Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Tata Memorial Hospital | OTHER_GOV |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the impact on overall survival of an intensive follow-up protocol (as practiced today at TMH) against a more cost effective follow-up protocol in patients operated for extremity sarcoma.
Follow up studies are performed for a variety of reasons. The detection of a recurrence of the index lesion is the foundation of surveillance. Detection of other medical conditions is a secondary benefit. Psychologically, follow up testing can serve as a source of reassurance. Whether an increased frequency of follow up and the use of various expensive imaging modalities for screening and early detection of recurrence actually results in improving overall survival of patients with extremity sarcomas is a question that remains as yet unanswered. Currently followed post -operative surveillance regimes are empirical and vary widely from centre to centre. Allocation of limited health funding should be guided by evidence based recommendations rather than empirical beliefs. An ideal surveillance regime should meet the criteria of easy implementation, accuracy and cost effectiveness.
In a vast country like India where patients often travel thousands of kilometers in their search for quality medical care the frequency of routine follow up visits is as important as studying the role of expensive screening modalities while drawing up guidelines for cost effective follow up strategies.
This study, a prospective randomized controlled trial, attempts to outline guidelines regarding the role of follow up vis a vis frequency and the use of various imaging modalities for early detection of recurrence in improving overall survival of patients with extremity sarcomas.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1A | Intensive - 3 monthly follow up | ||
| 1B | Intensive - 6 monthly follow up | ||
| IIA | Cost Effective - 3 monthly follow up | ||
| IIB | Cost Effective - 6 monthly follow up |
Not provided
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Survival | Minimum 2 years |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Disease free survival | Minimum 2 years |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Patients operated for primary or recurrent extremity bone & soft tissue sarcomas
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Dr. Ajay Puri | Tata Memorial Hospital | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tata Memorial Hospital | Mumbai | Maharashtra | 400012 | India |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 24249538 | Derived | Puri A, Gulia A, Hawaldar R, Ranganathan P, Badwe RA. Does intensity of surveillance affect survival after surgery for sarcomas? Results of a randomized noninferiority trial. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014 May;472(5):1568-75. doi: 10.1007/s11999-013-3385-9. Epub 2013 Nov 19. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D012509 | Sarcoma |
| D001859 | Bone Neoplasms |
| D012983 | Soft Tissue Neoplasms |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D018204 | Neoplasms, Connective and Soft Tissue |
| D009370 | Neoplasms by Histologic Type |
| D009369 | Neoplasms |
| D009371 | Neoplasms by Site |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| D001847 | Bone Diseases |
| D009140 | Musculoskeletal Diseases |