Comparative Effects of Stabilization Exercises and Corrective Exercises on Pain, Respiratory Function, and Postural Alignment in Administrative Staff With Upper Cross Syndrome
This study compares two types of rehabilitation strategies' - the stabilization exercises and the corrective exercises - to improve pain, respiratory function, and postural alignment in administrative staff with upper cross syndrome. Participants undertook a six-week intervention program. Random sampling technique was employed and 50 participants were included out of which 4 participants drops out. Randmoization was done via computer generator.The participants were divided into two groups: group A (Stabilization Exercises) and group B (Corrective Exercises). The process of data collection was conducted at MTH, and united hospital and participants will have included according to inclusion criteria. Pain was assessed by using the numeric pain rating. Respiratory function was assessed by using a digital spirometer. Postural alignment i.e., CVA & SHA was assessed by using kinovea-2D video analysis. Mid thoracic curve was assessed by using Flexi curve rule.This study aims to determine which treatment produces greater improvement, which may help physiotherapists to give more effective evidence based treatment patients with UCS in Pakistan.
Effects of IASTM Along With Comprehensive Corrective Exercise Program in Upper Cross Syndrome.
Dynamic Neuromuscular Stabilization Versus Corrective Exercises in Upper Cross Syndrome
Effect Of PNF Techniques Versus CCEP On Pain, Function and Quality of Life In Patients With Upper Cross Syndrome
Effect of a Comprehensive Corrective Exercise Program With and Without Instrument-Assisted Soft Tissue Mobilization on Cervical Range of Motion, Muscle Strength, Disability, and Postural Alignment in Individuals With Upper-Crossed Syndrome
Comparative Effect of Maitland Mobilization Combined With Kendall Exercises for Pain and Postural Alignment in Adults With Upper Cross Syndrome