Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| FD-R-01FD-03341 | Other Grant/Funding Number | FDA |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Shriners Hospitals for Children | OTHER |
| Children's Mercy Hospital Kansas City | OTHER |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This study is a Phase 3, multicenter, non-randomized study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the next-generation outpatient Magnetic Mini-Mover Procedure (3MP) in 15 patients aged 8-14 years for the correction of pectus excavatum ('sunken chest'). 3MP for pectus excavatum uses a magnetically coupled implant to pull the sternum forward and gradually remodel the deformed costal cartilage. The Funding Source for this trial is the FDA Office of Orphan Products Development (Grant #R01 FD003341).
Pectus excavatum is the most common congenital chest wall abnormality in children. The investigators have developed a novel method of achieving gradual deformation/reformation of chest wall cartilage. A magnetic force field is used to apply controlled, sustained force to promote biologic reformation of structural cartilage. A magnet is implanted on the sternum and secured through a 2-inch subxiphoid incision as a one-hour outpatient procedure. The magnet (and sternum) is pulled outward by another magnet suspended in a novel, low-profile, lightweight device previously molded to the patient's anterior chest wall. The low-profile, non-obtrusive anterior chest wall prosthesis is held in place by the force field between the two magnets.
In the single-center, FDA-funded trial (IDE G050196), the investigators tested proof of concept, safety and probable benefit of this procedure in 10. In this Phase III multicenter trial, the investigators will further test the safety and efficacy of the procedure in 15 otherwise healthy patients with moderate-to-severe PE, ages 8 to 14. The investigators will be using the next generation Magnetic Mini-Mover Magnimplant device (IDE G090006), a design the investigators believe is much improved in terms of safety and ease of implantation/explantation. Implantation of the Magnimplant will be accomplished in an outpatient procedure. The investigators will document the rate of correction by comparing chest X-ray measurement of the Pectus Severity Index prior to implantation, to that measured after the magnet is removed. Treatment will last 18-24 months, depending on correction and when the patient has completed his or her pubertal growth spurt, as documented by hand x-ray. Explant of the device will be accomplished in an outpatient procedure. The investigators will document safety with an EKG prior to implantation, one month post-implantation, and finally after the magnet is removed. The investigators will document efficacy by comparing pre- and post-treatment PSI, as well as by evaluating patient satisfaction with a post-procedure Quality of Life-type survey. Long-term follow-up will occur at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months after explantation.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Treatment Arm | Experimental | This is a non-randomized study in which otherwise healthy patients, ages 8-14, with severe pectus excavatum (PSI > 3.5) will undergo the interventional treatment arm by having outpatient surgery and the Magnetic MIni-Mover Magnimplant procedure is performed during which the magnetic implant is surgically placed. After 2 years of treatment with the implanted magnet and brace treatment, the Magnetic Mini-Mover Magnimplant will be explanted. After surgery and recovery, all subjects will be fitted for an orthotic brace, which houses the external magnet and records brace-wear compliance. They will undergo 3MP treatment for 18-24 months, enough to attempt to improve their PSI (< 3.25). |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Magnetic Mini-Mover Procedure (Magnimplant) | Device | This is a non-randomized study in which otherwise healthy patients, ages 8-14, with severe pectus excavatum (PSI > 3.5) will undergo the Magnetic Mini-Mover procedure outpatient surgery. The Magnimplant or Magnetic Mini-Mover device implant will surgically implanted on the sternum. Patients will be required to wear a custom-fitted orthotic brace, which houses the external magnet and records brace-wear compliance. They will undergo brace treatment for 18-24 months, enough to attempt to improve their PSI (< 3.25). Patients will be seen in clinic at least monthly until treatment is complete and the magnimplant device will be explanted from their sternum. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Participants With Adverse Reactions | All adverse reactions were recorded and reported, including complications from implantation of the device, complications from application of the external device over time (e.g., changes in skin; infection; changes in cardiac electrical function). | During treatment, 24 months |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Comfort and Brace Wear During Treatment | Comfort of the external brace directly affects compliance (i.e., bracewear) and compliance were be measured throughout treatment. In addition, the satisfaction of the patient and family will be measured using a standard Quality of Life (QOL) questionnaire administered 1 month after implanting the device and 1 month after removing the device. | During treatment, 24 months |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Michael R Harrison, MD | University of California, San Francisco | Study Director |
| Benjamin Padilla, MD | University of California, San Francisco | Principal Investigator |
| Lan Vu, MD | University of California, San Francisco | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shriners Hospitals for Children | Sacramento | California | 95817 | United States | ||
| UCSF-Benioff Children's Hospital |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20105602 | Background | Harrison MR, Curran PF, Jamshidi R, Christensen D, Bratton BJ, Fechter R, Hirose S. Magnetic mini-mover procedure for pectus excavatum II: initial findings of a Food and Drug Administration-sponsored trial. J Pediatr Surg. 2010 Jan;45(1):185-91; discussion 191-2. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2009.10.032. | |
| 17208545 | Background |
| Label | URL |
|---|---|
| Magnetic Mini-Mover Procedure (3MP) Trial | View source |
Not provided
The end results will be published in Journal of Pediatric Surgery June 2017
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Treatment Arm | This is a non-randomized study in which otherwise healthy patients, ages 8-14, with severe pectus excavatum (PSI > 3.5) underwent the Magnetic Mini-Mover procedure. The internal magnet, or "Magnimplant" was implanted on the sternum. After surgery and recovery, all subjects were fitted for an orthotic brace, the "Magnatract," which is secured to the patient's chest wall by the attractive force between the coupled internal and external magnets and produces an outward force on the sternum to correct the pectus deformity. |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Treatment Arm | This is a non-randomized study in which otherwise healthy patients, ages 8-14, with severe pectus excavatum (PSI > 3.5) will undergo the interventional treatment by having outpatient surgery, the Magnetic Mini-Mover procedure, to both place and later explant the experimental Magnimplant or Magnetic Mini-Mover device. After surgery and recovery, all subjects will be fitted for an orthotic brace, which houses the external magnet and records brace-wear compliance. They will undergo 3MP treatment for 24 months. Patients will be seen in clinic at least monthly until treatment is complete. |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | Mean |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Number of Participants With Adverse Reactions | All adverse reactions were recorded and reported, including complications from implantation of the device, complications from application of the external device over time (e.g., changes in skin; infection; changes in cardiac electrical function). | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | During treatment, 24 months |
|
|
2 years
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Treatment Arm | Magnetic Mini-Mover Procedure (Magnimplant): This is a non-randomized study in which otherwise healthy patients, ages 8-14, with severe pectus excavatum (PSI > 3.5) will undergo the Magnetic Mini-Mover procedure outpatient surgery to both place and later explant the Magnimplant or Magnetic Mini-Mover device. Patients will be required to wear a custom-fitted orthotic brace, which houses the external magnet and records brace-wear compliance. They will undergo 3MP treatment for 24 months. |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Acute cable breakage requiring urgent explant | Product Issues | Non-systematic Assessment | Patient presented to clinic with a sudden anterior movement of the chest and some mild redness of the overlying skin, and a broken cable was discovered on CXR. The implant was removed the following day. |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Post-procedure hospitalization for pain control | Surgical and medical procedures | Non-systematic Assessment | Procedure planned as outpatient. However, medical team was unable to adequately control pain in post-operative care unit, and patient was admitted for 3 days for pain control following the procedure. |
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jill Imamura-Ching, RN | UCSF Benioff Children's Hospital | 415-476-3446 | Jill.Imamura-Ching@ucsf.edu |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D005660 | Funnel Chest |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001848 | Bone Diseases, Developmental |
| D001847 | Bone Diseases |
| D009140 | Musculoskeletal Diseases |
| D009139 | Musculoskeletal Abnormalities |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
|
| Chest Wall Correction, by Pectus Severity Index | Though not powered to determine efficacy, preliminary efficacy data, as measured by pre and post treatment Pectus Severity Index (Haller Index), was also collected. Pre-treatment Haller Index was assessed based on computed tomography (CT) of the chest. One month after implant removal, patients underwent repeat chest CT to evaluate chest wall correction. | 24 months |
| Patient Satisfaction During the Treatment | . Patients were asked to fill out questionnaire at 2 intervals: 1 month after explant and 1 year after explant | One month and one year after explant. |
| San Francisco |
| California |
| 94158 |
| United States |
| Children's Mercy Hospitals | Kansas City | Missouri | 64108 | United States |
| Harrison MR, Estefan-Ventura D, Fechter R, Moran AM Jr, Christensen D. Magnetic Mini-Mover Procedure for pectus excavatum: I. Development, design, and simulations for feasibility and safety. J Pediatr Surg. 2007 Jan;42(1):81-5; discussion 85-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2006.09.042. |
| 22244409 | Background | Harrison MR, Gonzales KD, Bratton BJ, Christensen D, Curran PF, Fechter R, Hirose S. Magnetic mini-mover procedure for pectus excavatum III: safety and efficacy in a Food and Drug Administration-sponsored clinical trial. J Pediatr Surg. 2012 Jan;47(1):154-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2011.10.039. |
| years |
|
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants | No |
|
| Race and Ethnicity Not Collected | Race and Ethnicity were not collected from any participant. | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Pectus Severity Index (Haller Index) | the Haller Index is calculated as a ratio by measuring across the chest internally from one rib on one side to the rib on the opposite side, then dividing the shortest distance between the spine and sternum. | Mean | Full Range | Ratio |
|
|
| Secondary | Comfort and Brace Wear During Treatment | Comfort of the external brace directly affects compliance (i.e., bracewear) and compliance were be measured throughout treatment. In addition, the satisfaction of the patient and family will be measured using a standard Quality of Life (QOL) questionnaire administered 1 month after implanting the device and 1 month after removing the device. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | During treatment, 24 months |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Chest Wall Correction, by Pectus Severity Index | Though not powered to determine efficacy, preliminary efficacy data, as measured by pre and post treatment Pectus Severity Index (Haller Index), was also collected. Pre-treatment Haller Index was assessed based on computed tomography (CT) of the chest. One month after implant removal, patients underwent repeat chest CT to evaluate chest wall correction. | All patients who have received post-treatment chest wall imaging. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | 24 months |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Patient Satisfaction During the Treatment | . Patients were asked to fill out questionnaire at 2 intervals: 1 month after explant and 1 year after explant | 14 Participants offered recommendations at 2 time intervals | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | One month and one year after explant. |
|
|
|
| 0 |
| 15 |
| 2 |
| 15 |
| 4 |
| 15 |
|
| Nonacute cable breakage requiring explant | Cardiac disorders | Non-systematic Assessment | Patient with asymptomatic cable breakage discovered on screening CXR; elected to keep device. Several months later, presented with shortness of breath, symptomatic pericardial effusion, possibly due to device. Device was removed. |
|
|
| Wound infection | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | Non-systematic Assessment | Same patient as above (admitted for pain control) developed a superficial surgical site infection 3 weeks after the implant procedure, which resolved with an outpatient course of sulfamethoxazole / trimethoprim. |
|
| Pneumothorax | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | Non-systematic Assessment | One patient developed a post-operative pneumothorax following the implant procedure and was admitted overnight for chest tube placement and air evacuation. |
|
| Rash | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | Non-systematic Assessment | One patient developed a rash on the chest wall from brace wear during warm weather, which resolved with nystatin powder. |
|
Not provided
| D000013 | Congenital Abnormalities |
| D009358 | Congenital, Hereditary, and Neonatal Diseases and Abnormalities |
| Title | Measurements |
|---|
|
| Title |
|---|
| Measurements |
|---|
|
| Satisfaction with results after 1 year |
|