A Combined 2% Lidocaine Anesthetic Technique for Mandibular Molar Procedures Without Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block: A Prospective Pilot Study
A Combined 2% Lidocaine Anesthetic Technique for Mandibular Molar Procedures Without Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block: A Prospective Pilot Study
This prospective single-arm pilot study evaluated the clinical effectiveness of a combined local anesthetic technique using 2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine for dental procedures involving mandibular molars. The technique combined supraperiosteal, subperiosteal, and periodontal ligament injections and was designed to provide adequate local anesthesia without the use of a conventional inferior alveolar nerve block. Participants requiring restorative, endodontic, extraction, or immediate implant procedures involving mandibular molars received the standardized anesthetic protocol. The primary outcome was successful completion of the planned dental procedure without pain requiring additional conventional nerve block anesthesia. The need for repeat administration and the occurrence of complications were also assessed.
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
This prospective, single-arm pilot study was conducted to evaluate a combined local anesthetic technique for mandibular molar procedures without the use of a conventional inferior alveolar nerve block (IANB). Patients requiring dental treatment involving mandibular molars were enrolled according to predefined eligibility criteria.
Local anesthesia was administered using 2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine and a 27-gauge short needle. The standardized technique consisted of three components: supraperiosteal, subperiosteal, and periodontal ligament (PDL) injections. Initially, 0.2 mL of anesthetic solution was administered supraperiosteally, followed by 0.2 mL subperiosteally with deeper needle penetration. PDL anesthesia was then administered on both the mesial and distal aspects of the involved tooth, using 0.5 mL of anesthetic solution at each site.
Anesthetic effectiveness was clinically assessed before and during the planned dental procedure. If adequate anesthesia was not achieved after the initial administration, the combined anesthetic protocol was repeated once. The need for additional conventional inferior alveolar nerve block anesthesia was recorded. Participants were also followed for 48-72 hours to identify any complications associated with the anesthetic technique.
The study included mandibular molars requiring restorative treatment, root canal treatment, extraction, or immediate implant placement. The study was intended to provide preliminary clinical evidence regarding the feasibility and effectiveness of this combined local anesthetic approach and to inform the design of future controlled clinical trials.