Comparison of a Minimal Incision and Minimal Soft-Tissue Injury (MISI) Technique Versus the Standard Technique in Robotic-Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Randomized Controlled Trial
This randomized controlled trial will compare a minimal-incision and soft-tissue-preserving (MISI) technique with the standard surgical technique in patients undergoing robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty for knee osteoarthritis. A total of 100 participants will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to undergo either the MISI technique, which uses a reduced skin incision, limited soft-tissue dissection, and modified tracking pin placement, or the standard technique. The primary outcome is postoperative scar assessment at 3 months. Secondary outcomes include incision length, wound oozing, thigh pain and tenderness, recovery of straight-leg raising, tracking pin-related complications, patellar height, patient-reported scar assessments, and functional outcomes during follow-up.
Comparison of a Minimally Invasive Technique for Total Knee Replacement to a Standard Technique
Comparison of Implant Positioning With Robotic Aided Surgery and Traditional Jig Positioning in Total Knee Arthroplasty
Minimally Invasive Versus Conventional Approaches in Navigated Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA)