Effects Of Criteria Versus Time-Based Rehabilitation On Return To Play In Football Players

Effects Of Criteria Versus Time-Based Rehabilitation On Return To Play In Football Players

This randomized controlled trial compares criteria-based rehabilitation (CBR) with time-based rehabilitation (TBR) for football players aged 18-35 with ACL reconstruction, hamstring strain, or ankle sprain. Both groups receive a six-week supervised rehabilitation program; the progression rules differ between groups.

Eligible football players will be recruited from local football clubs and academies in Islamabad Capital Territory and Rawalpindi. Written informed consent will be obtained. Participants will be randomly allocated 1:1 using a concealed, computer-generated sequence. Baseline demographic, functional, and psychological measures will be collected. Both groups follow the same general phase-based rehabilitation structure under licensed physiotherapist supervision. CBR progression depends on objective functional and psychological milestones; TBR progression follows fixed time intervals and return-to-play clearance at week 6 irrespective of milestones. Progression is paused or regressed if pain is ≥4/10 on VAS or swelling returns.

Inclusion Criteria:

• Injury Type: ACL reconstruction, hamstring strain, and ankle sprain.
• Rehabilitation Phase: Phase 3 for ACL injuries, Phase 1&2 for hamstring strains and ankle sprains.
• Football Activity: Active at club or regional football level

Exclusion Criteria:

• History of Major surgery in affected limb
• Chronic neurological or musculoskeletal disorder
• Non-football athletes