Comparative Effects of Diode Laser and LED Photobiomodulation on Maxillary Canine Retraction During Orthodontic Treatment
Comparative Effects of Diode Laser and LED Photobiomodulation on Maxillary Canine Retraction During Orthodontic Treatment
This study aims to compare the effects of diode laser and light-emitting diode (LED) photobiomodulation on maxillary canine retraction during fixed orthodontic treatment. Participants requiring bilateral maxillary first premolar extraction will receive both interventions using a split-mouth design. One maxillary canine will receive diode laser photobiomodulation, while the contralateral maxillary canine will receive LED photobiomodulation.
Maxillary canine movement will be evaluated at 4, 8, 12, and 16 weeks during retraction to compare the amount and rate of tooth movement between the two interventions. Pain associated with orthodontic tooth movement will also be assessed.
Pulp oxygen saturation (SpO₂) of the maxillary canines will be measured to evaluate changes in pulpal oxygenation during orthodontic canine retraction. SpO₂ will be assessed at baseline and at predefined follow-up time points, including 20 minutes, 24 hours, 7 days, and 4 weeks. Changes in SpO₂ will be compared between the diode laser and LED sides.
Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) will be used to evaluate changes in maxillary canine root length and alveolar bone dimensions before and after canine retraction.
The study is expected to determine whether diode laser and LED photobiomodulation differ in their effects on orthodontic canine retraction, pulpal oxygenation, pain, and associated dental and alveolar bone changes.
This is an interventional split-mouth clinical study comparing diode laser and light-emitting diode (LED) photobiomodulation during maxillary canine retraction in patients undergoing fixed orthodontic treatment.
After alignment and leveling, maxillary canine retraction will be performed using standardized orthodontic mechanics. Each participant will receive both photobiomodulation interventions. One maxillary canine will receive diode laser photobiomodulation, while the contralateral maxillary canine will receive LED photobiomodulation according to the predefined side-allocation procedure. The interventions will be repeated at 4-week intervals during the 16-week observation period.
Digital intraoral scans will be obtained to quantify maxillary canine movement. Cumulative canine retraction will be assessed at 4, 8, 12, and 16 weeks. The amount and rate of canine retraction will be compared between the diode laser and LED sides within the same participant.
Pulp oxygen saturation (SpO₂) of the maxillary canines will be assessed to evaluate pulpal oxygenation during orthodontic tooth movement. SpO₂ measurements will be obtained separately from the canine receiving diode laser photobiomodulation and the contralateral canine receiving LED photobiomodulation at baseline, 20 minutes, 24 hours, 7 days, and 4 weeks after initiation of canine retraction. Changes from baseline and differences in SpO₂ between the two intervention sides will be evaluated.
Pain associated with orthodontic tooth movement will be assessed using a visual analog scale (VAS) after photobiomodulation. Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) examinations obtained before and after the canine retraction period will be used to evaluate changes in maxillary canine root length and alveolar bone dimensions.
Because both interventions are administered within the same participant, the split-mouth design allows direct within-participant comparison of diode laser and LED photobiomodulation while reducing the influence of interindividual biological variability.
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
lenguyenlam@ctump.edu.vn+84 918130809