Lattice-tip Versus Pentaspline Catheter for Pulsed-Field Ablation of Persistent Atrial Fibrillation
Lattice-tip Versus Pentaspline Catheter for Pulsed-Field Ablation of Persistent Atrial Fibrillation
LANCE-AF is a prospective, multicenter, multinational, randomized, non-inferiority trial comparing two pulsed-field ablation catheter technologies-the Sphere-9 lattice-tip catheter and the FARAPULSE pentaspline catheter-in patients with symptomatic persistent atrial fibrillation.
In both treatment groups, atrial fibrillation ablation will be restricted to pulmonary vein isolation. Empirical left atrial substrate modification will not be permitted. An insertable cardiac rhythm monitor will be implanted during the index procedure to provide continuous rhythm monitoring for 12 months.
The primary objective is to determine whether ablation using the Sphere-9 catheter is non-inferior to ablation using the FARAPULSE catheter with respect to acute pulmonary vein isolation and freedom from treatment failure through 12 months. Secondary objectives include comparisons of procedural safety, postablation atrial arrhythmia burden, longest atrial arrhythmia episode, quality of life, and procedural efficiency.
Pulsed-field ablation is increasingly used for pulmonary vein isolation in patients with atrial fibrillation. However, the comparative efficacy, safety, and procedural efficiency of the Sphere-9 lattice-tip catheter and the FARAPULSE pentaspline catheter have not been established in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation. Furthermore, outcomes following a pulmonary-vein-isolation-only strategy in this population have not been adequately evaluated using continuous rhythm monitoring.
LANCE-AF is a prospective, multicenter, multinational, randomized, non-inferiority trial enrolling patients with symptomatic persistent atrial fibrillation. Eligible participants must have continuous atrial fibrillation lasting more than 7 but less than 365 days. Participants will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to pulmonary vein isolation using either the Sphere-9 lattice-tip catheter or the FARAPULSE pentaspline catheter.
All participants will undergo pulmonary vein isolation as the sole permitted atrial fibrillation ablation lesion set. Empirical left atrial substrate modification will not be permitted. Participants presenting in atrial fibrillation or another non-sinus rhythm will undergo cardioversion to sinus rhythm before ablation. Acute procedural success will be confirmed by demonstration of entrance block in all treated pulmonary veins at the end of the procedure. Cavotricuspid isthmus ablation is the only permitted non-pulmonary-vein lesion set and may be performed only in participants with documented typical atrial flutter. Catheter use for cavotricuspid isthmus ablation will follow the treatment-group-specific requirements defined in the protocol.
An insertable cardiac rhythm monitor will be implanted during the index procedure and will provide continuous rhythm monitoring throughout the study, with a 2-month postablation blanking period.
Participants will be followed for 12 months after the index ablation procedure, with continuous rhythm monitoring provided by the insertable cardiac monitor. Scheduled remote assessments will be performed at 30 days, at the end of the 2-month blanking period, and at 6 months. An in-person assessment will be performed at 12 months. Unscheduled assessments will be performed as clinically indicated.
The primary endpoint combines acute ablation success with freedom from treatment failure through 12 months. Treatment failure is defined as the occurrence of any of the following: insertable-cardiac-monitor-documented atrial fibrillation, atrial flutter, or atrial tachycardia lasting at least 6 minutes; electrical or pharmacological cardioversion for an atrial arrhythmia; repeat atrial ablation; or protocol-defined use of a Class I or Class III antiarrhythmic drug. These events are assessed after the 2-month blanking period, except that any amiodarone use after the index ablation, including during the blanking period, constitutes treatment failure.
Secondary outcomes include a composite of prespecified device- and procedure-related adverse events, postablation atrial fibrillation/atrial flutter/atrial tachycardia burden, the proportion of participants with an atrial arrhythmia burden below 0.1%, the duration of the longest atrial arrhythmia episode, time to first atrial arrhythmia episode, changes in quality of life assessed using the AFEQT and EQ-5D-5L questionnaires, total procedure time, left atrial dwell time, and fluoroscopy time and dose.
All insertable-cardiac-monitor-flagged episodes contributing to the efficacy endpoints will be reviewed by two independent adjudicators blinded to treatment assignment and catheter type. Disagreements will be referred to a third blinded adjudicator, with the majority determination considered final. Prespecified safety events will be reviewed by an independent Clinical Events Committee. An independent Data and Safety Monitoring Board will provide external safety oversight. The primary non-inferiority analysis will be performed in both the Full Analysis Set and Per-Protocol populations using a non-inferiority margin of 10 percentage points.
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Anatomical and procedural exclusions
steis@otenet.gr+302106869777
Paris, France
mik.laredo@gmail.com0033142160000
Athens, Greece
Rotterdam, Netherlands
mirakbenali@gmail.com0033477828679
dtsiachris@yahoo.com00302132088099
vlachos.konstantinos7@gmail.com00302106867000
stzeis@otenet.gr0030302106869777
ioannidis.pan@gmail.com00302106184000
s.c.yap@erasmusmc.nl0031107040563
daniel.rodriguez.mnz@gmail.com0034913908000
joaquinosca@gmail.com0034961244000
tobias.reichlin@insel.ch0041316325000