Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The results of this study will provide sound, scientific evidence of physiologic mechanisms responsible for upper-extremity weakness; evidence of the processes involved in neuromuscular adaptation; and will elucidate the relationship between impairment and motor disability in post-stroke hemiparesis.
This proposal extends the work accomplished in our initial study (project #B2405R, 'Effects of Strength Training on Upper-limb Function in Post-stroke Hemiparesis'). In the present study we will conduct a double-blind, randomized clinical trial of staged rehabilitation for the upper-extremity involving sequential delivery of functional therapy and high intensity resistance training. Therefore, this proposal directly compares the effects of functional and resistance training delivered individually. The researchers' previous work investigated a hybrid therapy of functional and resistance training against functional training alone. All subjects will participate in a 5 week run-in period of no treatment. This no-treatment block will afford multiple baseline measurements and, in addition, will provide information regarding the rate and magnitude of any spontaneous recovery without treatment. Following the second baseline measurement, all subjects will be randomized to upper-extremity rehabilitation in either: Order A - 10 weeks of functional task practice training (FTP) followed by 10 weeks of high-intensity resistance training (Power) or Order B - resistance training (Power) followed by FTP. Re-evaluation will occur following each block of treatment,and retention effects will be evaluated after 6 and 12 months with no additional treatment. Subjects will be evaluated with: outcome measures used broadly in Clinical Neurology and Rehabilitation, a battery of biomechanical performance measures including: strength, muscle activation, reflex modulation, and motor coordination, and with kinematics of free reaching movements. The researchers will investigate persons in the intermediate phase of recovery which they define as between 6 and 18 months post-stroke , having completed all inpatient and outpatient therapies, with remaining residual motor deficits.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Control | Active Comparator | FTP: 30 sessions (90 minute sessions, 3 times per week, 10 weeks) followed by POWER: 30 sessions (90 minute sessions, 3 times per week, 10 weeks) |
|
| Experimental | Experimental | POWER: 30 sessions (90 minute sessions, 3 times per week, 10 weeks) followed by FTP: 30 sessions (90 minute sessions, 3 times per week, 10 weeks) |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | Other | Following an initial testing session, you will complete a 5 week no training period. At the end of this period you will then participate in a 20 week therapy program - 10 weeks of Functional Task Practice (FTP) followed by 10 weeks of Power training (dynamic resistance exercise). Each 10 week block has 30 therapy sessions for a total of 60 sessions, each lasting approximately 1-1/2 hours. Follow up evaluations will be scheduled at 6 months and 12 months after completion of the entire 20 week therapy program. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change in Trunk Displacement | Distance (in cm) of trunk lean while performing reach-to-grasp. This information is obtained from kinematics/3D motion capture and is used to inform regarding compensatory use of the trunk as compared to active motion of the shoulder, elbow, wrist, and hand, during reach-to-grasp. Change scores are expressed relative to baseline. | baseline, 10 weeks, 20 weeks |
| Change in Shoulder Flexion | joint range of motion obtained using kinematics / motion capture. Change scores expressed relative to baseline. | baseline, 10 weeks, 20 weeks |
| Change in Elbow Extension Range of Motion | joint range of motion obtained using kinematics / motion capture. Change scores are expressed relative to baseline. | baseline, 10 weeks, 20 weeks |
| Upper-extremity Fugl-Meyer Motor Assessment | The Fugl-Meyer Motor Assessment is a standardized scale used to measure the magnitude of motor impairment (severity) following stroke. There are separate sub-scales for the upper and lower extremities. Here we used the upper-extremity component; the full range of the scale is 0 - 66 points. Higher scores approaching 66 represent better, and lower scores approaching 0 worse, motor function. There is a significant ceiling effect with the FMA, thus a score of 66 points does not mean an individual with stroke has fully recovered. Data are change scores expressed relative to baseline. | baseline, 10 weeks, 20 weeks |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Movement Speed | peak velocity of movement (cm/s) during reach-to-grasp, obtained using kinematics/motion capture. Data are change scores expressed relative to baseline. | baseline, 10 weeks, 20 weeks |
| Movement Accuracy (Reach Path Ratio, RPR) |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Carolynn Patten, PhD | North Florida/South Georgia Veterans Health System | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| North Florida/South Georgia Veterans Health System | Gainesville | Florida | 32608 | United States |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 22357633 | Result | Corti M, McGuirk TE, Wu SS, Patten C. Differential effects of power training versus functional task practice on compensation and restoration of arm function after stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2012 Sep;26(7):842-54. doi: 10.1177/1545968311433426. Epub 2012 Feb 22. | |
| 22277759 | Result | Phadke CP, Robertson CT, Condliffe EG, Patten C. Upper-extremity H-reflex measurement post-stroke: reliability and inter-limb differences. Clin Neurophysiol. 2012 Aug;123(8):1606-15. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2011.12.012. Epub 2012 Jan 23. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Order A (FTP Prior to Power) | Participants randomized to Order A received 10 weeks of functional task practice (FTP) followed by 10 weeks of upper-extremity power training (Power). |
| FG001 | Order B (Power Prior to FTP) | Participants randomized to Order B received 10 weeks of upper-extremity Power Training followed by 10 weeks of functional task practice (FTP). |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Order A | Participants randomized to Order A received 10 weeks of functional task practice (FTP) followed by 10 weeks of upper-extremity power training (Power). Single, unilateral stroke, >6 <26 months post-event. |
| BG001 | Order B |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Categorical | Count of Participants |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Change in Trunk Displacement | Distance (in cm) of trunk lean while performing reach-to-grasp. This information is obtained from kinematics/3D motion capture and is used to inform regarding compensatory use of the trunk as compared to active motion of the shoulder, elbow, wrist, and hand, during reach-to-grasp. Change scores are expressed relative to baseline. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | centimeters | baseline, 10 weeks, 20 weeks |
|
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Order A | Participants randomized to Order A received 10 weeks of functional task practice (FTP) followed by 10 weeks of upper-extremity power training (Power). Single, unilateral stroke, >6 <26 months post-event. |
Not provided
Not provided
This was a small clinical trial (total n = 14).
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dr. Carolynn Patten | VA Brain Rehabilitation Research Center | 352.376.1611 | 4160 | carolynn.patten@va.gov |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D020521 | Stroke |
| D018908 | Muscle Weakness |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D002561 | Cerebrovascular Disorders |
| D001927 | Brain Diseases |
| D002493 | Central Nervous System Diseases |
| D009422 | Nervous System Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
|
| Experimental | Other | Following an initial testing session, you will complete a 5 week no training period. At the end of this period you will then participate in a 20 week therapy program - 10 weeks of Power training (dynamic resistance exercise) followed by 10 weeks of Functional Task Practice (FTP). Each 10 week block has 30 therapy sessions for a total of 60 sessions, each lasting approximately 1-1/2 hours. Follow up evaluations will be scheduled at 6 months and 12 months after completion of the entire 20 week therapy program. |
|
|
Measure is derived from kinematics/motion analysis. RPR = ratio of actual reach trajectory relative to an idealized straight line. Data are change scores, expressed relative to baseline.
| baseline, 10 weeks, 20 weeks |
| Movement Smoothness | Movement smoothness is determined by assessing the number of sub movements (i.e., starts and stops) that can be identified during performance of a task. Here the task was reach-to-grasp. Sub movement are identified from kinematics/3D motion analysis. Sub-movements represent discontinuities or "jerky" movements. For example, skilled reaching is smooth and may reveal a single movement unit; in contrast, unskilled movements will reveal multiple movement units (i.e., starts and stops). As a performer practices and learns the movement, the number of sub movements is reduced. Sub movements can also present in persons with pathology. The unit of sub movements is whole numbers, or counts, of the sub movements. Data are change scores, expressed relative to baseline. | baseline, 10 weeks, 20 weeks |
| 25135282 | Result | Phadke CP, Robertson CT, Patten C. Upper-extremity spinal reflex inhibition is reproducible and strongly related to grip force poststroke. Int J Neurosci. 2015 Jun;125(6):441-8. doi: 10.3109/00207454.2014.946990. Epub 2014 Sep 3. |
Participants randomized to Order B received 10 weeks of upper-extremity Power Training followed by 10 weeks of functional task practice (FTP).
Single, unilateral stroke, >6 <26 months post-event.
| BG002 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| Participants |
|
| Age, Continuous | Mean | Standard Deviation | years |
|
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Region of Enrollment | Number | participants |
|
|
|
|
| Primary | Change in Shoulder Flexion | joint range of motion obtained using kinematics / motion capture. Change scores expressed relative to baseline. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | degrees | baseline, 10 weeks, 20 weeks |
|
|
|
|
| Primary | Change in Elbow Extension Range of Motion | joint range of motion obtained using kinematics / motion capture. Change scores are expressed relative to baseline. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | degrees | baseline, 10 weeks, 20 weeks |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Movement Speed | peak velocity of movement (cm/s) during reach-to-grasp, obtained using kinematics/motion capture. Data are change scores expressed relative to baseline. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | cm/s | baseline, 10 weeks, 20 weeks |
|
|
|
|
| Primary | Upper-extremity Fugl-Meyer Motor Assessment | The Fugl-Meyer Motor Assessment is a standardized scale used to measure the magnitude of motor impairment (severity) following stroke. There are separate sub-scales for the upper and lower extremities. Here we used the upper-extremity component; the full range of the scale is 0 - 66 points. Higher scores approaching 66 represent better, and lower scores approaching 0 worse, motor function. There is a significant ceiling effect with the FMA, thus a score of 66 points does not mean an individual with stroke has fully recovered. Data are change scores expressed relative to baseline. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale | baseline, 10 weeks, 20 weeks |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Movement Accuracy (Reach Path Ratio, RPR) | Measure is derived from kinematics/motion analysis. RPR = ratio of actual reach trajectory relative to an idealized straight line. Data are change scores, expressed relative to baseline. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | ratio | baseline, 10 weeks, 20 weeks |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Movement Smoothness | Movement smoothness is determined by assessing the number of sub movements (i.e., starts and stops) that can be identified during performance of a task. Here the task was reach-to-grasp. Sub movement are identified from kinematics/3D motion analysis. Sub-movements represent discontinuities or "jerky" movements. For example, skilled reaching is smooth and may reveal a single movement unit; in contrast, unskilled movements will reveal multiple movement units (i.e., starts and stops). As a performer practices and learns the movement, the number of sub movements is reduced. Sub movements can also present in persons with pathology. The unit of sub movements is whole numbers, or counts, of the sub movements. Data are change scores, expressed relative to baseline. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | sub movements | baseline, 10 weeks, 20 weeks |
|
|
|
|
| 0 |
| 8 |
| 0 |
| 8 |
| EG001 | Order B | Participants randomized to Order B received 10 weeks of upper-extremity Power Training followed by 10 weeks of functional task practice (FTP). Single, unilateral stroke, >6 <26 months post-event. | 0 | 6 | 0 | 6 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| D014652 | Vascular Diseases |
| D002318 | Cardiovascular Diseases |
| D009135 | Muscular Diseases |
| D009140 | Musculoskeletal Diseases |
| D020879 | Neuromuscular Manifestations |
| D009461 | Neurologic Manifestations |
| D010335 | Pathologic Processes |
| D013568 | Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |
| D012816 | Signs and Symptoms |
| t-test, 2 sided |
| 0.048 |
| Superiority or Other |
| t-test, 2 sided |
| 0.034 |
| Superiority or Other |
| t-test, 2 sided |
| .168 |
| Superiority or Other |
| Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) |
| 0.948 |
| Superiority or Other |
| t-test, 2 sided |
| 0.4 |
| Superiority or Other |
| t-test, 2 sided |
| 0.635 |
| Superiority or Other |