Comparison of the Effectiveness of Ultrasound-Guided Periradicular Injections in Patients With Lumbar Radicular Pain
Comparison of the Effectiveness of Ultrasound-Guided Periradicular Injections in Patients With Lumbar Radicular Pain
This study aims to compare the effects of different ultrasound-guided periradicular injection solutions in patients with chronic unilateral radicular pain caused by a single-level lumbar disc herniation.
Participants receive an ultrasound-guided periradicular injection containing lidocaine and dexamethasone, either alone or combined with 5% dextrose or 0.9% sodium chloride. The study evaluates whether adding dextrose or sodium chloride provides additional benefit in reducing pain and improving function and quality of life.
Pain intensity, disability, quality of life, and analgesic use are assessed before treatment and during follow-up. The main hypothesis is that the addition of 5% dextrose or 0.9% sodium chloride may improve the clinical effectiveness of the injection compared with lidocaine and dexamethasone alone.
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
The aim of this study is to evaluate whether the addition of 5% dextrose or 0.9% sodium chloride to a corticosteroid and local anesthetic solution provides additional benefit in patients with unilateral radicular pain due to single-level lumbar disc herniation. The study also evaluates whether these solutions may facilitate separation of the disc material and surrounding soft tissues from the affected nerve root and whether dextrose provides an additional analgesic effect in relieving radicular pain.
The study was designed as a randomized, controlled, prospective, single-blind clinical trial. A total of 33 patients aged 25-65 years with chronic low back pain resistant to conservative treatment and unilateral radicular leg pain, with single-level lumbar disc herniation confirmed by physical examination and magnetic resonance imaging, were included.
Participants were assigned to treatment groups according to a computer-generated randomization scheme. With n = 11 participants in each group, the first group received a total of 3 mL consisting of 1 mL of 0.2% lidocaine hydrochloride and 8 mg/2 mL of dexamethasone. The second group received a total of 10 mL consisting of 1 mL of 0.2% lidocaine hydrochloride, 8 mg/2 mL of dexamethasone, and 7 mL of 5% dextrose. The third group received a total of 10 mL consisting of 1 mL of 0.2% lidocaine hydrochloride, 8 mg/2 mL of dexamethasone, and 7 mL of 0.9% sodium chloride solution.
Participants were unaware of their assigned treatment group. In all participants, injections were administered under sterile conditions in the outpatient interventional procedure room with the participant in the prone position. All procedures were performed under ultrasound guidance using a 1-5 MHz convex probe as a single-session, unilateral, single-level periradicular injection.
Participants were evaluated at four time points: before the injection, 1 hour after the injection, and during face-to-face follow-up visits at 1 and 3 months. The primary outcome measure was pain intensity assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS). Secondary outcome measures included the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), the Short Form-36, and the amount of analgesic use.