12970011 | Background | Malek MH, Fonkalsrud EW, Cooper CB. Ventilatory and cardiovascular responses to exercise in patients with pectus excavatum. Chest. 2003 Sep;124(3):870-82. doi: 10.1378/chest.124.3.870. |
| 10693675 | Background | Hebra A, Swoveland B, Egbert M, Tagge EP, Georgeson K, Othersen HB Jr, Nuss D. Outcome analysis of minimally invasive repair of pectus excavatum: review of 251 cases. J Pediatr Surg. 2000 Feb;35(2):252-7; discussion 257-8. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3468(00)90019-8. |
| 15017558 | Background | Park HJ, Lee SY, Lee CS. Complications associated with the Nuss procedure: analysis of risk factors and suggested measures for prevention of complications. J Pediatr Surg. 2004 Mar;39(3):391-5; discussion 391-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2003.11.012. |
| 15868580 | Background | Weber TR. Further experience with the operative management of asphyxiating thoracic dystrophy after pectus repair. J Pediatr Surg. 2005 Jan;40(1):170-3. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2004.09.039. |
| 12375767 | Background | Fonkalsrud EW, Reemtsen B. Force required to elevate the sternum of pectus excavatum patients. J Am Coll Surg. 2002 Oct;195(4):575-7. doi: 10.1016/s1072-7515(02)01245-0. No abstract available. |
| 9628377 | Result | Kowalewski J, Barcikowski S, Brocki M. Cardiorespiratory function before and after operation for pectus excavatum: medium-term results. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 1998 Mar;13(3):275-9. doi: 10.1016/s1010-7940(97)00326-6. |
| Count of Participants |
| Participants |
|
| Age, Continuous | Mean | Standard Deviation | years |
|
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Region of Enrollment | Number | participants |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Patient Compliance | Compliance measured by average number of hours per day external device was worn by patient, as measured by the data sensor and logging device built into external prosthetic | Per protocol | Posted | Mean | Full Range | avg hours per day brace worn | 18 months active Rx |
|
|
|
| Primary | Damage/Discoloration to Skin | Outcome measure is number of patients who experienced permanent skin damage or discoloration due to external brace wear | Per protocol | Posted | Number | participants | One-month post-explant |
|
|
|
| Primary | Efficacy: Patient Satisfaction | Based on patient response to one-year post-explantation QoL questionnaire: How satisfied are you with the correction of your chest? Ratings: 5-very satisfied; 4-satisfied; 3-unsure; 2-dissatisfied; 1-very dissatisfied | Per protocol | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Scores on a scale | One year post-explant |
|
|
|
| Primary | Efficacy: Patient Recommendation of Treatment | Based on patient response to one-year post-explantation QoL statement: "I would recommend this treatment for pectus excavatum (sunken chest) to someone else with pectus excavatum." Ratings: 5-strongly agree; 4-agree; 3-unsure; 2-disagree; 1-strongly disagree | Per protocol | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Scores on a scale | One year post-explanation |
|
|
|
| 0 |
| 10 |
| 5 |
| 10 |
| Re-operation | Surgical and medical procedures | Non-systematic Assessment | Re-operation to loosen overtightened implant; reattach or replace non-functional device; removal of devices that had a mechanical failure |
|
Not provided
Not provided
| D000013 | Congenital Abnormalities |
| D009358 | Congenital, Hereditary, and Neonatal Diseases and Abnormalities |