Evaluating Different Protocols of Non-invasive Brain Stimulation (NIBS) in Stroke Rehabilitation
Evaluating Different Protocols of Non-invasive Brain Stimulation (NIBS) in Stroke Rehabilitation
This study aims to improve brain stimulation techniques for stroke patients dealing with motor and language issues. Researchers believe that current practices lack clarity because patients aren't grouped effectively and stimulation methods vary widely.
The study will include 250 participants from Alexandra Hospital and National University Hospital. Once someone is eligible and agrees to join, they'll first undergo a baseline assessment to evaluate their condition. After that, they'll receive non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) over the course of a month.
Participants will be assigned to specific NIBS treatments-either transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) or repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS)-based on their rehabilitation goals, medical history, and initial assessment results. Those needing to improve upper or lower limb movement, alleviate language difficulties (aphasia), or address neglect will receive tailored interventions: 20 sessions of tDCS or 12 sessions of rTMS.
After the treatment, participants will be assessed again immediately and then six weeks later to measure any changes in their condition.
This is a non-randomized study aimed to refine and confirm non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) protocols for motor and language deficits and stratification of stroke patients. The lack of stratification of patients and the variety of current stimulation protocols used has been suggested to have contributed to the lack of clarity in this area.
250 subjects will be recruited from Alexandra Hospital (AH) and National University Hospital (NUH). Once subject is identified to be eligible for the study and is agreeable to participate into the study, he/she will undergo the outcome measures of Baseline Assessment. After that, subject will receive NIBS intervention in the following 1 month.
The NIBS intervention that any subject is going to receive will be assigned by the medical doctors in the study team. The intervention allocation will be determined by:
The same outcome measures will be performed again after the last NIBS session (Post Assessment), and 6 weeks after the last NIBS session (Follow-up Assessment).
Inclusion Criteria:
3a. Upper limb motor impairment with the sum of Medical Research Council grades for shoulder abduction and finger Extension (SAFE) ≤ 8; 3b. Lower limb motor impairment with Functional Ambulation Classification (FAC) 0-3; 3c. Neglect as assessed by Behavioural Inattention Test with a cut-off of <129 and Catherine Bergego Scale with a cut-off of >5/30 3d. Expressive Aphasia as indicated by AusTOMS score of 1-4 (mild to severe) in the Language and Speech scales 4. Being able to follow instruction and give consent.
Exclusion Criteria:
effie_chew@nuhs.edu.sg65-64722000
ning_tang@nuhs.edu.sg
effie_chew@nuhs.edu.sg
ning_tang@nuhs.edu.sg